Beauty and the Beast (2017) is a remake of the 1991 Beauty and the Beast. Beauty and the Beast is about a girl who’s father goes to town but frantically gets lost and gets captured by a beast. The beast used to be an ill-tempered prince who was turned into a beast as his punishment when he turned away an old woman looking for shelter. If he did not find someone to love him before the last rose petal fell, he would be imprisoned as a beast for the rest of his life. The author’s review on the new movie was generally a decent one. The author had more good things to say than bad and they generally thought the movie was a good one. In addition, the review talked about the general storyline of the movie, the general theme, and the things, they thought, were not the best. The author talks about how it is a acceptable interpretation of the original movie because the basic plot is the same. Maurice, Belle’s father, becomes imprisoned by the beast. When Belle finds him, she graciously offers to take his place. The objects in the house then plan to have Belle fall in love with the prince and break the spell. This will cause return the beast and all of the items to transform back to their previous human forms. It then carries on and talks about an …show more content…
There are parts in the live-version that are not a part of the animated version and vise versa. The review the author gave is a very close comparison to mine, but I feel as though some points should have been expressed more than they were. I believe that Belle’s mother should not have been present in the new movie to be a replica of the animated version and that the way Maurice gets captured should have been kept the same. The music should have stayed along the same lines. As you can see, a classic is an outstanding one of a kind piece of material. The new movie should not have been changing the parts that it
The movie also changed some things in the book like how when Max and Freak left Freak never
The aspects of the book that have been changed are differences but those differences are not bad. They accentuate the creativity of the movies filmer and his/her opinion on the book. The book is different from the movie but it is also similar. I have combined the movie and book together when I think about The Secret Life of Bees. I have learned what T.Ray was doing while Lily was away, from the movie, and I have also learned how delicate a person can be from May.
I wanted the book and the movie be the same or at least similar. If someone wants to make a movie based on a book, they should be similar. The movie had a complete different
The Wonderful Wizard of Oz written by L. Frank Baum and The Wizard of Oz directed by Victor Fleming has many differences even though they are based on the same story. In the book, Dorothy actually goes to the Land of Oz; however, in the film it was all just a dream. The second way they are different is Dorothy purposely threw water at the Wicked Witch of the West; however, in the film she was putting out a fire on Scarecrow. In the book Oz gave a brain, a heart, and courage, yet in the film he gave a Th. D, a medal of courage, and a heart clock.
Belle viewed the Beast as just a monster but over-time, Belle changes him for the better and falls in love with him, appearance and all (“Beauty and the Beast (1991) - Plot Summary”). Belle is the perfect modern representation White Goddess Archetype. Belle is very intelligent and is misunderstood. She is not like other girls her age who fawned over Gaston. Belle showed her intelligence reading books and always craving to learn more.
I might complain sometimes that I don’t like it when a movie changes a book but most of the times it’s ok because it can make the story more fun, interesting and less boring. Or if you don’t understand the book or play then the movie might help in understanding what the story is telling the viewer
The movie did have some parts that I thought were better
One of the more obvious changes is the absence of Brick’s possible homosexual relationship with Skipper. Because of the Motion Picture Production Code, these references had to be taken out of the movie. In the book it is alluded to Brick and Skipper having something more than a friendship. Maggie calls Brick out on this when she says, “You two had
“For in my dark despair I've slowly understood My perfect world out there Had disappeared for good But in its place I feel A truer life begin And it’s so good and real it must come from within” (Beauty, A Change In Me). She has given up her life behind to help her father and make sure he did not die in the cell Beast had him in. After being traded the cell for a nicer room, Beast demands that Belle has dinner with him, hoping a relationship could
This photo still of Mrs. Potts and Chip from the 1991 film “Beauty and the Beast” represents the correlation between early childhood and animism. During early childhood, it is common for children to think objects have the ability to become alive and take on human characteristics. In the film, “Beauty and the Beast” many natural objects are brought to life and given the opportunity to take on human qualities. For example, Mrs. Potts (Angela Lansbury) and Chip (Bradley Pierce) were actually humans but were turned into household objects due to a curse but were able to keep their personalities. A great example of how it’s easy for a child to think of objects as alive is the mother (Mrs. Potts) and son (Chip) duo in the movie.
Once the prince is finished with the two evil sisters, Cinderella comes out and while taking off her dirty shoe, her foot fits perfectly into the shoe. The prince and Cinderella are finally together, the prince knows Cinderella was the mystery women he had been searching for all along since her foot fit into the shoe. Cinderella and the prince return to his kingdom and live happily ever after. While the Disney story and the fairy tale version of the stories both end with happy endings the fairy tale is written with much more graphic images than the Disney
Beaumont’s “Beauty and the Beast” wrote in the long past ago or it might be the first version of classic one. In this version, at the end
Similarities and Differences between Cupid and Psyche and Beauty and the Beast The classic tale of Beauty and the Beast by Madame de Villeneuve and the story of Cupid and Psyche by Edith Hamilton share many similarities and contradictions. A commonality between both stories is that both main female role is renowned for their beauty. Another parallel is that the main male love interest lets his love go back to their loved ones which also leads to developments within the stories. However, there are many differences in each story as well.
One thing that differs from the story to the movie is the characters. While there are many of the same characters, such as the stepfamily and the birds, their personalities and roles change from the story to the movie. In the movie, there are many more animals that are included in the story. Instead of just helpful birds that appear in the book, there are also mice, horses, and a dog. The mice in the movie appear more than the other animals, and are more useful in helping Cinderella.
Finally, the original and the Disney version share a “happily ever after” differing only in the obviousness of the marriage; whereas, Beast breaks the mold of “happily ever after,” and allows for an unhappy