Introduction Corporate social responsibility is an organizational philosophy, which primarily emphasizes on the significance of focusing on the best interests of the entire society. Corporate organizations have a responsibility to assess the societal and environmental impacts they cause, apart from the achievement of their organizational goals and objectives (Coombs & Holladay, 2012). In the early growth phases, business organizations focus mainly on the achievement of financial goals. However, as the businesses grow, they interact with a wider range of stakeholders, and have a role to play in the wellbeing of their employees, customers, and the entire society at large (Hawkins, 2006). For this reason, there is a need for business firms to …show more content…
They suggest that mandatory compliance to corporate social responsibilities would elevate the costs of operations of the firms, which would negatively affect their productivity and profitability. This would be particularly viable when the management and workforce time in fulfilling the corporate social responsibilities are considered. The opponents also propose that the adoption of a compulsory model would lead a tick-a-box culture by the firms as opposed to the real realization of the benefits of the corporate social responsibilities (Lee & Kotler, 2011). Even though these arguments could be viable to an acceptable degree, the legislation of mandatory corporate social responsibility has more benefits that overshadow the two …show more content…
Also, the formulation of a mandatory framework of compliance to corporate social responsibilities would lead to enhanced awareness and contemplation of social and environmental effects of corporate organizations’ activities and operations. This is because the attention of the organizations’ management and personnel would be re-focused on sustainability, social, and environmental concerns (Coombs & Holladay, 2012). As a result, little violations of the legal regulations would be expected. This would lead to more benefits and well informed decisions made by the organizations in regard to the impacts they cause on the communities and environment they operate in, as well as their financial gains. Lastly, corporate organizations would be compelled to observe higher ethical standards, which would foster social stability and
Additionally, there is growing public awareness and demand for social responsibility, sustainability, and transparency in business operations. Companies that prioritize social and environmental impact, ethical practices, and stakeholder engagement can gain a competitive advantage and enhance their reputation. All these factors contribute to an environment of constant change and uncertainty, which requires businesses to be agile, innovative, and adaptable. Companies must be willing to adopt new technologies and business models, embrace social and environmental values, and respond to shifting market
Marketing and social responsibility By karim zidan : IAU Introduction Corporate responsibility policies have been gaining increasing attention from senior executives as questions of sustainability have come to imbue business all over the world. Nowadays corporations are struggling with a new role, which is to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of the next generations to meet their own needs. organizations are being called upon to take responsibility for the ways their operations impact societies and the natural environment.
Introduction The case of A.P. Smith Manufacturing Company v. Barlow has been used to cite an important rule of law i.e. state legislation can be applied to pre-existing corporations under reserve power. The company A. P.Smith Mfg. was incorporated in 1896 and is engaged in the manufacture of sale of valves, fire hydrants for water and gas industry. Issue In the case A.P. Smith Mfg.
Milton Friedman’s quote on “there is one and only one social responsibility of business---to use its resources and engage in activities designed to increase its profits” can actually be seen in different perspectives. Company can also be socially responsible by contributing towards the community through what they do best: excelling in economic terms (Brusseau, 2012). When corporations are making profits, most of it gets sent back into the economy and everyone benefits. Jobs are created, and those that already exist get some added security. More successful corporations mean the increase of the country’s economy, which in turn lead to a social benefit for the society that offers better living conditions.
Creating a strong business and building a better world are not conflicting goals they are both essential ingredients for long-term success - Bill Ford. In recent years, customers and employees have demanded corporate social responsibility (CSR) ethics, inclusion and diversity, reflecting that businesses should do more than meet the basic requirements for ethical corporate activities. Modern businesses are increasingly employing these concepts to encourage change for good and make a significant contribution to the world as they begin to acknowledge their environmental and social impact.
Modern day businesses have to be socially responsible; actions are taken to satisfy customers who might have a cause that they care deeply. Social responsibility occurs when a person or a company acts in an ethical and sensitive way towards important social issues of the day such as economic, environmental, and cultural concerns. Many businesses have a section of their website or business literature dedicated to social responsibility. Companies proudly detail the steps they are taking to address concerns that people have with the environment and economic issues. Having companies act in a socially responsible way is necessary because their actions have a tremendous positive impact on society.
PHIL 1404 Unit 1 Written Assignment XXX University of the People PHIL 1404: Ethics and Social Responsibility Instructor Dan Johnson June 14, 2023 Introduction A company establishes a social contract with society (that permits and facilitates a firm’s existence), allowing it to operate and conduct business (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). In exchange for this permission, the company is obligated to act in the best interests of society as a whole, not just its shareholders (Byars & Stanberry, 2018). This means that, according to the principles of the social contract, a company should contribute to the betterment of the community that enables its existence, benefiting both society and itself.
It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which states that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et. al.).
Trying to ignore the social responsibilities might stain an organization’s image and reputation. Thus, performing social responsibility is not simply a choice; it is a need of any corporation. In the twenty-first century, businesses are in the bottlenecks where globalization, science and technology advancement and integrated knowledge are taking place in today’s society (Chan, n.d.). To gain a foothold in this economy, image and reputation play an important role to differentiate a company from one another. With good reputation, it helps firms to create competitive advantage in the business environment.
Organizations have started incorporating corporate social responsibility into their policies. Innovation is needed in order to integrate corporate social responsibility and ethics into company policies (Torres, 2015). Both society and the business benefit from the incorporation of ethics in the operation of the organization. Companies tend to have more social responsibility when ethical codes are put into place. Organizations are now beginning to remove themselves from situations that may present a corporate social responsibility issue (Greenhouse, 2013).
Many companies strive to achieve goodwill of the brand name in its relevant industry. Competitors try hard to outperform each other in every significant arena. Organizations apply many techniques to surpass each other. Corporate philanthropy is a kind of a technique which many companies tend to follow. Corporate philanthropy is essential to make a change in a society.
Davis (as cited by Khalidah, Zulkufly, & Lau, 2014) defined Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) as “… the firm’s consideration of, and response to, issues beyond the narrow economic, technical, and legal requirements of the firm. It is the firm’s obligation to evaluate in its decision-making processes the effects of its decisions on the external social system in a manner that will accomplish social benefits along with the traditional economic gains, which the firm seeks. It means that social responsibility begins where the law ends. A firm is not being socially responsible if it merely complies with the minimum requirements of the law, because this is what any good citizen would do.” A firm will not survive without the support of both the stakeholders and shareholders, thus the CSR proposes the indication which stats that a firm can never exist In a vacuum (Khalidah et.
Environmental efforts: One primary focus of corporate social responsibility is the environment. Businesses regardless of size have a large carbon footprint. Any steps they can take to reduce those footprints are considered both good for the company and society as a whole. 2. Philanthropy: Businesses can also practice social responsibility by donating money, products or services to social causes.
Sustainability is part of the core values of the firm and ExxonMobil viwes CSR as a key componenet of sustainable development as shown in the figure above. In order to achieve this, the firm adopted 8points strategies that guide and measure the firm’s commitment to good corporate citizenship. These strategies include: • Integration • Investment and cost discipline • Operational excellence • Portfolio management • Project execution • Risk management • Technology leadership • World-class workforce Figure 2: Exxon Mobile Foundation Program Source: Exxon Mobile Corporate Citizen Report (2015) The figure above is an indication of how far the company has gone in her quest to be socially responsible. The firm has a foundation that gives grants
For 20 years or more the world has recognised that the way we do business has a serious impact on the world around us. Now it is increasingly clear that the state of the world around us affects the way we do business’ (KPMG, 2012). The continual call for businesses to be socially and environmentally responsible is due to sustained pressure exerted by a range of stakeholders, including customers, communities, employees, governments and shareholders (Eweje & Perry, 2011). Sustainability is a strategic imperative of the new millennium (Galpin & Whittington, 2012).