There were 127 medical malpractice cases in Pennsylvania last year. An example of these cases could be an exploratory surgery to diagnose a patient and the incision became infected because the patient failed to clean the incision sight properly. Seems to me that the doctor was just doing his/her job but in the end, he/she got sued. Medical malpractice can be described as an act or omission by a doctor or physician that lead to the harm of a patient (Kindy). Certain laws and bills have been put in place to discourage people from suing doctors for problems that are completely out of the doctor’s hands.
The Curse of Knowledge plays a big role in misunderstood communication between healthcare staff/physicians and their patients/family members (stakeholders), such as the case of the physician’s communication with Jesica’s family after it was determined that irreversible brain damage had occurred (Burns, Bradley, & Weiner, 2011). The Curse of Knowledge occurs when a communicator (sender of information - physician, in this case) begins to communicate a piece of knowledge to a listener (receiver of information - Jesica’s family in this case) that has no knowledge or understanding of what is being communicated. Medical terminology and explanations come from healthcare staff, such as physicians, nurses, and medical specialists who have been educated
Furthermore, a large number of patients considering euthanasia (623 patients in 1 year) (6), have asked about the legislations concerning euthanasia, suggesting that it may unknown among people. Altogether, it seems that there might be some confusion during the process of performing euthanasia illegally. As a result of such bewilderment, as suggested by a study, grief among families may be even more severe (7). This can almost certainly be alleviated by legalizing euthanasia, as well as setting a clear and more direct policy towards it, such as giving the option to the patient whose death is to be expected in the foreseeable
Occasionally the donor 's family will misinterpret the hospital bill they recieve. The expenses on the bill are always from the procedures the staff carryout while trying to save the person’s life, not the extraction of the organs. Before you say no to organ donation, make sure the reasons you don’t want to become a donor are valid. There are many organs you can donate after you are deceased to save other peoples lives. Organs that are donated after the recipient is dead are called cadaveric organs.
Libertarianism would suggest that, since you are unable to know for certain what the patient’s wishes are regarding the sharing of information, you should air on the side of caution and completely avoid sharing anything with their family. By doing this, you aren’t infringing on the patient’s right to liberty. If the patient felt that their past medical history was of importance and worth sharing, it is safe to assume that they would have done so. Based on this assumption, it is ethical to withhold any and all medical history that does not relate to their current medical
After the tests are inspected by medical professionals to determine the patient rational, the next safe guard is put into action. All patients considering euthanasia must make at least two spoken and one written request stating their wishes. At the time of the spoken requests, two non-family witnesses must be present to ensure no fake wills are created (Coster 25). Another precaution taken is putting age guidelines in place. A patient who is twelve years of age can request euthanasia, but parental consent must be granted.
After a medical ethics committee met and discussed the case and reported back to the doctor, the doctor proceeded with the interventions as the parents wished (citation). However, in contrast to the ethics committee and the doctors involved, Dr. Leon Cass, who was previously the chairman of the President’s Council of Bioethics and also the author of “The End of Medicine and the Pursuit of Health,” would disagree with this decision and his view would assert that it is entirely unethical for parents to modify the bodies of their severely disabled female children. According to Dr. Cass’s argument in chapter six of his book Toward a More Natural Science, his view of medicine would strongly disagree with the medical interventions performed on Ashley. To begin, Dr. Cass claims that one of the false goals of medicine is “’pleasure’- that is, gratifying or
One of the main arguments is that euthanasia could be an ethical issue and can be seen as assisted murder. Physicians are not forced to provide the euthanasia doses; the physicians who do, have agreed to do so. As well as the patient is asking to die, they are not being killed against their will. Another argument is that medical resources and money will be spent for a patient to kill themselves, when they can just commit suicide on their own free will. More medical resources would be spent on keeping that patient alive, than it would euthanize them.
This is an ethical problem due to the decision that may result in having to terminate the pregnancy. Another genetic testing that has ethical problems includes those people that are tested for predisposing diseases that either lead to later onset (in the case of adult patient) or adult onset (in the case of a child patient). This leads to many ethical issues such as whether or not the patient wants to know if he/she is at risk for a certain disorder. If they find out that they are at risk than they may become depressed and/or make better life decisions (about marriage and life). Others that find out that they are spared from having the disorder maybe relived however they maybe at guilt by seeing close relatives suffering from what could have possible than their
“Ethics is the study of how the society can think, understand, and examine its norms and practices with regard to living a moral life” (nathaniel, 2008). Abortion is a term that deliver prematurely, end of pregnancy were the result shows no childbirth due to many reasons, divided into the medical need or to the mother self perception, so is abortion an ethical issue? It is considered an ethical dilemma? There are many opinion about how and when abortion can conduct. A wide-ranging agreement present, however, abortion is acceptable in the limit of medical issues as a result of miscarriage, birth defects or when it’s danger on the mother health.