Before our founders contrived our Constitution, civilians have always distrusted those in higher powers with their money. As early as the Boston Tea Party in 1773, civilians wanted to implement a system to where their opinions were considered. Therefore, according to Shafritz, Russell, and Borick, they stated that, “Taxation and public spending must be voted for; they must have, in effect, the stamp of democratic approval” (2013, p. 473) However, in present day, this is not the way our government operates. Kettl states, “The Constitution explicitly requires that all tax measures originate in the House of Representatives, the body that the founders believed would be the “people’s house,” to make sure that citizens had a voice in their own …show more content…
However, as Kettl discussed, “While Congress has tried, especially since the mid-1970’s, to regain its earlier preeminence in the budgetary process, the president has held the upper hand over most of the years since” (2015, p. 305). Our founding fathers had dealt with situations to where they were not consulted on how their money was spent in the year of 1773, at the Boston Tea Party, and designed a solution to explicitly include the public in how our funds should be spent. I agree wholeheartedly with our founding fathers design approach and what it was trying to accomplish; therefore, I do not feel comfortable knowing that there is a black budget, or that Congress has lost its preeminence in the budgetary process. The Constitution explicitly made it our right to have a voice in our taxation, but we clearly have been stripped of this right through these top secret budgets. I want to make sure my country is spending my money appropriately and in something I believe in. If the country is taking part in situations they are afraid for the public to be made aware of, it only makes me question if what they are doing is moral and just, and if it is, then why is it not public
Raven, you are right. The British felt as if the colonies should accept the consequences for the colonists ' actions at the Boston Tea Party. As a form of punishment, the British passed the Intolerable Acts. The Intolerable Acts included the following: the Boston Port Act, which closed Boston 's port until the East India Company was repaid; the Massachusetts Government Act, which empowered the king to elect government officials in Massachusetts; the Administration of Justice Act, which allowed the government to move a colonist 's trial to another colony if a fair trial was unavailable in Massachusetts; and the Quartering Act, which permitted British troops to occupy vacant buildings when in the
Thomas Fitzsimons was born In 1741, in Ireland (exact date and place unknown) and died August 26th, 1811 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Fitzsimons and his family traveled from Ireland to Philadelphia, in the mid 1750’s. In 1763 Thomas went into the trading business, with his new brother in law, George Meade. When Parliament reacted to the 1773 Boston Tea Party with punitive measures, which the Americans called the Coercive Acts, Fitzsimons felt that if British warships could close the port of Boston, no city in America was truly safe. These concerns forced Thomas into the patriotic cause and politics.
Lee H. Hamilton, a former congressman in the House of Representatives, wrote, The Case for Congress, to share some of the criticisms he has heard over the years and to explain the effects of such opinions. Hamilton speaks of three main criticisms: “Congress is run by lobbyists and special interests”, “Congress almost seems to promote total gridlock”, and “There’s too much money in Politics” (Hamilton 2004). For each of these criticisms, Hamilton explains these thoughts and his opinion on the matter. The strongest point of Hamilton’s argument was in defending the lobbyists in Congress. Hamilton (2004) said the public opinion of lobbyists is that “Congress is manipulated by powerful wheel-dealers who put pressure on legislators and buy votes through extensive campaigns and other favors” (p. 83).
The Aftermath and Acts That Followed the Boston Tea Party Karla Valeria Gonzalez Formatted Rough Draft Mr. Isaac G. Pietrzak U.S. History 1301 November 4, 2016 On the Thursday in December 16th of the year 1773, several men began to dump what is now worth over a million dollars of British tea into the Boston Harbor. This later became known as the famous Boston Tea Party. The Boston Tea Party was basically the initial cause of the aftermath. The Intolerable Acts, the Continental Congresses, and battles following the Boston Tea Party were the beginning to our freedom.
I believe foreign policymaking between the President of the United States, and Congress is very challenging, both the President and Congress have to come to an agreement along with compromise; this struggle is a balancing act. Can the President ultimately be the dominant force in foreign policymaking without Congress approval? Or does Congress play a big part in foreign policy? The president has the power under the Constitution to serve as head of the state and head of government.
What if I said the Boston tea party was a major event in American history. For instance, did know the Britains were in major debt with France from the great war. Or how did the people in Boston to manage to overthrow the tea. How does the Boston tea party have an effect on today 's society?
The Boston tea party of 1773, to reduce tensions in the colonies, parliament repealed almost all of the Townshend acts. However it kept the tax on tea, British officials knew that the colonial demand for the tea was high despite the boycott . But colonial merchants were smuggling most of this imported tea and paying on duty.. 2 The Townshend act in June 1716 parliament passed the Townshend act.
Not long after the ratification of the U.S. Constitution, the American citizens began to disagree about how the United States should operate. They were conflicted about how much power the federal government should possess, as stated in Chapter 10 of History in the Making, which says that “at heart, Federalists and Republicans disagreed about how much power to vest in the central government or, conversely, about how capable the people were in governing
This source start with a month a month before the Boston Tea Party. It talks about what lead to the events that took place. The source is very descriptive and goes into the minor details. Like how there were handbills posted around town talking about how the ships carrying tea would be docked and that they should use it as a chance to demonstrate so resistance. It tells about the meeting that was held to discuss how they were going to prevent the tea from landing.
Prior to the American revolution, America was a cluster of colonies mainly ruled by the British government. Additionally, tea was very popular than coffee in the colonies at that time. Back in 1773, the British government ceased the Townshend Act on its American colonies but the Tea act; which was not accepted by the residents of the colonies as they still had to pay taxes to consume tea. This led to the famous incident, the so called “Boston Tea Party”, which inevitably led to the American revolution. Since then Americans switched to coffee instead of tea, as tea was distributed to the world from England via importing it from India and China.
The American Revolution was a political chaos or disruption that took place during the 1765 and 1784. The American Revolution was the point, were we learned to get better along with countries. This brought discontent, horrible lost, but independence. Seventeen years ago one of the major causes of the American Revolution occurred. One of those major causes was the Boston Tea Party.
To start off, the Boston tea party was one of the causes of the American Revolution But before we get into the Boston tea party, we have to know a few things about the French and Indian War. Basically Britain and France fight a war for control over North America from 1756 to 1763. Britain wins, however they went into a big amount of debt fighting in it. After the war, the government of the British decided that the American colonist had to help pay that debt.
Boston Tea Party The night of December 16, 1773, marked the day of the “midnight raid” which included the dumping of tea into the Boston Harbor as a sign of protest. Many factors came into play that lead to this event such as, the ridiculous taxes implemented by the Parliament, including the Sugar, Stamp, and the Tea Act. Tension had also been growing between the citizens of the colonies and the British redcoats that were stationed there at the time. All of these acts forced the colonists to pay excess money for everyday items like tea, paper, and sugar etc. The colonists believed that they were being deprived of their freedom and rights, so they rebelled against the Parliament by performing an event that would hurt the British economy.
The founding fathers wrote these documents in a time period with entirely different influences regarding how a government should be structured, such as a focus on avoiding imperial influences and monarchies, and one that was structured during a constant fear of war (Berkin 41). Additionally, the meanings of these documents are continually purposely misconstrued, and so should be regarded with caution as to the ways in which the writings can be utilized for personal gain in times where the original intentions are somewhat moot. Overall, however, the government is still one that draws its authority from the consent of the governed, so those who are elected to represent the citizens of the United States should keep in mind the true desires of its
Many Americans may have viewed the government as a source of comfort. It had provided them with services such as health care, a stable economy, security, and the ability to prosper (Cantor 281). Since the World War two era, we as a society have lost our trust in our government system.