I attended a Board ordered deposition of Dr. Louis Noce on your behalf in the above-referenced matter on 07/24017. Catherine Coyne was present on behalf of the claimant and our hearing reporter was Linda Engel. As you know, this is a controverted claim involving either an occupational disease or an accident to the neck. Please see my 07/14/17 report for a detailed history of the this case. As you know, we previously have taken the testimony of the claimant and a lay witness for the employer. We do not have an IME in this case but we are taking the testimony of the attending surgeon, Dr. Noce. Dr. Noce testified today that he was familiar with the claimant. He said he first saw the claimant at St. Peter’s emergency room just prior …show more content…
This also could have included shooting pain in both the arms and legs. I had the doctor confirm that he never received a history from the claimant of the discrete incident on 12/15/16. I tried to push the doctor off of his opinion on causal relationship, pointing out that there were two different histories of work related injuries but the doctor was insistent that it really did not matter because he felt this was really due to the claimant’s job. He said there might have been an incident that aggravated symptoms but he felt it was part of the heavy duty work the claimant was doing. The doctor did confirm that the claimant was released to return to work without any restrictions on 06/05/17 as he had an excellent result from his surgery. The doctor would not agree that the claimant’s condition could have developed without trauma or just by activities of daily living. He said there would had to been some more serious activity and he no history other then the history of the claimant’s work activities. So he felt that was the cause of the claimant’s
Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed.
The first claim was a specific injury claim dated 2/2015 with a second cumulative injury CT: claim from 6/2014 through 6/2015. The injuries in the specific claim stem of having injuries to the claimant’s back, lower extremities and a left knee claim injury. He said the second claim is a CT: 6/2014 through 6/2015 claim of injuries that stem from bilateral shoulders, back, lower extremities, left elbow, hands, fingers, legs, bilateral knees, stress, and anxiety. In his opinion, Witness Flores believes that the claimant is “retaliating” against him after he told the claimant sometime in 2014 that the claimants youngest sister, Juana Lopez Valadez was having an affair with a Pastor at a local church where the claimant 's family and his family attend.
Katherine Collier, 54, of Mt. Pleasant was arrested Sunday, March the 13, for driving under the influence. According to the Maury County Sherriff's Department report, Collier had been swerving in and out of her lane. After being asked to step out of her vehicle she told the officer that she was the City Manager and asked if he was trying to frame her, to which he responded by saying that he did not know who she was outside of that interaction. Collier then said "That's the deal, that's what's going on, but okay."
11. Similarly the reasoning for the refusal to disclose Dr. Rigney’s radiological reviews is equally misleading. While Plaintiff appreciates that Defendant Medic East has advised the court that Dr. Rigney will not be called as a witness in the instant matter, an admission Plaintiff intends to enforce should Defendant Medic East suddenly change their mind later, it does not change the fact that said reports were supplied to Dr.
Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted: Motion 12(b)(6). The first motion my office can file on your behalf is Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted in accordance to federal rules of civil procedure 12(b)(6). Upon reading the complaint, it was brought to my attention that the complaint lacked prima facie facts of the accident such as in what way
I wanted to give you the respect of a face to face explanation of the issues I found in your medical records, which I believe will make it impossible to recover substantial compensation in this matter. Since we have not been able to meet in person, I will briefly explain why I do not want to pursue this case. The UMDNJ hosptial record for your ER visit on April 7, 2015 indicates “patient states he is using crutches at home secondary to a previous left hip replacement that is recalled and he is waiting for surgery, he missed his step on a loose floor board in the house tonight and fell onto his left side.” You “complained of pain in the left shoulder and unable to fully abduct his arm and also has pain in the left hip area and left
SC placed call to Pa and spoke with Bill Pa’s spouse who reported that doing ok. But she has come combative lately and verbal abusive. Bill spoke at length about her behavior and the impact it has on him. Bill is offended when Pa makes disparaging remarks about him and calls him out of his name. Bill reported that he believes Pa needs a medication review and a change in meds.
An EMTALA Case Mary Carnahan HA 301 Legal Aspects Legislation in Health Care March 17, 2016 Introduction This research paper is about a case law for a federal appellate circuit for an EMTALA case. Describe the case and the EMTALA requirement(s) at issue. How does it relate to the professional standards a medical professional must follow?
Cerebral Vascular Accident Case Argument for Social Security Disability Income Determination I evaluated the following case study from Medical, Psychosocial and Vocational Aspects of Disabilities the fourth edition, Brodwin, Siu, Howard, Brodwin, & Du (2014) and presented a case argument including a vocational argument in favor of La Shaun Jackson’s award for Social Security Disability Income (SSDI). “La Shaun Jackson is a 59-year old African American widow with an adopted 15-year old boy who has a record of substance abuse and juvenile delinquency. She has worked as a Claims Processor for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in Fresno, California for over five years. Prior to returning to school to earn her Associates of Arts Degree in accounting,
On December 17, 2014, Plaintiff Howard Rote Jr., an inmate housed at the Western Correction Institution brought suit arising from various incidents during his incarceration at various institution within the Department of Public and Correctional Services. ECF Document 1. Mr. Rote’s complaint alleged a myriad of allegations but listed no time frames or dates for any of the allegations. In an effort to gain clarity regarding Mr. Rote’s complaint, undersigned counsel (herein after “State Defendant’s Counsel”) filed a Motion for More Definite Statement. ECF Document 10.
The court found the “Defendant's care of Claimant fell below acceptable standards of practice” (Stashenko, 2015). In 2009 a former inmate of the Hawaii corrections department was awarded close to $1 million in damages for an incident in 2003, in which the physician’s failure to give the correct type and dosage of antibiotic for an infection in his scrotum. This resulted in 6 subsequent surgeries and the removal of his scrotum, rendering him
Grace Costa, a victim of domestic abuse, has two versions of the story that happened on Christmas night in 2012 when her ex boyfriend broke into her home. In the first story, her son and daughter were at home eating dinner. In the second story, only she and her daughter ate dinner that night, but it might have been 2013 instead. For some reason, there was a half-eaten apple on the kitchen floor. As Costa describes the night, she cries and stops and continues describing it in disjointed phases.
Kenneth was found to not have this illness after examination but was the examination correct with its findings. Kenneth claimed to have been lying about having the illness after
It It f It frustrates me what Dr. Anna Pou had to go through with the lawsuits of the Memorial Medical Center incident. As Healthcare professionals, being sued for making the rightful decision for the patient and the hospital is unjust. Healthcare professionals like Dr. Pou, have taken the Hippocratic oath, and one of the promises made within that oath is “first, do no harm”. Hospital’s should not be so quick to make such an important decision of pressing charges to their faculty; more trust should be placed in them. In addition, she made it clear her intentions were just to ‘‘help’’ patients ‘‘through their pain,’’ on national television.
Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.