Cesar & Mandela “The significance of Cesar’s life transcends any one cause or struggle.” this means that (what Cesar had achieved from whatever his people were doing was hard like a struggle ) -Cesar Chavez Cesar Chavez was a mexican-american , who fought for human rights. Also he was a good farm labor leader & a community organizer. Nelson Mandela succeeded with helping people from his country and became the first black president in Africa. Even though he got arrested for his political activities, many national supporters were helping him with his fight against apartheid.Cesar Chavez & Nelson Mandela were both successful for what they did for their people.Mandela & Chavez were both great leaders.The difference between Mandela and …show more content…
Also in the story it's said that Robert F.Kennedy described Cesar Chavez as “one of the heroic figures of our time.”That is one way proving that Cesar was better than Mandela. Also his various victories for Unions.Chavez legacy was to help anyone achieve their struggle. Cesar also influenced and inspired millions of Americans from their struggle of life.Mandela was a successful leader to but the story isn’t that convincing. Even though Nelson Mandela did help a lot of his people he wasn't quite having problems about laboring and his people dieing just because they didn't have good conditions to work in the field , like Cesar had to go through that . Although Nelson Mandela had to go through people being racist because of skin color or religion or just because they were different , yet many people were feeling bad and were hurt because they had feelings. The people weren't just thinking right but , not many were dying because of this conflict , but in About Cesar many had lost their lives for fighting for the human rights and supporting. Cesar chavez was more persuasive because he helped and inspired millions to fight for what was right . Also Chavez made them feel that what their was it was important especially to the farm
Cesar Chavez and Harriet Tubman are both very successful people who fought for people’s rights and succeeded. The poem “Elegy on the Death of Cesar Chavez” by Rudolfo Anaya is about how Cesar Chavez who had fought for migrant farm workers’ rights in America is being eulogized by Rudolfo Anaya and what Mr. Anaya portrays in this poem is how much he is missed. Harriet Tubman’s biography “Harriet Tubman and the Underground Railroad” by Ann Petry is about the things she was taught as a child and the skills she developed. Both of these people helped other individuals and they reached their goal. Although, Cesar Chavez made a larger impact on the world we live in.
King on the other hand, created social change through numerous movements and his outspoken nature. He always addressed his aspects reflecting on visions of a collaborative society. He consistently defended poor workers, and this is what led to his assassination in Memphis. Chavez built social movements and changed the nature of labor in the southwest. This made him to be regarded as the greatest organizer and leader in the history of the Americans.
What made Cesar Chavez and effective leader. Effective means successful. Cesar Chavez was a successful leader because he was in the group that he was supporting aka of the people, with the people, he was persistent, and he was willing to sacrifice. Cesar Chavez was a successful leader because he was involved with the people that he was leading.
Cesar Chavez, a first-generation American, latino farm worker born in Yuma, Arizona, is a true American hero. At the age of 10, his family lost everything they owned due to the Great Depression. From the age of ten, Chavez migrated throughout the southwest working in the fields, where he was exposed to the hard work of a farm worker. Getting paid very low wages, while working in an extremely uncomfortable environment he got little sleep. Growing up in a hectic environment, he always had a true passion of helping others earn what they deserve.
Cesar Chavez is an honorable hero that we should be all inspired by his accomplishments. After Cesar Chavez started working as a farm worker, he started to care about how people were treated at work, especially the poor and people of other nationalities. He believed that everyone should
Some would die due to the horrible working conditions such as no water, no breaks, and harsh labor. For these struggles to end farmers needed a new leader to fight for them and that 's when Cesar Chavez came along. When Cesar Chavez came along and took control he became an effective leader because he was willing to create a union, expose the working conditions, and his methods of boycotting. One of the reasons why Cesar Chavez was an effective leader was because he created a union.
“Cesar’s motto, “Si, se puede!”...” (Cesar Chavez Foundation, 2012). Cesar Estrada Chavez was a Latino Civil Rights activist. He spent most of his life fighting for the rights of migrant farm workers. The actions he took changed the law, and gave the workers the rights they deserved.
Cesar Chavez was a Mexican-American farm worker, his social and economical status was one of the worst in the U.S. society at the time, in contrast, he strived and succeeded in his goals, he reached sky high for his thirst of equality and rights for the minorities, nevertheless achieving this through peaceful, non-violent tactics, he fought for several causes and people, Chavez was a force to be reckoned with because he never gave up and he was never afraid of the consequences of his decisions because he knew what he was doing was right, and this mindset made all the difference when it came to sacrifice what you had for the wellness of others. Chavez had a difficult childhood, as many Mexican-American immigrants, he struggled with money problems during his childhood, Chavez was born March 1, 1927 in Yuma, Arizona. His family owned a grocery store and a ranch, but their land was lost during the Great
In addition, referencing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the text further established Cesar Chavez’s ethos. King was someone who was revered by proponents of civil rights. Associating an audience with a prominent figure such as Dr. King adds to the credibility in the rhetor. Chavez uses the main persona of a human
A man of the people for the people. Cesar is a hero to many because he was a great leader, many even compared him to MLK. he knew what had to be done and exactly how to achieve the goal of getting it done. Cesar Chavez was a extremely effective leader because three main reasons. He had courage and bravery, he had a clear goal and a way to achieve said goal, he was also extremely persistent.
Martin Luther King, Jr.” Cesar Chavez made a great impact on the people there that day. This speech, along with many others that he gave, were to influence people to not purchase food that was grown using pesticides. There were many people getting sick, including children, and some had even died from cancer. Chavez, along with many others, were able to greatly change people’s views on topics.
Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr “You must not lose faith in humanity. Humanity is an ocean; if a few drops of the ocean are dirty, the ocean does not become dirty,” Mohandas Gandhi quoted. I have extremely admired Gandhi because his whole life be worked and fought for India’s Independence from the British Empire. Also another important person whom I have respected is Martin Luther King .Jr who attracted many people to his cause by delivering his speech “I have a dream.”
NELSON MANDELA Nelson Mandela is one of the influence people in the 20th century politics. He was the first black president of South Africa from 1994 to 1999 and elected by fully representative democratic election. He was also a politician, an activist, fighting against HIV/AIDS in Africa, promoting global peace and South African anti apartheid revolutionary. One thing that he did for the Africans and affects the world was about to end the apartheid, a system that try to separated the races of black skin over white skin people in South Africa. Because of him right now there is no differentiate between those people again.