The colonies of New England, the Chesapeake, Middle Atlantic regions had differences such as values, groups of people, and health status; however, they also had some similarities such as the people living there had been pushed and pulled from Old England. The three regions of British North America
The early Virginia and New England colonies differed politically, socially, and economically due to the situations that the settlers faced. Throughout many of the letters written about some of the experiences of the earlier settlers, one can easily see a major difference in the way of life of the two colonies. Although many of these colonies differed in the way of life, each colony faced some similar things that they each had to overcome. These challenges made a massive difference in the way that each of the colonies started out and directly influenced the future for both colonies. When these challenges are faced, many of the settlers will create the foundations of their political, social, and economic systems.
In the text it states, “ ...over half a million African slaves are shipped to Brazil and other New World colonies to work on sugar plantations.” (Testere, 3). This quote means that more slaves are being used because people are wanting more sugar to be created. This connects to the claim by explaining the effect sugar has on the society and how more work is needed. In the text it also says, “ … The slave trade was a major factor in the expansion of the sugar industries. … The growing demand for and production of sugar created the plantation economy in the New World…” (Shah, 7).
It was fortified for protection, but not so much that it could hold off long sieges. (Frey 1) Surrounding the manor house were the houses and buildings of peasants, as well as a wall used for protection. (Frey 1) The manor was self-sustaining, meaning that it grew or produced everything necessary for it’s survival. An outside product was rarely necessary. The manor works this way because of the peasants who worked on it, many with a specialized profession such as a blacksmith or carpenter, who produced for it.
When human beings started to settle down in groups and live at one place for an extended period, the population started to increase. Increased productivity and population size lead to a scarcity of land. Individuals with land were wealthier than those with little or hardly any land. To ensure the success of their lineage, males wanted to pass on land to future generations, however, land is not as highly valued in polygamous societies. The ownership of land became increasingly critical in the agricultural societies and since it was much easier to pass it off to a single heir in a monogamous marriage people started to give preference to it (Glaeser 20).
The economic benefits came to Europe from the ability of Europe to tax tobacco sales that were done to Native Americans, as well as the selling of tobacco in Europe itself (Colonial Tobacco). This is important because it allowed Europe to have a control on trade, as well as benefit the most economically. Another positive effect the trade of tobacco had on Europe was the finding of rich land for Europe to thrive on for farming and trade. It is said that Virginia held great land for farming which allowed farming of more tobacco and other products to put on the trade market to Europe and for Europe to thrive economically on (Modern Farmer). The idea of Europe finding rich land in Virginia through tobacco trade is important because it allows Europe to continue thriving economically from the colonies as well, as a boom in immigration to the land from other potential farmers, which grew the colonies and the
From Europe some commodities were distributed throughout Asia. Some states thrived under the trade, while others economically deteriorated so drastically that they continue to suffer today. Despite the consequences, the trade connected the world closer than ever before. A main reason why Europeans colonized the New World with such swiftness and determination lay in the drinks of nobles and the soil of peasants. Sugar was in high demand during the 1500s and 1600s, and the fertile coasts of the Carribean and Brazil made for a perfect environment.
So, it can be said that S. Martin Lipset made a comparison between early America and today’s emerging nations to find issues mutual to them as new nations. This was absolutely a new type of nation-state, since its people were not all of the same culture, ethnicity, and language, as had been supposed to be the incident in the previous defining of the concept of nation-state. S. Martin Lipset is also focusing on American’s later historical periods, picking for discussion as critical incidents, religious institutions and trade unions. Ultimately, Lipset is comparing the developments in political area in multiple industrialized democracies, including the United States. However, when a nation is building another nation/s may be destroyed.
Before John Rolfe came, the new colony was looking at failure. Rolfe brought the fine crop of tobacco with him in hopes to save Jamestown from the debt that it was in. Tobacco saved Jamestown because it helped get Jamestown out of debt, it brought new settlers to Virginia, it was extremely easy to grow and grew exceptionally well in the fertile soil, it was the beginning of large plantations, people back in Europe became a main purchaser of the tobacco, and without tobacco Jamestown would have failed as a colony. Before John Rolfe Came to Virginia, Jamestown was in very much debt. “The risk was larger as the colony might fail.
Diversification of agriculture is described as the economic development of non agricultural activities (Start, 2001). A diversified agricultural economy generates the needed opportunities in the rural areas. Soil fertility can be increased by way of crop rotation. It adds value in the agriculture by increasing the total crop productivity and at the same time stabilizes the farm income by minimizing the risk associated with only one crop. Diversification in India has become the need of the hour since majority of the farmers in India have small landholdings and their income from crop cultivation as well as non farm income is not sufficient to meet their subsistence level.