This essay will discuss the cultural relevance of the Greek Parthenon and the Roman Pantheon, as well as their functions in the societies which built them. Concepts of the functions of each building will be discussed before moving on to an assessment of similarities and differences between the two. Research summarized within the following paragraphs was obtained from Silverman and Wikipedia (n.d.; 2016). The Parthenon served multiple functions in the years after its construction. The primary purpose of this structure may be said to have been worship of the patron goddess of Athens, Athena. It was built to replace earlier temples which had been destroyed at the site. Such function demonstrates the incredible importance of the goddess to the Greeks. This testament is given not only by the size of the temple, but also its impeccable construction. The style of the building is of the Doric order, yet also …show more content…
Both featured columns and impressive stepped entry ways. Each featured statues and relief sculptures depicting well known myths about the gods and their affairs in the world of men. Both symbolized a right, by the endorsement of divine association with the capital cities, for these societies to advance their own ambitions and to conquer all within their reach. It is clear that the Parthenon in Greece and the Pantheon in Rome may have been the product of distinct societies, yet they both symbolized similar virtues within the people who commissioned, built, and utilized them. These two structures had much in common in not only function, but also in style. They are a valuable example of just how much an effect the two neighboring cultures had on one another as power shifted between
On our field trip to the Getty villa this semester, we had to choose an art piece that stood out to us among the many there. The task at hand seemed easier than it was, as there were many art pieces that held my attention. One thing I kept in mind was that many of the Greek art pieces were either recovered from the bottom of the sea or were Roman duplicates. This meant finding background and details about them would be challenging. Of the art pieces, the Statue of Hercules or the “Lansdowne Herakles” was the one that I chose to write about.
This structure demonstrated communal identity through a Greek myth, because of Zeus and the goddess, Nike, in his hand were mythological gods. Through this statue, Olympia was able to demonstrate their greatness in comparison to Athens, because the same sculptor, Pheidias, and the same materials of ivory and gold, were used in the creation of the cult statue of Athena, at the Parthenon in Athens. The statue in Olympia was only one meter taller but depicted Zeus in a sitting position. This position of Zeus made him much taller than Athena’s statue if they were both standing. Panhellenically, the statue brought the attention of how great Olympia was in comparison to others, because of their capability to honor their patron god in such an extravagant manner.
In the opening paragraph, she states that “This chapter investigates the dialogic character of such layered interventions in the sacred places of the Roman region in the Republican period: the interactions among the natural topography, the surrounding built environment, the architectural constituents of the place, the infrastructure, and the ritual performance,” (Moser 14). In this section of the book, she focuses on the Sacred Area of the Republican Temples at Ostia as well as the Sanctuary of Fosso dell’Incastro located at Ardea (Moser 14). Moser begins by explaining how these sanctuaries differ from others from the Roman Republican era by emphasizing that their architectural layout is distinctive, indicating that these sanctuaries must have been used differently; she also discusses the possibility that these sanctuaries were used for multiple deities, a wide variety of worship practices, as well as a marketplace (Moser 15). Furthermore, Moser explains the significance of the interior and exterior borders of these sanctuaries in relation to how they provide evidence as to how people might have practiced their religious practices at these sanctuaries.
Greece is well known for its works of architecture such as the Temple of Zeus and the Parthenon. Trade brought an influx of new and reimagined design to the front doors of Greece. Older works of architecture where made of wood and mud-brick. These didn’t seem to be a permanent structure more like a base for future references. As time progressed so did the architecture, more building, temples, and homes sprouted across Greece and became more permanent.
An extravagant architectural building: with almost absolutely no straight lines throughout the building itself, a forty foot high statue of Athena stands inside of the main room, and eight columns surround the outside. Throughout the article “Deep Frieze,” Daniel Mendelsohn talks about the parthenon, Greece’s most iconic temple, to be one of the highly controversial buildings of it’s time proceeding into some lives of today. He states “When we look at the Parthenon today, we are looking at a building that began life much as One World Trade Center did-as a monument to a national cataclysm. “By now of course, it is one of the most iconic structures in the world….” (Mendelsohn, 34).
Although this may not be factual, their legacy continues to influence the world through its creations, many centuries later, despite their eventual collapse. However, their rise to rule over the known world can be attributed to the cultural values they held to long before their mark was made on the world.
Two very important historic buildings from the Greek and Roman civilizations, namely the Parthenon and the Pantheon respectively, are worthy of academic exploration. An analysis of their function and style will help to put their design and features into perspective, and create a better appreciation for their emulation in Western civilization. These buildings possess very unique individual characteristic designs, which bears testimony to the societies from which they originate. However, they are also a resourceful database of knowledge in terms of their symbolism, rich heritage of their era and application to the present civilization.
The soil that the Erechtheion was built on was known as the most sacred area of Acropolis. The start of The Erechtheion’s construction was in the Golden Age, 420 BCE and ended in 406 BCE and sadly only a couple years later, Athens fell to Sparta. The Erechtheion was built to house the religious rituals that another old building had. The eastern part of the Temple was dedicated to Athena, while the Western part was dedicated to the local hero Boutes, Hephaestus and the other Gods and heroes. The Erechtheion had many different functions like housing newer and older cults and was the site of the “Sacred Tokens”.
At this time there was the reconciliation of the North and South, and freedom for the black which were shown in the murals done by Jules Guerin. The Parthenon corresponds to its period because it shows the Greek’s struggle against the Persians. It is shown in the myths, which outlines human suffering for Greek victory. It is seen in the shield of Athena, which shows the battle between Athenians and Amazons. The Parthenon was built in great detail depicting event that lead to Greek victory.
Both buildings are dedicated to our own version of a ruler. The Lincoln Memorial was dedicated to President Lincoln. The Parthenon was dedicated to the Greek Goddess Athena. Another thing they have in common is some of the
The Parthenon and the Altes Museum have been significantly important architectural buildings throughout this whole period of time. The Parthenon was built between 447 and 438 B.C in the Acropolis of Athens in Greece, by Iktinos and Kallikrates. It represents the culmination of classical Greek architecture and its search for perfection. The greatest German neoclassical architect Karl Friedrich Schinkel (1781-1841) designed the Altes Museum in Berlin, which was opened in 1830. In his design, Schinkel linked architectural motifs from Greek and Roman antiquity and incorporated them into the museum.
Greece and Rome, two ancient societies, both influenced many aspects of modern life. Their advancements were utilized in many later cultures. They influenced almost every part of today’s world, such as government, language, and architecture, as well as making scientific advancements. Also, the successes of these two civilizations lead to many countries modeling most of their public facilities and systems after the ones found in Greece and Rome. Ancient culture strongly influenced modern culture by means of language.
If you have never had the opportunity to see the Parthenon in Greece and the Pantheon in Italy, it’s possible that the similarity of the names would lead you to believe that they are the same or, at least, almost identical. While it is true that certain elements of the buildings mirror each other, there are major differences in their structures and functions. The architecture of each reflects the cultural ideals of the times. After the Greeks overcame the Persian invasion, Athens became the head of all of the Greek city-states. During this period, the country enjoyed peace and great prosperity.
In this piece of work, it is essential to compare the two buildings while systematically considering their similarities and differences that have memorialized their existence until now. Similarities between Parthenon and Pantheon The Parthenon building in Athens was built and dedicated to the goddess Athena while the Pantheon was also built and similarly dedicated to all the gods of the Romans; hence they are referred to as temples. Furthermore, both buildings were used for public events when such need arises. The Parthenon and Pantheon are both ancient buildings and have strong big columns holding the building as well as serving as decorative pillars.
Ancient architecture preserves history Two historical monuments with extraordinary architectural stories are rare to find still standing to this day. The Parthenon and the Great Pyramids of Giza are perhaps two of the most magnificent pieces of architecture the world has ever seen. In order to creates a better understanding of the importance of the two ancient structures the differences and similarities of the Parthenon and the pyramids constructions, functions along with relevance both then and now must be explored. The Parthenon and The Great Pyramids of Giza both share some similarities about the creation process behind them as well as some differences.