Dealing drugs is one of the uncongenial ways to make money to take care of the family. Sometimes people must do what they must do. Yes, this does have implications for sociologists. The reason considers the impact that certain products like crack cocaine have on local communities. Crack and other drugs also set many impoverished communities back because of the catastrophic effects of addiction or imprisonment (Levitt).
When deciding the best time and place to commit a crime, perpetrators think through these elements precisely. Since they wish to avoid detection, criminals will frequently blend in with the crowd. If a criminal is going to steal from someone and sees a law enforcement officer around, he or she is less likely to commit that crime to avoid trouble. Routine Activities Theory argues that crime is a routine function of peoples’ lives which white collar crime can be used to dispute this
The term net-widening is a term that describes all other options that allow criminals to stray away from incarceration or diversion programs to help perpetrators stray away from the court. The primary purpose for net-widening is to decrease the number of criminals going to court. I do think that net-widening is a legitimate concern because there are a few negative effects. Net-widening allows for an increase of control over the majority amount of people. This idea does not reduce the desire of a convicted criminal to re-commit a crime.
Others would say that they think it keeps young offenders from committing crime twice, that it will teach youth how to receive punishment, some would say it keeps crime out of the system etc. The reason why they are wrong because they haven't looked at the facts, they just looked at good experiences with YCJA foundation. An example I have a friend and my friend stole a car from a person in a community and crashed my friend had to pay for the damaged property, for the car and had to apologize to the people my friend stole the car from, after the whole process my friend did the same thing over repeatedly, what's the point? Well, all I think is that the YCJA is a waste of time but you don't have to because there are good things about it too it helps kids stay off the street and in homes even if its a group home. In my opinion, a group home, foster care anything like that is traumatizing toward kids in the program.
In a nutshell, situational crime prevention theories assume that greater opportunities lead to more crime also, easier or less risky opportunities attract more perpetrators. Situational prevention theories are greatly influenced by other sociological theories on crime such as rational choice theory, routine activity theory, and crime pattern theory among others. According to rational choice theory, offenders focus on suitable targets while weighing the risks and benefits of their criminal activities in the absence of effective controls before committing any crime. For example, an armed robber will target a wealthy family who have a poor or weak home security system as against a less wealthy family who live in slum notoriously known for lynching criminals. Routine activity theory on the other hand, argues that crime occurs due to the existence of three main variables.
Since the show is based on reality and real police officers it has more of a stance on showing what police officers do and how they actually go about catching bad guys. While the show isn’t entirely accurate or reliable it does give some scene for what the job is like. The TV show does some false ideas that people tend to fall pray too. Idea such that African Americans are more likely to be arrested than white Americans and that all the people arrested end up charged with some kind of crime which isn’t the case. Since the goal of the show is to provide an idea for what cops do, one would think that the depiction of who is arrested and what goes on is accurate to at least some degree.
The crime control model believes that punishments for crime should be strict and severe but also be quick. The purpose is to demonstrate to criminals that if they do commit a crime, it won’t be easy for them to get away without being punished. This model isn’t intend to scare people or criminals but it is intended to discourage criminal actions as it shows that the outcome for crimes is a severe punishment. The crime control model also has a goal to put cases through the system quickly rather than having them go to trial because it takes too much time and can also reduce the efficiency. This process also encourages the expansion of court powers if necessary.
There are loads of theories on crime and why people commit them. If I had to pick a favorite one I would pick rational choice theory. Rational choice theory definition is the view that people behave as they do because they believe that performing their chosen actions has more benefits and less costly than living a legal life. That is, people make rational choices based on their goals, and those choices govern their behavior.
The conflict theorist proposed that the rich and powerful create regulations and law enforcements carry out these laws. The concept of the ‘stop snitching’ in our society denote the rich and the powerful. For instance, powerful criminals in some of these communities get away with crimes because they know how to cover their tracks by silencing others by giving them financial assistance. The powerful and visible criminals reward those who keep silent by providing financial assistance to them and promising to protect them in the mere future (Venkatesh, 2000; Wilkinson,
Although this amendment is not common in today’s lifestyle, it is still an important one. The seventh amendment is important to citizens because of the fact that it involves a jury with a noncriminal lawsuit. This means that two people can go to court and the argument will not be about a crime. The eighth amendment declares protection on citizens from paying outrageous fines and protects citizens from cruel and unusual punishments even if the citizen is guilty of a crime. This right preserves basic humanity on criminals and other citizens because a person is a person no matter what they have done.