Referring to Table 1, the reactants for each run were transferred to an Erlenmeyer Flask (250 mL) via a buret. Using a precision pipette, the volume of I3- required for each run was carefully extracted and poured into the flask containing all of the reactants. Immediately after the Iodine solution was placed in the flask, the LabQuest began collection data. Meanwhile, a small portion of the solution, was used to rinse the cuvette, then using a disposable pipette a small amount of the solution was transferred to the cuvette (approx. ¾). Placed the cuvette sample in the Sprectrovis. After each run, the temperature of each sample was collected (to nearest 0.1°C). Disposed of the sample solution, cleaned the cuvette with DIW and repeated the latter procedure using the correct volumes for each new run from Table 1. …show more content…
After all data was collected, the equation M1V1= M2V2 was used to determine the initial concentrations of each reagent in each run. [Note: The final volume (V2) for each run was 11.0 mL or 0.011 L]. Used the volumes and given molarity concentrations illustrated in Table 1 for M1 and V1. Below, Table 2 shows the finished initial concentrations for each reagent in each of the four
Question3: Experiment 3 The unknown acid sample was 1 • Monoprotic Acid Trails Initial NaOH solution (mL) final NaOH solution (mL) The volume of NaOH to titrate the acid (mL) Amount of Unknown Acid sample 1 (g) The moles of the Unknown Acid (mol) Molar mass of the Unknown Acid (g/mol) A 3.38 28.31 24.93 0.150 0.0026 57.69 B 0.18 29.32 29.14 0.175 0.0029
Next, about 10 mL of both solutions, Red 40 and Blue 1, were added to a small beaker. The concentration of the stock solution were recorded, 52.1 ppm for Red 40 and 16.6 ppm for Blue 1. Then, using the volumetric pipette, 5 mL of each solution was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask, labelled either R1 or B1. Deionized water was added into the flask using a pipette until the solution level reached a line which indicated 10 mL. A cap for the flask was inserted and the flask was invented a few times to completely mix the solution. Then, the volumetric pipette was rinsed with fresh deionized water and
In a clean test tube 8.9ml of deionized water, 0.1 guaiacol, and 0.1ml enzyme solution. There was not supposed to be anything that happened after doing this so move to the next step. Next was adding 0.3ml of hydrogen peroxide, then cover it with dura-film to invert the solution. Then fill the cuvette 2/3 full and put it in the colorimeter. So at this point the stopwatch should be ready to start time then record results every 15 seconds.
With a ben pipette, keep removing the distillate and placing it into a 0.5 dram via labeled “Fraction 1” until 1.2 mL of collection. After collecting 1.2mL, raise the the heating block temperature to about 105-115 C higher and the collect 0.6 mL of solution placing to a 0.5 dram via labeled “Fraction 2.” Now, remove the distillation apparatus and allow it to cool – there is 1.2 mL of liquid left in distillation conical via, place it to via labeled “Fraction 3.” Do the gas chromatography analysis and then dispose the fraction 2 and save fractions 1 and 3 for the next day experiment. Finally, Gas chromatography analysis is done using gas chromatography and LabQuest
The lab started off by measuring critical materials for the lab: the mass of an an empty 100 mL beaker, mass of beaker and copper chloride together(52.30 g), and the mass of three iron nails(2.73 g). The goal of this experiment is to determine the number of moles of copper and iron that would be produced in the reaction of iron and copper(II) chloride, the ratio of moles of iron to moles of copper, and the percent yield of copper produced. 2.00 grams of copper(II) chloride was added in the beaker to mix with 15 mL of distilled water. Then, three dry nails are placed in the copper(II) chloride solution for approximately 25 minutes. The three nails have to be scraped clean by sandpaper to make the surface of the nail shiny; if the nails are not clean, then some unknown substances might accidentally mix into the reaction and cause variations of the result.
This lab’s end result was to correctly identify each unknown solution using prior knowledge of chemical properties and the results of the first experiment conducted. Unknown solution D was the only colored solution, being blue while the others were clear. This made it easy to then match D up to Copper Sulfate because of its color. As unknown A and B were added together, lots of gaseous bubbles formed and revealed the fact that that reaction was the reaction between Hydrochloric Acid and Sodium Carbonate because it was the only reaction that produced a gas release. Unknown A and C produced the only yellow, brown precipitate just as the reaction between Sodium Carbonate and Silver Nitrate had previously.
In order to determine the value of X, the hydrate is heated on a burner to undergo decomposition reaction to be decomposed into CuSO4 and water vapor. Water vapor is evaporated during the reaction, leaving CuSO4 crystals, which is supposed to be white, in remain. By weighing the mass of CuSO4 and the mass difference of substance before and after the reaction, the mole of CuSO4 and H2O can be calculated. The value of X can thus be determined by calculating the mole ratio of CuSO4 and H2O. In the lab, through calculation, the value of X is determined to equal to 5.361211229, which is close to 5.
Regarding reaction 4, the duration was changed to 480 seconds. After the Styrofoam cups were restacked, 100mL HCl was added. The lid was added and the probe was instered. A watch glass was weighed, then weighed again after scooping on 1.0g MgO. After 3-4 readings were recorded, the MgO was added with the spatula, which was stirred constantly with the stir bar. The watch glass was weighed again with the remains of the MgO. Reaction 5 did not use the stock solution.
Using two test tubes, label one “s” for substrate and the other “e” for enzyme. The substrate tube should contain 7 mL of distilled water, 0.3 mL of hydrogen peroxide, and 0.2 mL guaiacol and the enzyme tube should contain 6 mL of distilled water and 1.5 mL of peroxidase. Combine the materials of the substrate and enzyme tubes, mix the two using a clean transfer pipette, transfer a portion into a cuvette so that the cuvette is about half-full then cover the top of the cuvette with Parafilm and then place it in the spectrophotometer and record absorbance. Remove the cuvette and repeat recording absorbance at 1, 2, 3, and 4 minutes. Be sure to mix the cuvette and clean its surface with Kimwipes before each reading.
The resulting Au rate was .0004. Cuvette 6 was placed in a bath of warm water at 35 degrees Celsius, reaching an Au rate of .001. Cuvette 7 had am Au rate of .00001, and was kept at 85 degrees Celsius. The suggested pattern is that the extremes reduce the Au
Part A When sodium was added to water, the sodium melted to form a ball that moved around on the surface of water rapidly and hydrogen gas was produced. Because of the amount of heat liberated during this exothermic reaction, the hydrogen gas ignited the sodium with an orange flame while floating on the water. Also, when potassium was put onto the water, the observation was similar to how sodium reacted towards water. The metal was also set on fire, with sparks and a lilac flame. But, in the case of speed of tarnishing between the two elements, potassium was faster than sodium.
3mL of the liquid in each of the vials were added into cuvettes and measured in the spectrophotometer. Before each time point the photo spectrometer was zeroed using a cuvette with 3mL of distilled water. If any of the results were considered unusual the machine was zeroed again and the sample was retested. The results from the spectrophotometer test were recorded in a table. The experiment was repeated six times to gain a sample size of six.
Using the equation m = ΔTf/Kf , the molality of the unknown solution was found. Then, moles of unknown were calculated, which was used to calculate the average molar mass of unknown. Theory: After the experiment was completed, the data
Once that baseline was created its reaction rate was collected and recorded using a spectrometer. For the experimental variable (boiling enzyme) the measurements were the same as the baseline. Before the two test tubes were combined, both test tubed were placed in a beaker on a hot
Introduction Chevron Phillips Chemical Company is the major producer of Cyclohexane. This successful company hoses the three largest cyclohexane plants in the world. Many are puzzled by how the production of cyclohexane seems to have become stagnant. Perhaps this is due to the cost of benzene increasing or the demand increasing. Through thorough investigation, the answer to this question and many more can be answered.