Absolutism and Democracy are just two of the many forms of government. Absolutism is also known as an absolute monarch, this is when a ruler has complete authority over the government and the lives of the people. Democracy is also known as a democratic government, this is a system of government in which the people hold ruling power. These forms of government are both very effective; however, I believe that a democracy was the most effective during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Voltaire, John Locke in Two Treatises on Government, and Montesquieu in The Spirit of the Laws are some of the supporters of a democratic government.
Example of democracy is the type of government in the United States. Strengths as democracy: In democratised countries the people have the rights who are elected into any form of government office. These elected person officially make the decisions based on the people want and in the best majority of people. They represent the citizen of country in a way that they could not do for themselves. If someone has an issue or something that they feel should change then they can easily access their local elected person at their office and that person can help them with their problems and guide them through the steps they need to take to get it to the next level of government.
Most communities today rely on a basic form of government whether it be a democracy or a monarchy. If government was taking away the simple fact can be argued that chaos would break loose or people will naturally be peaceful. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes both delved into the ideal government of the people. Both agreed in a form of government should be established to keep some kind of peace, but both ideas differed in the way the government function. After analyzing both philosophers, it should be that a government should be established based on human's nature to sin, but Locke’s ideas are perceived to be more developed in a realistic government applied today.
“Of course democracy, so-called government of the people, is a lie; but the lie always binds the liar and limits the extent of his arbitrary power. Of course, the "sovereign people" is a clown of a sovereign, a slave with a crown and a sceptre of paper maché” (Malatesta, 1924). This statement, is one of the major criticisms of democracy made by the anarchist called Errico Malatesta, he thinks that although democracy is better than other types of regimes, it is an oligarchy in which the government of a few only benefits a privileged class. Furthermore, he rejects the parliamentary system, the way in which elections are held and how political parties are formed, as well as the recruiting, voting and application of laws, concluding that “even in the most democratic democracies it is always a small minority that governs and imposes its will and interests by force”. Following his ideas we can confirm that if the autonomy and government of the people are wanted, it must ensure that there
There are several mainstreams forms of government, why democracy is regarded as an ideal form of government which agreed by the majority? Winston Churchill even said before, “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others.” Though democracy is an unsatisfactory form of government, it is better than dictatorial government or oligarchy, especially in ancient times. There are not too many civilizations accept democracy as the form of government, but it was first practiced in Ancient Greece. Although at that time, only free men were counted as citizens, not included women, children, or slaves, vote was first developed in Ancient Greece. Five hundred names were drawn from a pool of all name of Athens citizens and those people could have a chance to make new laws and change old laws, then all citizens of Athens needed to vote for those laws.
These forms of Government are the similarity in their style of governance, power is in the hand of the few individuals by hereditary or usurpation, it is an unrepresentative system of governments, unlike the democracy, where power is in the hand of the citizens. The example classical democracy is the ostracism system in Athens. “Each year, citizens could write the name of an undesirable politician on a piece of baked clay called an ostracon. If a person’s name appeared on 6,000 ostraca, he could be exiled,” (Farah & Karls, 1999, p.
This is a system in which representatives are directly elected by the citizens, and these representatives then make political decisions for the people, with the assumption that their decisions will reflect the general will of the republic. This can be compared to a direct democracy, in which the citizens directly vote on all issues of importance. In authoritarian and totalitarian political regimes, one person, entity, or party has complete control over the affairs of the state, without the input or consent of the population. In totalitarian regimes specifically, this leader attempts to control all aspects of a society, including things like the personal beliefs and morals of the population. These are sometimes accompanied by a cult of personality around the leader or leaders, as in the case of Adolf Hitler, the leader of Nazi Germany.
Another disadvantage of plutocratic government is pushing inequality to a far tougher level. As it said above, plutocrats govern a country in the way beneficial to them, which means they use laws to increase their wealth absorbing it from the nation. This makes a distressing situation in a country far more distressing, and may end up as ‘slavery of poor people’. Because if people 's wealth continually flows to
DEMOCRATIZATION IN AFRICA INTRODUCTION The call for freedom and democracy echoes around the globe. Every citizen wants to be a part of decision making in matters involving his or her state. Most of the countries which are developed turned to democracy for their own good. There are two government systems in the modern world, democratic where citizens participate in the rule of the state and the other one is totalitarian, where the citizens are denied the right to participation in decision making. The countries that don’t have democracy are being criticised by the first world countries.
An Exploratory Study on Media Influence and Its Effect: An Analysis on the Media Influence and Its Effects on Bersih 4.0 Movement in Malaysia Abstract This study aims to determine the development of mass media and their effort paying in influencing on the public opinion. This article will also bring across to discuss on how the media playing around the society to bring effect on the social and cultural changes on the public opinion and their behavior specifically on the politics site to fight for democratic society. People will shape their opinion which get from the media information and it would bring people connected with each and another where they will develop shared similar interest through the content in the social media. An issue on