Disparate Treatment In Hicks's Prima Facie Case
This is exactly the case with Hicks and should be presented to the courts to support his position of disparate treatment in this case. In fact, the courts found that Hick’s did establish a prima facie case, and that the preoffered reasons by St. Mary’s were not believable. Yet, they also ruled that Hick’s did not prove that the decisions were racially motivated, but could have been personally motivated. Therefore, personally motivated decisions, while not best practices, are not unlawful and do not constitute discriminations by the company. The concerns with this type of decision, is that it makes it much more difficult for plaintiffs to prove disparate treatment in the future. The courts expect victims to be prepared to provide strong …show more content…
Hicks reported other officers’ violations of institutional rules, but the claims were ignored and no action was taken). Additionally, Hicks could present the fact that in his six year tenure, he had never been disciplined or suspeneded. His performance records could be presented to show that he had been a satisfactory worker and there were no issues with his performance. Moreover, it is important to substantiate a claim with true and legitimate proof. This can be accomplished by keeping a journal with names, dates, emails, comments, anything that can be used to support the case. Also, write down specific details of the discrimination instances even noting why is falls under the category of discrimination. If someone else witnesses the instance, be sure to write down the person’s name, what was happening at the time, and who else was present. Keeping detailed notes and journals are a great way to document the situation in the case of
Case Study: Grutter V. Bollinger
379 Words | 2 PagesThough in Grutter v. Bollinger we deal with the 14th amendment of the Equal Protection Clause and racial classifications too, the way race is used is slightly differs. In this particular case, the court had to decide whether the use of race at the Univeristy of Michigan Law School during the admissions process violated the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th amendment. Barbara Grutter, a Caucasian applicant, applied to the University of Michigan in 1996 with a 3.8 GPA and a score of 161 on her LSAT. Grutter was placed on the waitlist, but was subsequently denied admission to the school. Grutter claims that she was only denied because of her race, as the University uses race as a factor in the admission process.
Griggs V. Duke Power Company Selection Criteria And Analysis
600 Words | 3 PagesThe company claimed that the requirements were necessary to meet the qualifications of the position sought after, but it was later proven that those positions did not require those requirements. Mr. Griggs legal defense team claimed that “In-deed, the white employees hired before the requirements were imposed performed entirely satisfac-torily.” ( NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, 2016). Duke Power Company selection criteria was obviously flawed and wasn’t in accordance with the meaning of the Civil Rights Act. Their selection criteria limited people of a certain race and created a division among social classes.
Case Study Of Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas
625 Words | 3 PagesAfter carefully reviewing the oral argument and brief of case 14-191, Abigail Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, I was impressed how well the plaintiff attorney argued her defense during the trail. The litigations were as stated, in 2008, the UT Austin enrollment department wrongfully denied admission based upon the school considered race discrimination in its admission process because Fisher was a white female student, and because of her inadequate academic achievements. Fisher lawyer focus adequately on the highlight of the case by persuading the court that she would have gotten accepted into the university if she wasn’t stereotyped on such matters: race, top 10 percent student, grades, test scores which she refer to as personal achievement index. UT at Austin attorneys really didn’t have much leading factories to propose a concrete objective. In the argument Fisher attorney used the Justice Powell‘s example on Bakke system to support is statement.
Gregory G. Garre Esq's Oral Argument
182 Words | 1 PagesFisher v. University of Texas at Austin, No.14-981. Transcript of Gregory G. Garre Esq’s oral argument on behalf of the Respondent. Pg.51, lines 10-13, & Pg.55, lines 7-9: Back in 2002, from a class of 8,000, there were only 272 black students enrolled; 90% of the time, it is typical for a normal size classroom of to have zero to one African American student. Id. General Donald B. Verrilli, Jr. agrees that in the event of two applicants’ criteria are exact alike, their race factors does “not necessary” matter in the admission office’s decision making. “The increasingly fierce competition for the decreasing number of seats available for Texas students outside the top 10% rule results in minority students being under-represented, and
How And Why Do You Believe These Actions Were Discriminatory
353 Words | 2 PagesWhy do you believe these actions were discriminatory? The first case file with EECO by Tanya Conde girl friend of Samuel Varriano Maintenance #3 who was fired from Pitt University .The defendent 's in case Robert Godzik, William Franicola supervisor and Pitt University was dismissed . Now Robert Godzik and Pitt University have confidence themselves this isn 't a hostile work environment .With
Supreme Court Case Study: Fisher V. University Of Texas
591 Words | 3 PagesFisher, but they held the the Court of Appeals did not hold the University’s admission policies to a standard of strict scrutiny so the judgement was incorrect. In previous judicial precedent in cases dealing with minority admissions, the Court has held that they are reviewable under the fourteenth amendment, these such cases must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny to determine whether the policies are precisely tailored to serve a compelling governmental interest. If the policy does not meet this standard, then race can not be considered in any admissions process. The Court stated the it was the job of the reviewing court to verify that the University policy in question was necessary to achieve a more diverse student body and the any race-neutral alternative would not achieve the same level of diversity. The Supreme Court said the lower courts did not conduct a sufficient strict scrutiny examination in this case.
Thomas Strained Relationship
730 Words | 3 PagesDuring the 2014 evaluation cycle Det. Thomas developed a strained relationship with some patrol officers, as he included irrelevant material in reports, in a manner to shine light on other officer’s deficiencies. He was instructed not to utilize narratives in that manner but document in memo form and advise. I was also provided information from the prosecutor’s office that they did not like Thomas’s approach with them in reference to warrants, or prosecution of cases, and the feeling as though he was trying to tell them how to do their job. It was then requested that all requests come from me in the communication process as they did not feel as though they would receive cooperation from Thomas.
Unit 5 Bereavement
547 Words | 3 PagesWhen I asked Robert Hoffman to start at 5:00 a.m. to avoid the harassment fromMichael Niehenke and Donna Myers requested denied. C. When Harry Feals and I work together we have Julie Godzik, Robert Godzik, Brain Weaver and Michael Niehenke . These employees have stared at us until Mr. Franicola come after they called him Other employees are aloud to work together 8. Of the Persons in the same, or similar situation as you who was treated worse than you? Harry Feals Maintenance # 1 Harry Feals Maintenance #1 Mr. Feals received 11 weeks of Work for false allegation filed on pitt alert line, now he is seeking professional health with counseling to help cope with working at Pitt at Greensburg. .
Fisher II Case Study
1060 Words | 5 PagesPart III applies the Court’s precedent to the University’s affirmative action policy and concludes that the policy violates the Equal Protection Clause. Part IV examines the impact of Fisher II on existing affirmative action policies and concludes that the Court’s holding will be narrowly crafted and thus negligibly impact other policies. In addition, Part IV asserts that the Court’s affirmative action jurisprudence should be fundamentally altered because it fails to adequately guide lower courts, legislatures, and litigants concerning the permissible scope of affirmative action policies. As discussed in Part IV, a more effective—and honest—approach would be to acknowledge that: (1) diversity is an essential part of ensuring inclusion in higher education and the workplace; (2) remedying past discrimination is a compelling state interest; and (3) in limited circumstances race may be a dispositive factor in the admissions or hiring process. The Court’s current framework, although well-intentioned, ignores these realities and tries to quantify the role of race in admissions – a task that is impossible and
Why Is Tom Robinson An Unfair Trial
645 Words | 3 PagesIn the news today, the biggest things are the killings of African Americans like Mike Brown, and Eric Gardner; and how their lives didn’t matter because they are black. In a novel written by Harper Lee, To Kill a Mockingbird, Tom Robinson is accused of raping a nineteen year old girl, and he is given an unfair trial just because of his skin color. Depending on what kind of situation someone is in, their character and personality are going to change. Most people are just going to want to finish their job and get it over with and go home, but then when they are put under pressure they snap and can’t focus. Other times they might be the most caring person out in the world, and is trying to help people out.
Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee On Fairness And Diversity
620 Words | 3 PagesThe Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Fairness and Diversity (n.d.) also contend that people’s views depend on their biases on whom side they will take. They may see one thing in a positive way or vice versa. In addition, the Florida Supreme Court Standing Committee on Fairness and Diversity (n.d.) provided seven ways to recognize the biases of judges in courts.
Ricci V. Destefano Case
398 Words | 2 Pages“The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race,” Chief Justice John Roberts stated this on the Supreme Court case of Ricci v. DeStefano. This case, which was on the issue of discrimination of African American firefighters in the city of New Haven, Connecticut, isn’t the only one of its kind. Brown v. Board of Education, Korematsu v. U.S., and Batson v. Kentucky are just a few of many. Cases like these, the situations in Ferguson, Missouri, Baltimore, Maryland, and Sanford, Florida, have all occurred because of racial discrimination.
The Hiawatha Robinson Case
175 Words | 1 PagesIn my opinion from reading the conviction of Hiawatha Robinson case, I honestly think that he was guilty of the murder of his 8- year old daughter Hiawayi. The FBI and police had gathered so much information on Hiawatha that they could finally charge him of 1st degree murder of his daughter. The FBI had fingerprints, phone records, and even witnesses saying that Hiawatha was the last person to see his daughter alive. To murder your own daughter I think you have to be heartless and evil, especially a child he age of eight. Everyone expects Robinson to be sentenced to life in prison, meaning if he was eligible for parole he would get it after spending 24 years in prison first.
The Case Of Plessy Vs Ferguson
623 Words | 3 PagesPlessy v. Ferguson had upheld segregation of our society. This case was in Louisiana a southern state, which had enacted a Jim Crow law the Separate Car Act which made whites and blacks have to ride in separate trains. Mr. Plessy was a mixed race man who was mostly white and was arrested for sitting in the all white train and refusing to move. This happened in 1892 and Plessy was brought to Criminal Court in New Orleans, where Judge Ferguson had upheld the law. Plessy challenged this ruling and was brought to the supreme court of the United States.
Standardized Testing Bias
1523 Words | 7 PagesAt least four Supreme Court justices believe that affirmative action is unconstitutional. Chief Justice John Roberts has said that “the way to stop discriminating on the basis of race is to stop discriminating on the basis of race”. This viewpoint offers no differentiation between “race consciousness” and “racism”, but is a quite common opinion. This sort of viewpoint is what may drive America towards class-based rather than race-based affirmative action. Because of the disparities in income and wealth, minorities are as likely as whites to benefit under a class-based policy.
More about Disparate Treatment In Hicks's Prima Facie Case
Case Study: Grutter V. Bollinger
379 Words | 2 PagesGriggs V. Duke Power Company Selection Criteria And Analysis
600 Words | 3 PagesCase Study Of Abigail Fisher V. University Of Texas
625 Words | 3 PagesGregory G. Garre Esq's Oral Argument
182 Words | 1 PagesHow And Why Do You Believe These Actions Were Discriminatory
353 Words | 2 PagesSupreme Court Case Study: Fisher V. University Of Texas
591 Words | 3 PagesThomas Strained Relationship
730 Words | 3 PagesUnit 5 Bereavement
547 Words | 3 PagesFisher II Case Study
1060 Words | 5 PagesWhy Is Tom Robinson An Unfair Trial
645 Words | 3 PagesFlorida Supreme Court Standing Committee On Fairness And Diversity
620 Words | 3 PagesRicci V. Destefano Case
398 Words | 2 PagesThe Hiawatha Robinson Case
175 Words | 1 PagesThe Case Of Plessy Vs Ferguson
623 Words | 3 PagesStandardized Testing Bias
1523 Words | 7 Pages