The current imbalance due to the information the government has on us and the lack of information we receive from the government must be mended and this right will do just that. It's a right that must be built upon and expanded because of the recent growth in distribution and creation of information and data. Many countries have updated or interpreted their constitutions to support the right to access official information. So as this right is coming to attention internationally it has its place on the home front in the United States. Our freedoms must be protected and this right gives us the freedom that we deserve to be a part of this system and to have a say in our governance.
Since the PM gets his power from the conventions of the responsible government, it is subject to its interpretation. For instance, to interpret them, the policy precedents built up over time based on the various political practices, work of scholars, and lastly the court rulings in applying precedents must be studied carefully. Although the Governor General has a lot of power individually, while at the same time assisting the PM, he/she follows the advice of the PM, in terms of when
The press includes any form of media that can inform others about current events, some examples of press are newspapers, radio, the news on your television, and much more. The freedom is included in our First Amendment, and the clause forbids the censorship of the press. This means that the government is unable to control what said by the media. This helps citizen be informed about political problems, even though they may not be the best for elected officials. A quote from Thomas Jefferson explains freedom of the press, “...
A person could argue that freedom creates its own problems and that people are at times abusive of these. However, we live in a country that has these freedoms so valued, it can be found in our national anthem. While there may be always abuses made upon it, we can only hope that the United States will always continue to be the land of the free and the home of the brave. Understanding the importance of freedom and why we have to continually fight for it, is to look at all the ways it has been fought for.
The first amendment is very important for United State citizens. Freedom of speech is one of the most important rights. Freedom of speech grants us rights to say what we want without getting in trouble with the law. This law is important because it allows us to express our opinions. Freedom of religion is another right that is very important.
Being a US citizen has its perks, but knowing the amendments to the Constitution is something every citizen should consider, especially the first. Freedom of speech is one of the most important. If people want to share their opinions on how the government is doing, they are able to do so without the fear of getting in trouble with the law. It’s also a way to defend one’s self from courts but in an unharmful way. Freedom of religion is another right to the amendment that is also very important.
In a democracy, freedom of speech and the press must be accorded great respect, but other values such as national security, the protection of reputation or public safety sometimes conflict with First Amendment guarantees. Discuss the approaches that have been used by the Supreme Court to define the limits on expression. How have these approaches been applied in specific cases? Several restrictions have been formulated on expression.
It can be seen from different angles since many countries are determined to live in a free expression society but others want to enforce censorship in many situations. Countries that are against censorship is mainly because it can be very powerful in the sense that it can control what is shown on the news. It may present false statements and mislead the people in to believing things that are not true. If censored, everything would have to pass first through the government, and they may change some stories to please them. This can lead to only showing favoritism for certain brands or groups; companies may get to control the information that gets to the country.
Besides an individual enjoying the protections of free speech, commercial speech is also protected (Hall, 2014). The billboard is artistic, visual, and written, which are all protected forms of speech (Hall, 2014). Although it is more regulated, especially commercial speech as it applies to politics, the advertisement would be protected so long as it is not obscene, threatening, or compromise a valid interest of the government (Hall,
But the positive interaction of government-press-society does not mean that each party must lose the function of its functional idealism. For if each existence is not approached with independent and interdependent responsibilities and obligations, it can be ascertained that each party will not be able to assume its rights and responsibilities. It means that the government should be given authority, as an authorized and responsible body to regulate the interests and spheres of its citizens. The press must remain authorized to carry out its distinctive social control functions.
Otherwise, the government could take advantage and compromise these liberties in the name of security and general welfare. The amendments in the Bill of Rights can save people’s life and yet revoke in the same. Amendment I, II, and IV are the best examples to support that.
However, it does not mean that the government cannot control the media, because media is a public good. For this reason, the government has the power to regulate the social media. Opinion leaders and mass media have a big influence on molding to the public intention, because they provide the information, knowledge, and news to the public. However, the media is also bias. There are many social medias talk about one issue, but each media has different interpretation about the issue.
In the Constitution Freedom of the press protects the right to obtain and publish information or opinions without government censorship or fear of punishment. One regulation I thknk the government should have on freedom of press is if an article is deemed as slander or violates a federal law than I think the government should be in control. However, if we allow government to control this freedom completely than how would we know if the news was legitimate or just what the government wants us to hear. In totalitarian regimes to create rule, the government inevitably controls the information to which the public can access. This is a huge problem to because it allows the government to determine what is worthy of the news.
In the United States of America, the citizens are told they have protected freedoms. In many ways this is a very true factor, but the more time goes on it would seem the less serious the government takes these freedoms. If these freedoms are not respected as they should be there may be various problems arise from this. It is believed that Religious freedoms should be more protected, because of the founding fathers’ views, the first amendment, and the rights of citizens in the United States.