Obesity rates in America go up every year. As stated in Food Research and Action Center, The obesity rates have doubled since the 1970’s. The percentage of overweight or obese people is at 68.5%. Many have blamed the fast food restaurants for this. The new LPC cafeteria, “Fresh and Natural”, decided to remove all fried foods and sugary drinks from it’s offering, perhaps because they prefer not to be blamed for making people obese. Although that would be a good idea, I disagree that they should get rid of those foods because there would be many complaints and it is really the peoples decision whether they want to eat the fried foods or not. It should not be the cafeterias responsibility. Even though removing the fried food and sugary drinks could be a benefit and helpful to many people, it could be upsetting to a lot of the students. There are some students that have faster metabolism and they don’t gain much weight when eating unhealthy foods, which is a benefit for them. There would be a raise of complaints growing and hardly anyone would go into that cafeteria. There would be only few people, for example people who are athletes or people who really watch what they eat. Instead of getting rid of the high-fat foods, “Fresh and …show more content…
Worse, it leads to “stigmatization,” which can lead to eating disorders, love self-esteem, and bad body image.” If the new LPC cafeteria got rid of the unhealthy foods, it could be problematic for the people around because they might think it is because of them and that they eat too much. Getting rid of the food wont really solve anything, it will only lead to less business and people will still be able to buy unhealthy foods elsewhere, like the bookstore, where they sell all kinds of snacks. However, leaving the foods there will not change anything, leaving less complaints, and more
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
I strongly believe that the cafeteria menus should be changed in order to have a fair and much healthier lunch. Money may be an issue but there are plenty of ways to solve this world wide problem in the schools. Before there wasn't as much diversity and most people would have agreed to choose from two options what to eat. Now there are vegans, vegetarians, and plenty of allergies that could cause problems for someone
The Truth of Obesity Fast food has been around for decades and it is an industry which will continue to grow, it is because of this main reason why so many Americans are now obese. Along with the lack of education and knowledge that many Americans are decrease their life span. However, obesity has never been such a vast problem as it stands today with its large population of uneducated and fast food hungry Americans. With this massive epidemic that is taking over America, comes many health issues and its targets begin with the children who become addicted to unhealthy but satisfying meals suffering from overweight, high cholesterol, and blood pressure to name a few.
The high obese population can be explained by culture, portion sizes, food companies and restaurant policies, diets, and traditions. Obesity is not only an individual issue; it is most importantly a national matter. It raises both individual and collective problems related to economic and demographic dynamics. Therefore, based on the alarming rate obesity is growing, it is crucial at this point to find a solution in order to slow down and hopefully stop this epidemic. Comparing diets of different countries and taking a look at the background story of American nutrition and regimes, it is clear that the American diet is very different from other nationalities and has worsened over the decades.
Burger King, Mcdonald’s, Taco Bell familiar restaurants, that America knows the most. On an average week these fast food places are feasted on regularly rather than a home cooked meal. The first generation to die young of obesity related diseases. Life expectancy has gone down increasingly to now an alarming 78 years of age. Back in the 70’s the word obese did not even exist, food chains had small portions and families ate at the dinner table.
Throughout the years many people have come to the conclusion that bigger is better. Bigger houses, bigger cars, more lavish vacations, but what about us? Food has become something that is fast, easy, and a crutch to many people. However, everything has its limits, and while other countries are becoming more health conscious, Americans seem to become more set on fast food joints. Therefore, skyrocketing our obesity epidemic to damaging levels.
It has come to my attention that obesity has become a very large problem in America. It is a sad sight for sore eyes to walk down the street and see the mass population of the United States spilling out of their clothes. These people have done this to themselves and it’s time for the United States to take matters into its own hands and stop giving into those that just cannot stop eating. As I have been turning this over for some time, I have found a way to solve not only obesity, but also much of the hunger in America, all the while creating jobs. The solution is simple, and I guarantee you will not find many that would disagree with this proposal.
(Morgan Spurlock, 2004). Today, approximately 35% of the 20 years old and over are considered overweight and this scourge is visible on children too and more than 10% of adults in the world are considered as obese. At the head of this globalized trouble, America, birth place of fast foods. This major worldwide drawback is infecting more and more people every day, provoking
Junk food is responsible for the growing rate of obesity. This is outlined by David freedman in his article of “How junk food can end obesity.” David Freedman has credited the “health-food” motion, and followers of it along with Michel Pollan. Freedman claims that if the America desires to stop the obesity epidemic, or at least reduce its effects, they must shift to the fast meals and processed meals enterprise for assist, now not the “health-food” movement.
Obesity has reached new levels in recent years for “despite years of efforts to reduce obesity in America, including a major push by Michelle Obama, federal health officials reported Thursday that the share of Americans who were obese had not declined in recent years, and had edged up slightly.” (Tavernise ) The rise in obesity is matched by increasing controversy over who is ultimately responsible for keeping Americans healthy. Should the government step in and be the parent who forbids bad choices when it comes to eating? Or should every person determine their own path when it comes to nutrition and eating healthy?
We tend to choose the cheaper, faster, and better tasting food. So when you take that choose away it could make some unhappy. That is going to be inevitable, because some will be unhappy if the menu is not changed. Eating food from the new healthier menu can make students more alert in class.
The entire day is composed of students being herded in masses to and from classrooms and eating the awful food. America needs to rethink how high schools work, and the best way to start is to allow open-campus lunches. Allowing students to leave campus and purchase their own food gives the students the freedom to make choices. This is a freedom every American has and is the basis of capitalism. Plain and simple, cafeteria food is disgusting.
Studies show that overweight students tend to have more problems with learning and paying attention (Miura). Many parents also fear that children would have the chance to skip school of get into drugs and alcohol while they are loose for their lunch break. People of the communities have also expressed their fears of increased traffic and increased risk of traffic collisions (?9 Primary Pros and Cons of Open Campus Lunch?). Not only can open lunches cause health problems, but they can lead to other dangers such as a car crash or
If the food’s quality is refined, the students won’t be as wasteful and more students will buy the food. Also because the school will have control of what is served, those with food allergies will be acknowledged and food for them will be guaranteed to be served. The schools will be reimbursed more money and the students will be eating healthier food. Not everyone will agree with my proposal, but I believe the student’s futures are far more important than the amount of extra money the school districts will have to pay to guarantee they receive fresh healthier
OUT WITH THE SCHOOL FOOD IN WITH FAST FOOD Hold you ever questioned why we could not have McDonalds for lunch at school. Although some people say that fast food will make you fat, but we say school food is disgusting and awful. They think it cost too much money. Well is it beneficial for you? Is it because it cost so much money?
Cafeteria food in schools is made to be healthy for students, but is it really healthy for students if they think it is foul and do not want to eat it? Should schools change the healthy foods to foods that students would actually want to eat? School food’s job is to be healthy and tasty to get the students through their day, but sadly school lunches tend to miss the mark on both accounts. Public schools rely on money from the government to supply food to their students, but due to several cutbacks the thing served in the cafeteria is hardly food at all. We all know the stereotypical school food mystery meat Monday or a slab of grey mush and sadly that is not too far from what it is in reality.