Upward mobility refers to the how and why people or families change position in the class structure, which examines the degree of openness whether the society consists of equal opportunities, and social fluidity. By disagreeing the statement of ‘Hong Kong is still a place full of opportunities for upward mobility’, this essay will explain Hong Kong is a place of not full, but limited opportunities for upward mobility, is due to the perception of own social classes among population, government’s lack of effective social assistance and increasing household expenditure among poverty population in recent years, through the aspects of unequal educational system, social polarization, and opportunity structure for youth. The unequal educational system is indicated through the statistics from Working Family and Student Financial Assistance Agency (WFSFAA) and Times Higher Education: World Universities Rankings, as well as …show more content…
The unequal educational system can be seen in WFSFAA statistics, that the percentage of local students studying in eight government-funded universities and …show more content…
The grant provided by WFSFAA are assessed under the two-tier means test about the calculation of Ready Reckoner calculating Adjusted Family Income (AFI) and Sliding Scale of Asset value (SSA), and it follows the restriction of amount of family members, which WFSFAA limited AFI thresholds for amounts of family members. These assessments indicate WFSFAA’s restrictions on amounts of grants to different circumstances, that Hong Kong’s Poor population and poverty rate of single-parent households is 35.8% in 2015, which only 64.2% of students in maximum might have the opportunity to enjoy full grant under WFSFAA. Furthermore, students with average family income
For example, “the wealthiest 10 percent of U.S. school districts spend nearly 10 times more than the poorest 10 percent, and spending ratios of 3 to 1 are common within states” (Darling-Hammond). In wealthier, suburban areas, most students have the resources available to benefit their educational needs, including; projectors, computers, and calculators. In contrast, “at MacKenzie High School in Detroit, word processing courses are taught without word processors because the school cannot afford them” (Darling-Hammond). For students coming out of lower income communities, it is more difficult for them to attend college, or excel because of the lack of academic preparation. Now not only are many Americans not getting a good education, but as a
Although the national government wants students nationwide to receive the same education, they lack much needed skills for a student. The disagreements on education should be handled between the county and state governments. Not the national government. Controlling the education rights the state governments have is one example of
By introducing statistics such as this one, Darling-Hammond strengthens her argument within her article that a major gap in education funding causes students to achieve at different
Have you ever wanted to chase the American dream? It might be more impossible than people realize. Gregory Mantsios writes “Class in America-2012” about the growing and obvious class divide in America, yet no one wants to talk about the situation and the effects on the people. I will be analyzing the text and explaining the effects it has on the reader. Throughout the article Mantsios stays consistent with his opinion by providing multiple charts and graphs to back his point.
Macke Reymond, in the video, “City Club”, describes how it is unfair to compare schools by achievement scores, without taking into account the demographics of the students. Factors that can affect overall achievement include poverty, race, special education, and English language learners. “Student’s come to school with different types of education endowments based on their backgrounds. They might have differences in their basic command of English, vocab, phonetic awareness, numeracy, and so on. These differences in knowledge affect the absolute level of knowledge they have, both when entering school and continuing on.”
Additionally, the author mentions that according to the professor’s research, the “score gap between American students and those in the highest-ranked countries” decreases by “25 percent in math and 40 percent in reading” once adjustments for the student’s socioeconomic status have been made. However, this problem is getting harder for public schools to solve as “[t]he public school population is getting poorer”. Porter then introduces Andreas Schleicher, the top educational expert of O.E.C.D who runs the PISA tests, as Schleicher firmly disagrees with Professor Carnoy’s claims. According to Professor Carnoy’s results, “fewer than 15 percent” of American students should be from families of lower socioeconomic status, but Schleicher found that “65 percent of principals in American schools say at least 30 percent of their students come from disadvantaged families”.
These disparities include low educational attainment, high
Unequal Education In Schools The American dream has always been conceived as the abundance of opportunities that the United States has to offer. One of these includes the offer of equal and quality education for all kids, no matter who they are or where they come from. But the startling truth is that schools in the U.S. are NOT equal: some kids receive a high- quality education, while others do not. What is the reason for this, may you ask?
Students with higher quality education will have the tools to be successful in the future. But, students with poor education won’t have the resources to be successful in their future. School quality and differences in education is the starting point for economic inequality, says John Powell, expert on structural
This has caused a disparity of opportunities compared to people living in previously green-lined areas because it creates an educational gap between high and low income communities. Schools in neighborhoods with high poverty rates have fewer teachers and staff which leads to bigger class sizes. Students are less likely to focus on their studies in a class with more than 32+ students since the classes are often unorganized and distracting. Also, teachers in underfunded schools are more likely to have lack of experience in the field than an advanced degree. Without quality teaching, low income students are left behind in education and struggle to keep up with their work.
" (page 228). Classes were based on education, wealth, and social status. While moving up to a higher class was difficult, "the examination system provided a modest measure of social mobility." (page 219).
Martha Peraza SOC 3340 Inequality in Education California State University, Bakersfield Abstract In the United States, there exists a gap in equality for different demographics of students. The factors contributing to educational disadvantages include socioeconomic struggles, gender of students, language or culture, and particularly for the scope of this paper, race.
According to the 2011 ACS, (Automated Collection System), the median household income of Dane County’s African American families was $20,664, less than 1/3 the median income enjoyed by White families ($63,673). These statistics showed the problem of income disparity between black and white families. This income disparity might have negative impact in all domain of the black population life such as education, healthcare, etc.…. Years ago, United States (U.S.) Public School was one of the best places that gave opportunities to children from different background and race to come together and be educated. However, with the occurrence of income inequality among Americans, the education system has changed profoundly in the way that today there is
Definitions of Equity and Equality: According to the dictionary the term equity implies to the “quality of being fair and impartial”. While equality is the state of being equal; correspondence in quantity, degree, value, rank, or ability. Equity vs Equality in Education The terms "equity" and "equality" are often misused and interchanged when referring to educational equity.
Therefore, in a stratified society, the individual’s opportunities are always determined by his or her social class. In this essay, I will be arguing that even though mobility exists in the social class system, the opportunity to change status is relatively open for everyone but the distribution of opportunities among the members of a social class is not relatively equal to all. I will demonstrate this point by showing how participation of an individual in a specific social class will decide the opportunities in terms of attaining education and achieving a well-paid job. Education has a significant role in promoting social mobility; it enables people to acquire knowledge and certain skills in order to promote their social status. Nowadays, people believe that societies are based on meritocratic