Epidemiology is to study disease and other health events in the public. A society’s public health, prevention of disease, and healthy life style choices are the corner stones of the epidemiology field. As is with everything, ethics are devised to help ensure the best interest of each community during studies of this field. Studies whether observational or descriptive studies or surveillance to aid in progression of public health need to be done safely and goal oriented so that each study abides ethical responsibility. Some of the ethics to be considered, but not limited to are core values, confidentiality, and respect.
Core values were expressed in each required reading. One main goal of research among epidemiologist is to improve the public’s
…show more content…
A breach of confidentiality could be detrimental to a person financially and socially. When concerning epidemiology this risk is exponential dealing with entire communities. A community must have trust with the health care field, so that they know the most current recommendations do not have ulterior motives. Maintaining confidentiality is done in many ways. When using information for studies there are ways to have information presented within the study to protect individual’s confidentiality. Information within a study can be linked, which is to pair information about participants such as age, diagnosis, sex, geographic location, etc. Information can also be unlinked, which is that information is still present in the study, but not paired to an individual. It is also imperative to ensure you have consent for any activities. Consent is not merely getting a, “green light,” to proceed. Informed consent includes insuring all parties involved have information regarding what will be happening, shows understanding of that information, and then finally consent is given. By maintaining confidentiality and obtaining consent the public can build a trusting relationship with this area of …show more content…
It is the same for society and the field of epidemiology. By maintaining trust built with the public, studies can be conducted with little interference. Trust is often given to health care providers because the public knows the intentions of health care is to do no harm. This is one reason many people have come to trust health care providers. The epidemiologist also has to show respect for people and their rights. People have the right to their autonomy, as well as any protection for people with impaired or diminished autonomy. With this in mind, people in the field of epidemiology can be held to the standard of integrity, keeping them honest and held accountable. It is accountability that can ensure when details of an observation require medical treatment, the staff of the study will inform the participant so they can get the appropriate medical care. This level of respect between the public and epidemiology is essential.
In order to help the public and ensure they have the most current evidence based medical advice and knowledge of health events, the public and health care field must have a solid base relationship. This is achieved by epidemiologist by adhering to ethical standards without deviation. If the public doesn’t feel safe and respected, why would any community participate with studies or observations. It is because of society and communities that we can determine best health practices and provide
Patient Privacy and Consent Hinders Medical Advancements In the medical world, many disagreements revolve around the idea of patient privacy and consent. Some say it is an unethical act to not inform a patient on research that will be done on their cells. I say without informing the patient and avoiding possible risks of not being able to conduct life-saving research, many discoveries would be made. Consent for certain things would hinder advancements, and create a gap in medical development and progress that could possibly save someone’s life.
When one contemplates the credibility of the CDC, it is important to know who they are and where they come from. The CDC operates under the oversight of the HSS, as stated earlier. Guttman, Boccher-Lattimore, & Salmon (1998) found that the CDC, along with the Surgeon General, maintains a higher credibility rating than state-run and funded entities. It is also stated that, “Source credibility is a cornerstone of any successful information campaign” (Guttman et al., 1998, para. 4). When one accounts for these statements, the importance of credibility, as well as the credibility that the CDC has, one can view the CDC’s document as supporting the presence of ethos.
One of the most important concepts in the medical field nowadays is informed consent. Unfortunately, a few years ago this was not the case. The lack of importance given to informed consent can clearly be seen in the novel The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks by Rebecca Skloot. The novel that tells the story of an African American woman with cancer (Henrietta Lacks) who doctors and researchers took samples of cells (HeLa cells) in her body (without obtaining informed consent from her or her family) to conduct research studies. Chester Southam was a well- respected cancer researcher and chief of virology at Sloan- Kettering Institute for Cancer Research.
Theses steps are imperative to maintaining the patient’s privacy. When disclosing
In the study “Assessing the quality of informed consent in a resource-limited setting: A cross-sectional study,” researchers investigated the process of obtaining informed consent in clinical and public health research. The method of the study utilized interviews, in which research participants were asked a series of questions after they had been through informed consent procedures. 600 participants were interviewed, and the results show that 5.9% believed that they were not given enough information before deciding to participate. Only 5.7% of the participants said that they had not signed a consent form before making the decision to participate. Interestingly, 33.7% reported that they were not aware of their power to withdraw from participation
Informed Consent “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” details the injustice and hardships that an African American woman endured when skin color determined the value of a person/during a time dominated by racial segregation/when racial segregation was the law of the land. Born in Roanoke, Virginia, on August 1, 1920, Henrietta Lacks was forced to follow to racial segregation laws that prohibited Blacks from interacting with Whites in such public places as bathrooms, seating areas, colleges, and hospitals. Like all African Americans, she was treated as an inferior member of society due to her skin color. At the age of thirty, Mrs. Lacks had developed cervical cancer and went to Johns Hopkins Hospital, which only treated Blacks at the time.
Scientific research has undergone a transformation from knowing little about cells to experimenting on the cells and advance in medicine. The fascination to discover the unknown has triggered scientists to unconsciously over-step ethical boundaries. In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot (2010) elaborates on the legal unethical practices in 1951 in the United States and the standard medical practices during the Jim Crow era. The policies and regulations have structurally created disparities among the African American population leading to skepticism towards the healthcare system.
By telling patients too much information, informed consent can hurt patients more than protect them because of the mental block of fear and patient
By communicating effectively and sharing information, practitioners can ensure that the individual receives a coordinated and comprehensive care. Confidentiality is maintained by respecting the privacy of individuals, not sharing their personal information without their consent and ensuring that all records are kept securely. This is important to protect the rights of individuals and maintain
Methodology The author utilized excessive methodology throughout his book during the Tuskegee Experiment Study. Throughout the study, the helping professionals had many challenges and made changes when conducting this experiment. During this time, the helping professionals had no legal guidelines or stipulations until the last few years of the study. In the book, there were several methodologies that were utilized during the experiment.
This information is used to appropriately implement prevention and treatment for patients. The second outcome integrates analysis of information gathered by healthcare personnel to identify trends and inconsistencies within the healthcare population. Through this the origin of problems can be ascertained, and preventive measures can be instituted. Subsequently prevention will decrease incidences and ultimately the cost to
Population health is a field which includes health outcomes, patterns of health determinants and policies and interventions that link these two (Kindig & Stoddart, 2003). More recently, the National Academy of Medicine defined population health as an approach that treats the population as a whole (including the environmental and community contexts) as the patient (NACNEP, 2016). Allied health professionals relate to population health through the understanding of the increased demand to serve the population rather than only the individual. The three most critical areas to better serve the health of the population as allied health professionals include 1) viewing the population’s health as a whole, versus as individuals, 2) to emphasize the need to practice quality improvement and patient safety in all instances when a medical decision is made, and 3) take into consideration all sub-populations when judging the health of an entire population. To shift from individual patient care, based on active symptoms, is the current practice of most healthcare professionals.
If we as nurses respect the confidentiality of a patient, we should do so for all the patients. However, Griffith (2007) argues that the duty of confidence should not be absolute and nurses should always consider sharing information if required. Though the principle of respecting patient autonomy and their right to confidentiality is broken here, the principle of beneficence and non-maleficence is uphold. Nurses have an obligation to protect patient’s confidentiality but the duty to warn an innocent party of imminent harm is far more critical. Therefore, breaking confidentiality here is potentially doing more good than
Due to this it is important that when children and young people communicate with individuals such as practitioners it is important that they are make children and young people aware that confidentiality will take place. " Therefore, it is of great importance to have guidelines in place that clearly outline the service’s confidentiality commitment. " My Peer accessed on 01/02/18 however if needed to it will be shared with individuals that need to know. For example if a child or young person is at risk. If this does not happen it may lead to individuals not trusting practitioners and then issues will not be resolved.