As our final assignment for cornerstone we were tasked with revising our rhetorical analysis. I received a B, 81%, and by the end of my revisions have “A” quality work. During recent assignments and papers for other classes I realized the thesis was one of the first few sentences in the paper. As I was reading my paper I noticed that the purpose of the author writing this wasn 't until almost halfway into the first paragraph. My first revision was to put “The purpose of this article was for the author, Emily Heyer, to express her thoughts and opinions for gay marriage, and to share her views on why Iowa should have been pro gay marriage in 2011.” as the second sentence and make it flow. In the second paragraph it seems to me that I just summarized her work which wasn 't exactly part of the assignment. I went back and added the types of strategies she uses while writing her article and how they connect to the emotions of the reader and it affected the reader 's train of thought. I specified the pathos appeal throughout her article. I also reemphasize the purpose of the article and how she supported it. …show more content…
As I read on and on my rhetorical analysis continued to sound more and more like a summary. The way I changed that is by simply adding directing her writing to the thesis statement and her purpose. Towards the end of a major paragraph I added a sentence or two describing how it supported her purpose. I reread the article she wrote and realized her logical view on gay marriage really strayed away from her overall purpose. One of the reasons gay marriage wasn’t legalized in 2011 was because of their inability to procreate. She basically compared same sex couples and their inability to have children to people who are suffering from medical conditions and not being able to have
Although lacking examples and supports from Stewart’s writings, Essay 1B has a clear description of the prompt. This author was able to analyze the specific tone Stewart used and also provided adequate analysis of rhetorical strategies used by Stewart. The author’s sense of organization and appropriate analysis added to the author’s score. Essay 1C: The author of Essay 1C discusses the tone of Stewart’s writing but does not adequately respond to the given prompt.
This allows the audience to know that she can relate to the situation. Most everyone texts and it can be easy to allow such language to bleed over into any type of formal writing. She, however, believes that people have enough common sense and control and that most people don't allow themselves to use such language in their final drafts of their formal writings. Despite establishing her credibility and strong use of logos, she does, however, lack in pathos. She fails at truly connecting with the reader on a more personal and emotional level.
Good evening, David, James, and Abdullah and the rest of you here, how are you? I am here tonight to announce my candidacy for the presidency and I would start off by expressing my gratitude for your support because let's face it, I wouldn’t be here without you and to be honest, I wasn't even going to run for the presidency but I live by a certain creed, one that runs in my blood and this being that you should never accept the world as it appears to be, always dare to see it for what it could be. But is natural for us to accept the illusions of hope. We opt to shut our eyes from the painful truth.
This paper was probably one of the hardest paper I had to write just because I felt like I was on my own. I was scared at first but i felt like this helped me learn how to properly look and analyze a speech or a writing in general. One way this helped was I highlighted what I thought was a rhetorical device and I had to properly analyze it and see what he/ she is trying to accomplish through his or her writing.
She uses different rhetorical techniques effectively. Usually, most authors who uses rhetorical techniques use them in persuasive writing, but Schulman’s story was not a persuasive essay. Schulman uses rhetorical techniques effectively without being biased since she shares both the negative and positive arguments, does not include a personal perception, and the vocabulary she uses is professional and unattached to her personal feelings towards the subject. Schulman creates professional and logical claims in her writing. Through she was not biased to either side, there was a lot of negative statements that outweighed the positive.
Rhetorical Analysis I alter use in the body paragraphs in order to show how Andy ( a lower class character) is an example of “heredity” since he takes over his late father’s position at the coal mine. In other words, the way I use quotes in my Rhetorical Analysis demonstrate that I have learned to take in consideration all parts of the quotes. Even though I have improved in considering all parts of the quote when using them as supporting evidence, I actually got to notice that I make arguments that are more than what I can possibly support with evidence from the text. This issue was pointed out to me in the comments left in turnitin.com by Dr. Danner. This problem in my writing was pointed out in my Rhetorical Analysis when I wrote, “under
In multiple news outlets today, one can find a plethora of rhetorical devices in a single segment. In each instance, the anchor, reporter, or tv personality is attempting to sway viewers’ opinions in subtle and unsubtle ways. Rhetorical devices are used for almost any topic, especially politics. The following examples were found in the MSNBC article over the price increase of the EpiPen written by Steve Benen on August 25, 2016, and a transcript of the Bresch Interview given with the essay prompt. The four rhetorical devices were a dysphemism, a rhetorical analogy, repetition, and a rhetorical explanation.
As a reader one has to know what to look for and identify the main idea and understand what the author is trying to argue. Before taking Writing 10 I felt I was a good reader and able to identify the main idea in a prompt, but little did I really know. After going through the research process and trying to identify reliable sources I have essentially cut out the unnecessary information and I go straight to the idea or argument being made by the author. As of before, I would focus on every detail of the writing. Having been assigned readings and having discussions about the readings during class, I soon realized that writing is about an argument being made with supporting evidence.
I was assigned the rhetorical appeal, logos. Logos is based off of reasoning, facts, using statisics and logic to persuade the reader. For my example I found an anti-smoking adverstiment. The advermisensts goal is to persuade viewers to not start smoking. I believe this is an example of logos because the adversiments lists facts that smoking will kill you.
She knows that many people reading and critiquing her article would look down on her and push her ideas to the side if she was emotional and irrational in her thinking, so she keeps her article rather “dry” in order to let the reader not only create the emotions around the situations of valedictorian on their own, but decide which emotions they associate with each situation. If they want to be happy for the person who won a lawsuit, they could, if they wanted to be angry at the person who started a lawsuit, they could, if they wanted to agree or disagree with the principal who stopped naming a valedictorian, they could. In doing this kind of a “dry” writing that leads the reader to their own emotions, her argument can be seen as rational for not being based heavily in pathos, as many people expect women to
Rebecca Skloot uses rhetorical devices throughout the book such as; logos, ethos, and pathos to appeal to the audience and help spread public awareness of this
Rhetorical Situation 1 When I first asked my parents for a phone, they said no, so I had to convice them why I needed one and what the benefit would be. I ended up convincing them to get me a phone, but I still had restrictions on what I could and couldn't do. This rhetorical situation appealed a lot to ethos because I was expalining to my parents why they should trust me with a phone. Exigence: I was motivated to convince them to get me a phone so that I could talk to my friends, play games on it, and to be able to use social media. Almost all of my friends had one, so I kind of felt left out by not having one and that motivated me to ask my parents for one.
In the essay #1 “What Makes Families Happy or Unhappy in America”, I’ve learnt something about how to write my first English essay with templates and formulas, such as “PIE”, which stands for point, information and explanation. What I worked in Essay #1 is that regarding to notes and handout materials of reading and class notes, to write a good essay, students should have ideas on writing introduction as the first paragraph that hooks audience and provides a brief description of the essay. Summary template and the model of “They Say/I Say” are to help students accomplish persuasive papers, argumentative research papers and thesis statement. The thesis statement that is the last sentence of introduction answers in a cohesive and critical way the essay question: what makes families happy or unhappy in America?
The writer's ability to write with clarity was continuous and evident throughout the essay. The writer effectively backed up their thesis in all three body paragraphs; the
If the author provides examples of what someone said long ago, the readers captivated with his examples because things and people were different back then. His ending idas are not clear for the readers to his final statement and their final take on the article with construing examples and surprising thesis statement all the at the end of the article. He talks about how technologies overflow an individual 's perception of reality and then he puts his main idea the end saying no one can achieve personal authenticity (5). It seemed unclear and sloppy because the reader might not get nothing from the article. It would have made more sense if u had the thesis at the beginning but not end to prove his