In the 15th and 16th centuries, absolute monarchs in western and eastern Europe were qualified by being the sole rulers of their state, expansionism, inspiring loyalty, and centralization of political, economic, and social powers. Perhaps the greatest example of an absolute monarch, Louis XIV of France, summarized absolut views “I am the state.” Louis, also known as Sun King, made efforts to have France completely revolve around himself. Monarchs greedy strive towards power, left Europe in desperate need in political, and most importantly social reform, making way for philosophes and later enlightened despotism to improve quality of life. Philosophes were thinkers of the 18th century who concentrated on expressing social problems, causing …show more content…
Two or Three examples of varying philosophe views. Monarchs became invested in these ideas through contact with philosophes, and became one part enlightened and other part tyrannical, autocratic despots. But just how enlightened varied per ruler. So called “enlightened despots”, such as Frederick the Great and Catherine the Great, only undertook these enlightened notions when it benefited their own power. Joseph II was a monarch, but not a despot because he ruled in an enlightened way, without absolute qualities. Frederick II, commonly known as Frederick the Great, was king of Prussia from 1740 to 1786. Frederick's father, Fredrick Williams I cultivated a forceful Prussian army and a militarized nation. Frederick the Great used this military against Maria Theresa’s Habsburg Empire and took control of Silesia, breaking the Pragmatic Sanctions. Frederick ruled in ways that are reminiscent of Peter the Great, an absolute ruler of …show more content…
As for how she achieved this, Catherine had to be a tyrannical despot just to come to power. She married Peter III of Russia and then had one of her many lovers kill him so she could become the autocratic ruler. Similarly to Peter the Great, Catherine encouraged art and philosophe by way of patronizing and was celebrated by philosophese for restricting torture and making efforts to create an enlightened law code, where Peter the Great, generations before, had only westernized Russia to centralize his own power. Furthermore, Catherine succeeded where other rulers had failed in modernization of Russia, proving her enlighteness. A woman who rules with such power cannot encourage radical thinking unconditionally, because adventually it will threaten her own power as it came to be during Pugachev’s Rebellion. During Catherine the Great’s reign serfdom took place in much of Europe, where former peasants had lost rights to landlords by way of absolute monarchs attempts to keep nobles on their side. Serfs were exasperated with their restrictions and began the rebellion. Another key idea to keep in mind is that the Russian economy relied on serfdom, and if it faltered, it could have destroyed social, economic, and political structure. To protect her state, consequently, Catherine ended her enlightened reign, and became more oppressive by
King Louis XIV of France recommended absolute rule because he believed that the less people there are to exploit it. (Document 3) I agree with him and I believe it is one of the reasons for the prosperity of absolutism. When one person controls an entire country,
Peter the Great did a lot to help Russia become a great power. It took him his whole 40 years to do this for Russia. The main goal for Peter in order to make Russia a great power was to westernize it. He thought if you modernize the country then the country would be strong. Peter wanted to have a capital near the water so the navy would be strong and it would be easier for trade.
As an absolute monarch, Catherine the Great changed Russia in many positive ways; multiple historians even consider her to be one of the most enlightened rulers of her time. Catherine was the longest reigning female monarch of Russia and accomplished many things during her 34 years in the crown. She dreamed of establishing a reign of order and justice, of spreading education and of developing a national culture. By writing several books, pamphlets and educational materials, she improved Russia’s schooling system. Looking to improve the education of her people, Catherine studied the systems created by other countries.
The Sun King: Ideal or Flawed There has never been a perfect monarch, but there are great ones that existed. Such as, Suleiman I from the Ottoman empire, or Cyrus II from the Persian empire. Louis XIV has definitely surpassed them and became one of the best monarchs in the world. Born on September 5, 1638 Louis XIV took heir when he was twenty-three. His nickname, the Sun King, was brought by himself.
Absolute monarchs centralize their absolute power. Louis XIV and Peter the Great are exceptional examples of an absolute monarch. Louis ruled in France from 1638 – 1715 and Peter ruled in Russia, but he was not liked by many people. They both had all four characteristics of an absolute monarch. Louis centralized his power by keeping nobles busy with court life, he increased revenue by supporting the arts and literature and reformed taxation with the help of Jean Baptiste Colbert.
Peter the Great accomplished a lot during his reign, yet there were incidents where he used terror to get his way with the empire. As for Catherine, she let her personal relationships impact her political decisions. “She had sent troops to help the Polish king Stanislas (a former lover) in suppressing a nationalist revolt aimed at reducing Russia's influence in Poland.” Conspiring with her lovers on official empress business, makes Catherine appear to be an unqualified ruler by letting her opinions be altered by her intimate relationships. Having secrets behind their actual official ruling leads both Catherine and Peters reputation came off as bad regardless of how they were as rulers.
Enlightened absolute monarch is a ruler who was inspired or influenced by the enlightenment era. An example of a ruler who would be in an absolute monarch is a King or Queen that rules an empire. Specifically they would be influenced by several famous philosophers. These would include: John Locke and Voltaire. They would be influenced by their way of thinking and their philosophies.
The role that King Louis XIV plays in Tartuffe, although not a character himself, affects the whole outcome of the play. King Louis XIV was an absolute monarch and was responsible for restoring order in society. The age of reason, 1660-1805, was a time to restore order while finding humor in those who stray away from order. King Louis was responsible for ensuring the safety and order of the country, and we come to learn that his power spreads much further than suspected. By divine right and being an offstage presence, King Louis XIV has the ability to control and assist everyone, whether it is warranted or not.
During the 1600s and 1700s a new type of monarch emerged known as an absolute ruler. Some of these rulers were Louis XIV, the Fredericks of Prussia, and Peter the Great. These rulers believed that a monarch had a divine right to rule and should only listen to God. All these rulers had characteristics that defined them as absolutists. Louis XIV was constantly at war during his reign which resulted in a powerful army.
Peter the Great and Louis XIV were both the greatest rulers of their times. Both of them were autocrats having unlimited power and on the contrary both of them were absolutists. Louis XIV was the ruler of France and nicknamed “The Sun King” and Peter the Great was the ruler of Russia. Although Peter the Great and Louis XIV has some different successes, they had several noticeable similarities such as power, buildings, and armies/economical growths. Peter the Great and Louis XIV had similar successes in their famous buildings.
Post Thirty Years war left France looking for a new leadership style that would give plenty of stability. What France received was Louis XIV, who would reign under the new absolute monarchy government. During Louis’ reign, divine rights controlled rank in society. This left many confused on why they were picked to be at the bottom of society, and why the king was given his power. Jean Domat, a royally appointed juror by king Louis helped explain a better understanding of the new system of governance to the people of France in his writings.
Background Information on the Enlightenment: In the year of 1791, The French and Haitian Revolution coexisted simultaneously. France was trying to pick up the pieces of a country left in shambles, while across the hemisphere, Haiti was about to ignite the fire. In France, they were in the process of creating a new government, in which all citizens would have equal rights, as based on the Declaration of the Rights of Man. In Haiti, a shocked oppressed populace was discovering the power that was held by the Declaration of the Rights of Man and was keen to set their own revolution.
Absolute monarchies had all the power in Europe. Their kingdoms were powerful and accomplished. Although absolute monarchies empowered and enriched their kingdoms, they were still largely detrimental because of King Louis XIV of France, debt, Frederick the Great’s seizure of Silesia, and the city of St. Petersburg. King Louis XIV of France was an absolute monarch.
Much like Peter she was bent on establishing naval bases for the Russian navy and was able to once again secure ports as Russia annexed Crimea and land along the Black Sea from the Ottoman Empire. An excellent example of this was Catherine the Great as she sought to emulate the West, by releasing statements in support of Western ideals of human rights. But in reality she also expanded serfdom and violently crushed peasant revolutions. This shows, that although Catherine may have wanted to emulate western culture, she also wanted to maintain her power and would crush these uprisings at the cost of these values.
Such as Frederick William I of Prussia, otherwise known as “The Soldier King”. He increased his army, and land which therefore increased his power over the country. By increasing his army he made his country feel safe, and instilled fear in his people. This caused for his power over the people to increase therefore allowing him to become an absolute monarch. Louis the XIV also increased his military powers, which increased his total power.