The central 18th century Russian ruler, Catherine II, also known as Catherine the Great, has retained a place in the pages of history as one of the brightest and most influential women of not only her time, but of more recent history altogether. Catherine the Great ’s accomplishments had effectively transformed Russia and led to its so-called golden age, touching upon nearly every aspect of Russian society. This resulted in praise and admiration from many central figures of the time, including renowned philosophe Voltaire, who had once described her as the “first of all women, who is putting so many men to shame,” (Dixon 196).
Liberalism Liberalism generated in Europe in the 17th century and generally focused on the protection of property and individual rights. Opello (2004) describes this concept as an instance of the “universal law of reason” (p. 94). The absolute power of a state should, therefore, be limited with the help of ‘popular sovereignty’, which involved the public in state decision and its own protection. Also the ‘general will’ of the population led to a focus on freedom, especially in communication, seen in the new expressions of public opinion in the media. This new emergence of sovereignty subsequently emerged new individual rights, which focused on private property rights and the protection from inefficient absolute rule (Opello, 2004).
Both Catherine the Great and Peter the Great sought to enhance and further Russia’s international position. This I believe is most consistent with classical realism as they both sought to place their country in a more powerful position, through the expansion of both their state abroad and within their nation-state. These readers without a doubt westernized Russia, but were limited by the constraints of the Russian culture and power structure. The first issue I would tackles is the attempt of Peter the Great to establish Russia as a formidable regional power by taking the traditional metrics of power such as a more centralized government and modernizing the Russian military.
Absolutism 's nature of putting complete control of a nation into one person has not always been successful, however there are ways in which it does succeed in being an effective way of ruling. As Machiavelli 's "The Prince" stated: People always will have a motive of bettering themselves, and they will attempt to do so through duplicity and great avarice. Their loyalty and compliance to a leader is assured as long as the one they follow has an allure, so granting trust and power can lead to their betrayal and could cause the fall of the monarch’s reign. If all power rests with a single individual, there will be a far less chance that a struggle within a nation 's very own government will occur. Absolutism in this respect does well, as it
Closeness and unusualness Both Peter and Great and Charles I was the most huge inspiration driving the movement of organization. Lessening and Great, who was a level out a ruler, had an aggregate vitality to the country. Regardless, Charles I, who was a blessed ruler, had no noteworthiness to the country in light of the way that a constitution obliged the powers of government. Therefore, I think Peter the Great had more power than Charles I had. The total govern could pass laws without a parliament.
Peter l took the Russian throne in 1682 at the age of 10. However he didn’t take control of the government until 1689 at the age of 17. The country was poor and in ruins because it was going through the “ Times of Troubles”. This was a terrible period for Russia because it was a time that consisted of disorder and foreign invasions. The country had a weak military, bad education, a weak economy, and Russia was not progressing as much as it’s opposing countries.
Russian tsars are authoritative Christian monarchs which started in 1721 from one of the first emperors named Peter I the Great. This empire lasted until 1917 when Nicholas had to abdicate his throne due to many reasons and considered a backward country. There is also a speculation about two family members surviving the firing squad. The Russian tsars established in 1672 and Peter I the great was Russia’s first emperor.
Throughout “The Bronze Horseman”, Pushkin used symbolism. The river Neva, Peter the Great, his statue, and even Evgeny are all hold another meaning. The use of symbolism in ”The Bronze Horseman” was vital to the poem. Without symbolism, the poem is simply about a man losing his mind in St. Petersburg.
Peter the Great (1682-1725) The ruler of Russia, Peter the Great, is a best fit absolute monarch for the entirety of Europe. First off, the characteristics of absolutism are centralizing the government, pacifying the nobility, increasing the revenue, and establishing an army. All these characteristics were successfully accomplished by Peter the Great that made his empire in Russia stand for a long period of time.
In the 1400s, the Mongols were largely coming out of Mongol rule. There were both advantages and disadvantages to Mongol influence. One of the advantages was the establishment of a tribute government, not a full government. This allowed for a system which was more efficient and put more power into the hands of the ruler. Another advantage was the adoption of Mongol dress and social habits.
Reforms can be beneficial or detrimental an emerging empire. During his reign, Peter the Great implemented many reforms that expedited the Europeanization of Europe. Many of these reforms were viewed as negative by society and many were against them. However, most of them did what was intended to help modernize Russia. With his newfound knowledge of city-building, he built the city of St. Petersburg, which Shaw 6 became the new capitol of Russia.
Peter the Great also did some things that were not so great like his ruthless torturing methods, he taxed people until they were nearly broke, he changed many Russian customs to more western european customs, and he mainly helped the wealthy people and not the lower class. Peter the Great showed himself as a monarch and did many good and bad things for Russia (Russia land of the Tsars). Louis XIV was the ruler of France and he also served as an autocrat with absolute power. Louis XIV was a strong ruler who always used a routine for the better. Louis XIV was known as the “sun King, the source of light for all his people” (Spielvogel one).