Question 02 A unit excise tax on tobacco products makes economic sense, since it will not only increase government revenue but will also improve the health of South Africans 2.1 Introduction The use of tobacco products pose a danger to the humans’ life. Moreover, for the past 2,5 decades the use of tobacco has been increasing particularly among young males (Ohsfeldt et al 1998). As a result, various policies to control tobacco use, including unit excise tax regulation were introduced. Given, the demand and price theory it makes economic sense to impose tax on tobacco product to discourage consumption. This will benefit the government since taxes are a source of government revenue. In this essay, am going to analyse the unit excise tax, …show more content…
Ability-to-pay principle is related to horizontal equity and vertical equity. Horizontal equity states that individuals with the same economic capacity pay the same amount of tax. While the latter, postulates that individuals with greater economic capacity pay more. Horizontal equity treat people of same economic capacity in a similar, while vertical equity requires that people with differing economic capacity be treated differently. (Hyman …show more content…
Although taxes are important for government function, they also distort relative prices and create inefficiency in the market. A unit excise tax on cigarette which fall under the category of selective tax is one of the tax which is levied as a source of revenue for the government and also to discourage consumption of the cigarette. Moreover, it is argued in this essay that the excise tax levied on buyers does not affect only the buyer but also the seller's because of possibility of tax shifting. That is, who actually bears the tax burden (this refers to tax incidence) does not depend on who the tax is levied on, but it depends on the elasticity of demand and
Sales tax is income elastic; because of this fact, consumers have a higher tax incidence and carry the burden. From this, it has been evidenced that the tax burden is vertically unequitable and can be seen as unfair to the less fortunate. Sales tax is paid by retailers, which is dependent upon their sales revenue. However, since the demand of consumers is inelastic and can vary based on market and economic conditions, this burden is felt more by lower income individuals and families. However, it is important to note that the tax burden is independent of who physically pays the tax.
Taxes had forced some colonists to avoid or reduce consumption of taxed
Firstly, the Synar Amendment is a representative example of the federal anti-tobacco regulations, on which I focus in the proposal essay. Such amendment is an efficient method of the authorities in the attempt to restrict the use of tobacco, with the juvenile being the aspects in particular. Secondly, the term is a typical concept in America, which is unfamiliar to many countries in the world. Because of this, there are plenty of rooms for discussing the difference between the implementation and enforcement of tobacco control laws of the United States and those of other countries in my research paper. To sum up, I firmly believe the concept of “The Synar Amendment” will develop my argument
The upper class can buy and have what they want not the lower class. The lower class has to either walk to work, work more than two jobs to support their families, and maintain good health while the middle and upper class has their “basic needs” handed to them, pretty much. If I had to choose between one of the theories between principle of equal liberty and difference principle, it would be principle of equal liberty. It would be principle of equal liberty because everyone should be treated equally even if they are more poorer than others.
This act might also be proven as effective because it is very similar to the cigarette tax, which showed that “the trends in cigarette prices and overall U.S. cigarette consumption from 1970 to 2015 show that there is a strong correlation between increasing prices and decreasing consumption” (TobbacoFreeKids.org). This clearly indicates that the market is willing to let go of particular items if there is an increase in prices. Statistics showed that after the tax on cigarettes, “that a $1-per-pack increase, which is similar to what the President has proposed, would result by 2021 in 8 percent fewer smokers aged 18-24, compared to current law” (Marr). Even a product like cigarettes, which is highly addictive, people were able to say no when there was a shift in costs. The SWEET Act is feasible because it has an overwhelming support group behind it, these groups include “American Heart Association, American Public Health Association, California Center for Public Health Advocacy, California Pan-Ethnic Health Network, ChangeLab Solutions, Consumer
Income inequality is a global issue that need to be addressed and is a threat to the individuals or household with low income. In today’s world the rich are becoming rich while the poor are deteriorating and going below the poverty line. To me, imposing high income taxes would not bring an immediate solution only that, it accelerates the burden. Because the higher the tax rate, the higher the rate of poverty subjected to the low income individuals. Due to that, the government should provide quality education to the citizens so that they become self-reliant in the future and experience high living standards.
During 1700’s the European demand for tobacco increased. When tobacco became higher in demand it cause the demand for
1. Introduction Income inequality has grown significantly during this past decades and this phenomenon continues to increase over the years. This problem is constantly discussed in the daily news all around the world. Several consequences of this increase of inequality between people leads to economic problems such as high unemployment rates, lack of work for young people, fall of demand for certain product. The gap between rich and poor is increasing, the rich are richer and the poor are poorer as a result politicians and economists try to adopt certain policies in order to reduce this gap.
Distribution is one the most controversial matter in Political Philosophy as far as Social Justice is concerned. In this essay, I will discuss about the capability approach as the plausible factor to consider when devising a distribution scheme. The capability approach takes a comprehensive or holistic approach which considers the abilities, functionings, opportunities, the being of an individual and other factors as well. The capability approach is a theoretical framework that involves two central normative claims that the freedom to attain well-being is of fundamental moral importance; and it needs to be understood in terms of people's capabilities, that is, their actual opportunities to do and be what they value and have reason to sustain
A difficulty, however, is monitoring how much it actually is.. If it is unclear how much negative externality is imposed on society it is difficult to say how high the taxes should be. Another problem, which could occur is that the black market could benefit from the high taxes on alcohol. Since such goods are not controlled by the government. The inferior alcohol, which is sold on the black market, can cause severe health issues.
This essay will identify and discuss Stuart White’s 6 conditions for the structuring of fair social intuitions in light of the basic income debate. Stuart White generated a 6-part theory for the structuring of fair social institutions, that builds upon Rawls (1921-2002) theory on justice as fairness (White, 2012 p.129). White’s theory is based on the notion of fair reciprocity; this is defined as an obligation that individuals who possess a higher than average share of social benefits correspondingly owe the individuals who possess less, a contribution of their benefits (White, 2003 p.91). White discusses the rights and obligations that individuals should possess in his theory of justice as fair reciprocity.
“Fairness under a proportional or flat tax emphasizes equality: Everyone tax should be subject to the same tax rules, and therefore, everyone should pay the same tax rate and bear the same relative tax burden.” Any of the working classes will bear some type of burden, but this type of taxation ensures that every citizen is taxed fairly and equally.
Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,
1.1 Background Indonesia is one of the developing countries that have high levels of consumption and production of cigarette. Variation product and price cigarettes cause Indonesia has become one of the producers and consumers cigarette the largest in the world (Anies, 2006). According to the Director of the Directorate General of Customs and Excise, Frans Rupang, permitting the establishment of a cigarette production is relatively easy. Now we have at least 3,800 cigarette factories, including home-based classes. The amount was the largest in the world (http://bisniskeuangan.kompas.com accessed 25 April 2015).
In Kenya, it is estimated that one of every five teenagers smoke. It has also been established that that most people start smoking at the age between 12 and 14, in addition to the fact that 1,200 tobacco smokers die every from smoking (Eaton, 2003). This translates to about 1,4389,00 deaths every year. This is a great number of preventable deaths every year. Despite being of great economic importance, tobacco has brought about much more harm than good.