Title: Could the CRISPR Gene Editing Tool result in Designer Babies?
Gene editing is a method which allows making very precise changes to the DNA in a cell. The introduction will contain an insight in the revolutionary new-found technology CRISPR with its potential to change humanity forever in a way that it captures the interest of the reader.
2. Gene editing modifies characteristics of humans
In this paragraph, I will write about the two types of gene editing, how they work and how they differ from one other.
1. Germline genetic modification is a form of manipulation used to change genes in eggs, sperm or early-staged embryos. These modifications would appear in every cell of the resulting baby but also in future generations. …show more content…
In this paragraph, I will touch on where the limitations of CRISPR should be drawn from both a scientific and also ethical view. Maybe this isn’t even achievable to control? Also, I have only mentioned how CRISPR can be used, but have yet to mention possible consequences and dangers. Modified humans could alter the genome of our entire species, because their engineered traits will be passed on to their children and could spread over generations slowly modifying the whole gene pool of humanity. This of course will start slowly and the first designer babies will not be overly “designed”, they will most likely be created to eliminate a deadly genetic disease running in their family. Where will the modification stop? If one makes their offspring immune to Alzheimer, why not also add perfect eyesight or the gift of extraordinary intelligence? Could it possibly even stop …show more content…
CRISPR is at the beginning stage and has yet to be fully explored and understood in its entirety. The simplicity and efficiency of the editing tool gives rise to an array of possible appliances. There is no denying that gene editing technologies are becoming an important part of human society and will have a significant impact on the human genome. For now, the main focus of CRISPR is to improve the human health by finding solutions to fighting genetically inherited diseases and cures against cancer and HIV. It is safe to assume that CRISPR will be used to gather further knowledge about the genome and study targeted areas of DNA. Another central aspect that needs additional research is the connection between genetic variations (genotype) and their effect on the human phenotype. Understanding this is crucial in order to alter features of the human body. Ultimately, CRISPR is still a long way from being utilised as tool to redesign the human phenotype, let alone meddle in even more complicated matters such as intelligence. In addition, the overall ethical and legal point of view is an aspect that cannot be
Click here to unlock this and over one million essaysShow More
CRISPR makes it easy to “turn off” a specific gene at a time to see what it does, and it can introduce mutations to treat cancer or find out if people are predisposed to things such as obesity and diabetes. Michael Page uses rhetorical devices such as ethos, logos and pathos to elucidate the pros and cons of genetically
In the third chapter of Ronald M. Green’s Babies by Design Green suggest the idea of categorizing the different degrees of human gene modification into the style of Punnett squares. Additionally, this chapter mainly focuses on the boundaries and of genetic engineering from Somatic modification treatment to germline enhancement. Green breaks this chapter up, in essentially four sections. He acknowledges the benefits of all four types of genetic modification and while some are less controversial than others, he presents a more in-depth argument for ones that are hotly debated, like germline gene therapy.
Ignoring the development of genetic modification can cause a total chaos when so many good things can come from this process. Cloning and genetic enhancing research needs to be further expanded and brought to the
Marilyn Monroe once said “Imperfection is beauty, madness is genius, and it is better to be absolutely ridiculous than absolutely boring”. Perfection is highly impossible to achieve and is even questionably considered to be a concept. With technology advancing, there has come a time when pure nature can be directly affected by the technology we have. Should we have the ability to change the imperfections of our children, or inevitably prevent imperfections from happening? This is the question behind the future genetic engineering.
The much-awaited day is almost here, dreaded by some, and anticipated by others. Potential parents may soon have the choice to tailor-make their own designer baby, that is, one whose genetic make-up has been selected in order to eradicate a particular defect, or to ensure that a particular gene is present (Designer). How appealing to design their newborn to be disease-free, brown, blue, or green eyed, blonde or brunette, female or male, athletic, musical, and intelligent! But in the bigger scheme of things, is it a good idea?
Finally, genetic modifying can allow people to live longer. You may think that this is good that people would live longer, but there some negative aspects to this. Life would be very boring of course, but more importantly, overpopulation would happen and humans would be in competition with one another since everything would now be limited. While some aspects of genetic engineering should appealing, they all most likely have a dark secret hiding within
The advancements in technology will only continue to increase allowing a vast variety of options in eugenics. Although religious communities will always debate over the ethics and beliefs with the science of gene therapy—these communities should consider the enhancements of the quality of lives that can be changed with
I want you all to imagine a world with no diseases and maybe even no cancer. Seems pretty impossible right? Well, with gene therapy that could all change. B. Background and Audience Relevance: Gene therapy is essentially using genes as drugs for the treatment of human disease. In the future, this experimental technique may allow doctors to treat a disorder by inserting a gene into a patient’s cells instead of using medicine or surgery.
Implications concerning are of long-term, religion, economic, and ethical. Long-term effects are “improving” the human bloodline. Mutated genes or “superpowers” can be passed down to newer generations. Social implications like religion is always a factor. Some religions believe that mutations are a “violation of god’s laws” and that doctors are playing god.
Occasionally, there is a mutation in this DNA sequence which results in disease. The use of CRISPR will positively impact society by allowing the elimination and cure of DNA mutation diseases, which outweighs the social opposition of the permanent alteration of the human genome. CRISPR- Cas9 is a genome editing tool. The human genome consists of 23 chromosomes that
The issue of modification through gene manipulation becomes increasingly complex when considering how this technology can be used as a means to unethical and harmful uses. In the article, Babies with Genes From 3 people could be Ethical, Panel Says, Rob Stein exposes various concerns about three gene donors in an embryo, including how a scientist, “Could introduce some new disease into the human gene pool or that scientists could try to do this for other reasons-nonmedical reasons, like create designer babies where parents pick the traits of their children.” Stein goes on to explain how the gene replacement procedure would take place, which continues to usher in a plethora of concerns as whether to allow Crispr technology be tested on a embryo.
This procedure’s purpose is to switch out genes for more preferred ones, especially to improve the health of the child. Genetic engineering could permit selection of desired physical and pleasurable traits for non-medical reasons, which has created concern in some people. The process of switching out the genes of a fetus to install genes that are more preferred has brought up debate about whether or not parents should be able to alter their babies genes to make them more appealing to the parents interests. There are many different ways of looking at this procedure and in contrast to other scientific procedures it can be for greater good or for unnecessary enhancement that could potentially create problems in society. Designer babies aren’t morally correct or incorrect, but are in between depending on what it is being used for.
Editing of the human genome in the past has been only a sight seen in dystopia works such as Brave New World. Now, genetic enhancement is a prevalent today and people are beginning to realize the issues that can arise from creating these designer babies. Gene editing can be helpful to eradicate life changing disabilities. Yet, the term disability does not correctly label these differently abled people, as the idea of what is considered disabled has changed overtime. To fully understand the consequences and implications of genetic selection and enhancement of human embryos, society must mature and declare lines of what is and is not ethically moral.
The procedure putting another extra clone gene to the mom’s womb and growing is not easy and sometimes it can cause moms and the child 's death. Because we want a clone baby doesn’t mean we want to kill the moms so it is irrelevant and hazardous. Peoples want to believe that we shouldn 't be afraid of cloning babies or having engineered baby, but however people connected to their religion and didn’t want to mess with their god(religion) so because of that most of the people didn’t want to accept this technology. As seen in the (Caplan’s) article, scientists are using CRISPR CAS9 to make a new engineered baby. This tool helps to edit genes in animals and insects and now it also works on human to modify their genes and to enter the new gene to make clone babies.the intriguing instance of genetic modification was that there is a lot of controversies and agreements in human cloning.