First, The Second Amendment protects your rights. The amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." This amendment states your undeniable right to have a gun. So, if stricter Gun control law were to be enforced, not only does it go against the constitution, but it also obstructs your ability to protect yourself. In District of Columbia et al.
"Those people were already allowed to have guns on university grounds. they just couldn 't bring them into classroom, dorms and other insides spaces, some of which may remain off limits." Such a situation cannot remove people’s anxiety from the gun even though there is the rule of the gun. Campuses should be enforce sanctions for having guns because they are emotionally threatened and will be a criminal oriented environment. The existence of guns will be a major threat to some of the students.
This is a persuasive essay on the subject of gun control and whether citizens should be able to carry guns in public. It is discussed that guns should be permitted because previous incidents where people did not have protection against other members of society led to numerous fatalities. Guns would benefit society on the basis of self defense. It is also discussed of the ways to help regulate gun control such as background checks and other actions that could be taken. The cost of gun violence is soaring and a way to monitor that is to adapt better gun laws for citizens Law enforcement is there to protect us but sometimes things need to be handled instantly and having to wait on them can present a bigger problem.
There just might be an opportunity to solve the problem of mass murders caused by disturbed individuals with guns. If we can get the politicians to stop talking long enough to listen. They may realize they are both wrong on the issue of gun control. Note how carefully I chose my words there. Guns do not kill people.
As an example, someone walks into someones house and tries to kill that person, if there are stricter gun laws then you might not be able to shoot back at them. Also guns should not have stricter laws because they are used for hunting. There are thousands of hunters across the United States that would be very upset if they had their guns taken away. Although some hunters could use a bow to hunt with,there are just a few people that would really prefer using the gun that got taken away from them. Lastly,guns are not the problem and should not be restricted but the people using them should be restricted from using them.
The second amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” Recently, the controversy of guns and gun control has been a huge topic of discussion. In the past few months, there have been multiple shootings, including two popular mass shootings such as the one in Las Vegas and the one at the high school in Florida. Some are saying that all guns should be banned and no one should have guns, and that will result in less homicides and mass shootings. On the other hand, some say that there should not be gun control because of the second amendment, self defense and safety, and how it will not change the amount of violence in the country. The topic has been quite tense as there have been a number protests and debates going around in the countries communities.
The fact that gun control is still not tightened is a huge margin and error, and still causes mass shootings as we just covered. Many people have said that we should not allow guns to be purchased, which would seem like the logical option. However, according to the same source, Council on Foreign Relationship, some states, such as Idaho, Alaska, and Kansas, have passed various laws attempting to nullify
Personally I believe that some of the laws we have asked for will not help any of our problems, but instead make many legal gun owners become criminals simply because of the weapons they choose for defense, hunting, or sports shooting. The people who wish to see more laws do have some sound logical requests. Due to the blanket type laws that are proposed, many of these views are altered because people have not thought of the aftermath of passing such laws. One item that has been proposed on many levels of state and federal government is to ban assault type weapons. Many Americans that believe we should do this, have a faded vision of what an assault weapon actually is.
Gun control means control, it means control for the government and government start controlling the people, Gun control is a board term that covers any sort of restriction on what kinds of firearms can be sold and bought, who can posses or sell them, where and how they can be stored or carried. Gun should be allowed anywhere,citizens need guns for self defense, the Second Amendment provides the United States people the rights to bear arms despite the fact more guns equal more crime. In my opinion Gun control is not a problem, but to other people guns is an issues. To some people gun control is a crime issue, it is a right issue. In my opinion Gun control is a safety issue, an education issue, a racial issue, and a political issue among others.
“You can have all the gun control laws in the country, but if you do not enforce them, people are going to find a way to protect themselves. We need to recognize that bad people are doing bad things with these weapons. It 's not the law-abiding citizens. It 's not the person who uses it as a hobby” (Steele). Gun control laws are made to keep people safe, but that does not necessarily mean that they are one-hundred percent effective.