Various casinos have now changed course by supporting legalized Internet poker, albeit as long as they can monopolize the industry. The industry initially tried to crush their competition, but the market grew in size despite high profile prosecutions. Accordingly, it should be no surprise that Sen. Harry Reid (D-NV), a long time darling of the casino industry, changed his opinion on the issue in line with casino industry. “Rent-A-Senator” Reid had opposed Internet poker in the past but switched course in 2010. For instance, he tried unsuccessfully to add a bill legalizing online poker to an extension of the Bush era tax cuts. With that in mind, Reid’s bill would have created a vast competitive advantage for major Nevada and New Jersey casinos, …show more content…
Shelley Berkley (D-NV) also changed her stance on Internet poker. Berkley had proposed an amendment to Jim Leach’s bill that would have eliminated all the exemptions for Internet gambling. In other words, she tried to implement a complete ban on Internet gambling, thereby providing a strong competitive advantage to Nevada casinos. However, Berkley’s stance had changed drastically by 2012. During a debate, she attacked her opponent, Senator Dean Heller, with the same issue. “My opponent is failing the people of the state of Nevada,” she said. She stated that online poker would add 1,200 jobs in Nevada. “My opponent is not doing his job. Either he does not have an understanding of how important this is to the state of Nevada, or he’s not caring.” That was merely political posturing because Heller has also been a supporter of online poker.
Another prominent Senator flip flopped on Internet poker and he’s probably the last person who you’d expect--Jon Kyl. In 2011, Kyl posted this statement on his website: “Efforts to carve out an exception for games like poker, which many believe is a game of skill, may be considered later this year. Until I have the chance to review them, I cannot make a judgment about their merits; but I will consider them carefully as long as they leave in place the broader proscriptions against online
The Bipartisan Reform act of 2002, which is also known as McCain Feingold Act is a United States federal law that changed the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, and adjusted the financing of political campaigns. It included many arrangements to end the use of “soft money”, which is a contribution to a political party that is not assumed as going to a specific candidate, and ignores many legal limitations. It banned national parties from raising or spending non federal funds, limited fundraising by federal and non-federal candidates and officeholders on behalf of party committees, other candidates, and non profit organizations. The act was proposed by John McCain and Rusell Feingold. They were both senators that kept promoting the passing
He has attempted to present gambling as the panacea to cure all Alabama’s economic problems. John Robertson, a former Alabama governor, said “gambling brings the bad people to town and brings out the bad in good people.” Alabamians should have good reasons to oppose legalizing gambling. In the 1940s and early 1950s, Phenix City became the “wickedest city in America” and the home of a powerful crime syndicate. Albert Patterson was murdered in 1954 because he waged a race for attorney general on the promise to rid Phenix City of gambling.
Both Ralph Northam and Ed Gillespie have differing plans on what they think will provide for the best healthcare for Virginia citizens. It is important to fully understand and analyze their ideas before deciding on who to vote
Gaming and gambling are both regulated under Nevada laws and regulations there is a Gaming Policy Committee, a Nevada Gaming Commission, The Gaming Control Board, and even a “Black Book” of people prohibited from going into any Nevada casino. Nevada Voters or the Merit Plan? Recent attempts to move Nevada to the Merit Plan have included these: in 1972, 1988, voters rejected proposals for a merit plan and again in 2010 a plan was submitted to Nevadan voters but was rejected by a 58-42 margin. That plan was approved by legislature in 2007 and
Sam Brownback, the 46th Governor of Kansas, has one goal in mind and that is to make Kansas the best place for families to grow. However, as of now, Brownback is not able to achieve his goal because he had caused a massive state debt due to cutting taxes. These controversial actions can put Kansas in a dark hole. Brownback was elected again by the Kansas citizens in 2014. Sam Brownback should not have been elected again as the Governor of Kansas because he is cutting money for public schooling, he is increasing the tax rate on the lower class and middle class to make up for his debt, and increasing taxes are causing Kansans to flee.
Lawmakers rarely interrelate straightforwardly with other states on strategy, but the laws that Congress Senate approves, can influence
In 2014, President Obama reprimanded Republicans for having “filibustered
Governor John Bel Edwards of Louisiana enacted an executive order on January 14 to expand Medicaid through Obamacare in the state. The order will be effective July 1, 2016. Obamacare, also known as Affordable Care Act (ACA), is a healthcare reform law that aims to care for the health of U.S. citizens. More specifically, this law helps lower-income family access an affordable health care through taxes. Barack Obama made it his primary objective to pass this healthcare reform law, and signed it on March 23, 2010.
Atlantic City was once the powerhouse of the east coast raking in tourists, large sums of money, and monopolizing the gambling industry. Nick Paumgarten wrote “The Death and Life of Atlantic City”, which states “The casino closures in Atlantic City have contributed to the loss of nearly 10,000 jobs, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics” (102). Four out of the twelve casinos closed which contributed to 8,000 of those jobs. Three of the remaining casinos are currently facing bankruptcy which contributes to the other 2,000 people left jobless. The question Atlantic City is faced with a matter of needing more gambling or less?
Collectively, we urge your support for S3111 and respectfully ask for the bill to be posted for a vote in the Senate Budget Committee. We applaud Senator Gill for the introduction of S3111 and Senator Kean and Beach for signing on as co-sponsors of the bill. S3111 was passed out of the Senate Commerce Committee with unanimous support. We urge the members of the Budget Committee to lend their support for successful passage of S3111.
Technical support The largest issues caused by the bill are direct conflicts between U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Alaska Department of Natural Resources (ADNR). The supporters of HJR 69 boasted faulty claims for support, using a political platform created by Trump to oppose all Obama-era rules for being too liberal (Ruskin 2017). Comments in support of HJR 69 state that the prohibitions would affect Alaska residents’ access to hunting land and subsistence hunting. Proponents of the bill also voiced fears that the federal government would take state land as well as control over it, thus taking power from states.
He points out that even the people in charge of writing the senate bill do not want to call a casino a casino out of fear that the bill would be pushed aside at the mention of a
AARP strongly opposes ANY bill that raises healthcare costs and lowers coverage. AARP urged the Senate to focus on bipartisan solutions that will lower the cost and improve care for the American people. They also gave out a number so their members could call their Senators and complain. There were a ton of comments on their page about
In 1993, Scott Russell Sanders responds to an essay written by Salman Rushdie, to counteract the idea of “people who transplant themselves in ideas rather than places.” Sanders provides the American public with acknowledgements of counter-arguments, historical references, and patriotic appeals to convey his message that “movement is inherently good” isn’t as it seems from Rushdie’s point of view. Sanders respects Rushdie’s views on migration and uses them to strengthen his argument through countering Rushdie’s views. Sanders cites Rushdie’s claim that “migrants must, of necessity, make a new imaginative relationship with the world, because of the loss of familiar habitats” (47-50). Sanders acknowledges Rushdie’s view on migrants opening up to new ideas due to them leaving their homelands.
However, his proposed bill would not explicitly make marijuana legal, rather it would take it off the federal scheduling of the CSA. This allows states to make their own laws to prohibit marijuana, if they want