Henri Fayol (1841-1925) was a French mining engineer, mining executive, management theorist and author. Based on his experience in the mining sector where large numbers of people were employed, he developed what is now known as the “14 Principles of Management”. In a nutshell, the fourteen management principles of Henri Fayol is categorised under the following heads : (1) Division of Work, (2) Authority, (3) Discipline, (4) Unity of Command, (5) Unity of Direction, (6) Subordination of individual interest, (7) Remuneration, (8) Centralisation (or Decentralisation), (9) Scalar chain (Line of Authority), (10) Order, (11) Equity, (12) Stability of Tenure of Personnel, (13) Initiative, and (14) Esprit de Corps.
These 14 principles, or “Fayol’s
…show more content…
To achieve its objective, this assignment will first discuss the principle of authority and responsibility as explained by Fayol. Secondly, this assignment will look at an independent view of Fayol’s principles by another author and discuss the criticism of those principles by that author. Finally, the assignment will focus on the current management practices of the Fiji Police Force and compare it with Fayol’s principle to determine its applicability in the …show more content…
The Constitution places the organisation under the command of the Commissioner of Police who is not subject to direction or control by any other authority in this regard. By the very nature of it roles and responsibilities stipulated in section 5 of the Act, the organisation is authority driven where superiors give directives and subordinates are required to obey without question or option.
The organisation has a cardinal rule – “do first, complain later”. This concept of management fits in well with Fayol’s experience of the mining sector where executives then gave orders and employees (miners) meekly complied. Collective decision making where officers of all ranks are consulted on any impending directive which directly affects them is unheard of. Decisions are made in the commissioner office or after consultation amongst the chief officers consisting of very senior officers, a formal directive is issued. The same concept applies at departmental, divisional, district and station level. Perhaps, by the very nature of its work, the organisation needs this type of
Since William Westley’s seminal study in the 1950s, reports of a monolithic police culture have focused on the broadly collective attitudes, values, and norms that serve to manage strains created by the nature of police work and the disciplinary practices of police management and supervision (Brown, 1988; Crank, 1998; Drummond, 1976; Fielding, 1988; Kappeler, Sluder & Alpert, 1998; Manning, 1995; McNamara, 1967; Reiner, 1985; Reuss-Ianni, 1983; Rubinstein, 1973; Skolnick, 1994; Sparrow, Moore & Kennedy, 1990; Van Maanen, 1974 (1975?) ; Westley, 1970). A monolithic culture, which strives towards the homogeneity of attitudes, values, and norms associated with a single culture, could be projected to break up because organisational philosophies change (Chan, 1996; Fielding, 1994; Paoline et al.,
1) Identify aspects of Jim Quintero’s management style according to the four main management theories (Classical, Behavioral, Systems, and Contingency). While most organizations can more than likely identify at least some aspects from each of the four management theories, Quintero’s steel company identifies most with the Behavioral Approach with aspects of the Systems and Contingency Approach blending together in my opinion. Not having much detail on Cool Steel Company’s (CSC) organizational structural it is difficult to determine how much management falls under the Classical Approach, but seeing there are managers (not first-level supervisors) and reviewing Henri Fayol’s general principals, one can assume a structure of sorts. There are several examples of the Behavioral Approach (e.g., trusting, respect, responsibility…) that will be covered in more detail in response to question number two. It is clear that CSC’s success would be in line with the practices described in the cooperative system outlined in the Systems Approach and by virtue of employees being given the ability or responsibility to make decisions; the Contingency Approach can be applied.
When given authority, it can be easy for people to take advantage of their power. The police must be able to use their power with respect and trust to maintain integrity and ethics. Although many police officers remain loyal to their communities, there are some cases where police are known to take advantage of their authority. With these of using authority to conduct racial profiling, it is difficult for communities to feel safe with police authorities. Police integrity can be maintained through the use of accountability of supervisors and peers (National Institute of Justice).
INTRODUCTION As greatly as societies may differ, one cannot deny that they all connect in possessing one factor that is paramount to their stability: The Law. Evidently, one cannot talk about the law without summoning to mind the parties that enforce it. The police, as one may know it nowadays, protect and serve the community from harm and injustice. What happens, however, when said injustice becomes grounds for some policemen’s actions?
Assignment #1 Review questions Chap. 1 p. 26: 1. A single standard of ethics cannot be applied to all criminal justice agencies. The world is too complex to legislate morality and ethics. The cultures that make up each part of the world are not the same.
The author ultimate hypothesis focuses on two aspects relating to authority. The first aspect is that the uniform, from the view of the subordinate is one of absolute authority and power. So much it comes to the point where the guards, the authority, appear to be physically larger. This was found to be the case even when the guards were the same physical size.
It is easy to learn about a subject from a book, but it is an entirely different matter to learn about a subject through real life experience. I hope to learn how to serve and protect while implementing the law correctly, especially in today’s world when the level of support for police officers is very low and the level of misconduct cases concerning the police are very high. It is not easy to know what to do in every situation, especially when some reactions are needed with very little or no time to think about. It is one thing to hear about a crime happening and the response that would be best to give, and another thing to need
The reasons that are set out must be reasons which will not only be intelligible, but which deal with the substantial points that have been raised.’ Many of the observations made in Mallak can find their genesis in South Bucks. For example, the reference in South Bucks to the need only to refer to the main issues, rather than every material consideration, is redolent of Mallak. In conclusion, it is the writer’s opinion that administrative authorities should have a general duty to give reasons imposed upon them.
McGregor argued, “Management is responsible for organizing the elements of productive enterprise-money, materials, equipment, people-in the interest of economic ends” (p.154). The author begins its
Introduction- The leadership and management are two important pillars of modern day business. “You manage things; you lead people” Grace Hopper (retired Admiral, U.S. Navy). On one hand managers, not only motivate people but they also set the course of direction and organize to achieve the targets.
According to Mary Parker Follet (1941), management is the process of “getting things done through people”. (Khan A. Imaad,2008). Over the course of the years many theories and perspectives have been created as a conclusive result of many research studies. Two such approaches are the theory of ‘Scientific Management’ and the ‘Human Relations’ approach. Frederick Taylor’s Scientific Management is popularly known as the first theory in management history (Stoner, Edward, Gilbert, 2003).
TASK 1.1 Importance of operation management Operations management (OM) is the business function responsible for managing the process of creation of goods and services. It involves planning, organizing, coordinating, and controlling all the resources needed to produce a company’s goods and services. Because operations management is a management function, it involves managing people, equipment, technology, information, and all the other resources needed in the production of goods and services. Operations management is the central core function of every company. This is true regardless of the size of the company, the industry it is in, whether it is manufacturing or service, or is for-profit or not-for-profit.
One of the challenges includes job responsibilities and expectations. The law enforcement community and officers may have varying responsibilities when it comes to their jobs, missions as well as professional cultures with varying expectations in regards to the definition of bullying, what constitutes suitable response4s to bullying and the ways it can be prevented. Law enforcement officers and school personnel’s more often operate according to various rules. For instance, school officials have a set of school rules and codes to enforce while law enforcement officers must at all times uphold the law. Another challenge is negative perception.
`For the purpose of this assignment I have chosen to compare and contrast the contribution of Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915) and Henri Fayol (1841-1925) to the field of management. I will outline the similarities and differences between Taylor and Fayol and then conclude and elaborate on how these two theorists’ work influenced the world of management both in the past and at the present moment. Frederick Winslow Taylor born in focused his theories heavily on the scientific method, finding the ‘one best way’ to manage a firm and its personnel, (Kanigel 1999). Taylor focused on the operative level, he believed that the application of scientific methods from the bottom of the industrial hierarchy upwards was the key to success. Taylor
The role of management in motivating Conclusion The 14 principles of management founded by Mr Henri Fayol can be used to manage organizations and are useful tools for forecasting, planning, process management, organization management, decision-making, coordination and control. These logical principles are generally based on common sense and matter of fact currently been practiced widely by organisation.