2. The translation technique The translation technique is very simple yet effective. Essentially, you repeat in different words what the other party has just said. Almost any attack can be dealt with using this flexible technique, so it pays to practice it often enough that it becomes second nature to you. How does it work? You basically act as an interpreter, translating your opponent’s malicious words. For example: “So you mean to say that…” It may not sound very spectacular, but it opens up unforeseen possibilities. You take it upon yourself to explain to your counterpart what he just said – but in your own words. You thus take control of the direction in which the discussion will proceed. The translation technique is especially well-suited to the following situations: • Responding to personal insults • …show more content…
Schuster has the following dialogue with his coach: COACH: Dr. Schuster, your proposal has clearly been very well thought out. But instead of discussing it today, we should rather talk about whether… DR. SCHUSTER: Let’s return to the proposal – it’s what’s on the agenda for today. COACH: Well, the reasoning behind your plan is quite convincing. But first, let’s consider another aspect… DR. SCHUSTER: Before we consider this new aspect, I’d like to add that… The dialectics of war and peace The word “dialectic” comes from the Greek dialegein (“to converse”). Dialectic is the art of discourse – the ability to arrive at a higher truth via the discussion and comparison of conflicting propositions. This is something essential to negotiation. According to renowned German rhetoric coach Rupert Lay, the art of dialectic (ars dialectica) can be divided into two domains: the dialectic of peace and the dialectic of war. In the context of negotiations, competitive negotiators will generally prefer the dialectic of war, while cooperative negotiators will tend towards the dialectic of
Joe Johnson 01/04/18 Writ 1122 Online Yin & Yang To begin, it is important to lay out the definition that each Lloyd Bitzer and Richard Vatz give to the rhetorical situation. According to Lloyd Bitzer “Rhetorical situation may be defined as a complex of persons, events, objects, and relations presenting an actual or potential exigence which can be completely or partially removed if discourse, introduced into the situation, can so constrain human decisions or action as to bring about the significant modification of the exigence.” (Bitzer) Put into layman’s terms, Lloyd Bitzer believes that there are three main parts that create a rhetorical situation – Exigence, Audience, and a set of constraints.
A Separate Peace is a coming of age novel written by John Knowles. Throughout the novel the Apollonian and Dionysian sides of man are constantly at battle. The Apollonian side is based on reason, logic and order whereas the Dionysian side is based on nature and chaos and appeals to the emotions and instincts. In Chapter 11 the Dionysian and Apollonian sides of man are illustrated through an interaction between Finny, Gene, and Brinker: Brinker and three cohorts came with much commotion into Finny and Gene’s room at 10:05 p.m. that night:
Throughout countless lives, conflict is regarded as a common fact of life that one must endure. People must learn to handle stress and pressure while also being open to the ideas and feelings of others. Many more people over the years have tried to decipher the best way to deal with these unfortunate happenings and some have come within the smaller measure to achieving the great feat. While this may be a complicated and sinuous road to travel, the benefits of various practices can add amazing improvement to one’s way of living and can even help others in order to benefit all of society. Perhaps the best way to deal with conflict is to simply not give up or not stay silent when conflict and wrongdoings are happening such as in “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat” by Winston Churchill and in “Nobel Peace Prize Acceptance Speech” by Elie Wiesel and perhaps a closer look must be taken at how these methods affect the situation, how they affect those involved, and how this can help with a person’s emotional well-being.
The two sides were as passionate as they were devise. Each opposing side had forerunning leaders, who sought to persuade
Bloodshed and brotherhood versus facts and forum, both items can be combined to discuss different types of war. War is often seen as cruel, violent or destructive but that doesn’t define the entire idea. There are whole sublevels of war from within oneself up to humanity pitted one against the other. However, there is one common theme that concerns all levels and types of war, which is that war is unique. Unique in that the two sides of war can vary so greatly, yet the issue is still in essence a war.
In the Introduction, Jay Heinrichs provides the reader with a foundation about the upcoming concepts on rhetoric, persuasion, seduction, and argument used in our everyday lives and in writing. Throughout this section, he discusses rhetoric that he encounters throughout life and without rhetoric it is merely impossible. He tries to go through a non rhetorical day, but it turns “out to be pretty darn rhetorical, but nonetheless agreeable” (11). Rhetoric prevents fighting, because without an agreement, people use fighting as a way of arguing. So, although people may see rhetoric as manipulation and/or seduction, it provides an agreement, within an otherwise violent, aggravating argument.
The moral basis on which we have come to interpret the conflict becomes decidedly more complex and morally
Not over complicating things and making it difficult for people to understand. Listening to what someone else as to say and then responding if
These sacred contradictions were aggravated by religious hostilities and money related questions. Both sides guaranteed that they remained for the principle of law, yet war was by definition a matter of
Reflection on Medication Administration Description (Competency 3j) I have looked over my moral development regarding medicine administration and have noticed there is the need for improved and has been agreed with my mentor to write a piece of reflection to identify areas of concern Feelings One of the major concern is the pace of dispensing and the time spent used to open charts and allocate them is one of my weakness. Although I am learner I need to back up the pace of dispensing so that patient doesn 't feel my skills is dull or boring and waste of time. I Had developed that feeling of being extra careful to avoid drug error and that makes me feel slightly nervous more also being under the influence of supervision as well. Evaluation
Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.
As described earlier in the introduction part, I have recalled different courses of negotiation in my life from which I have tried to figure out my weaknesses and strengths. Before the negotiation course, I could only realize some of my capacity and limits, for example I might be good at emotional control and bad at active listening. I believed they were not all the weaknesses and strengths that I should realize. In addition, I found it hard to hone my strengths and improve my weaknesses because (i) I did not see negotiation in systematic viewpoint (ii) I have not had enough negotiation experiences. Thankfully, this course has shed the new light on the wide scope of negotiations and how they should be conducted.
A translator may subject him-/herself either to the original text, with the norms it has realized, or to the norms active in the target culture, or in that section of it which would host the end product. Translation is a complicated task, during which the meaning of the source-language text should be conveyed to the target-language readers. In other words, translation can be defined as encoding the meaning and form in the target language by means of the decoded meaning and form of the source language. Different theorists state various definitions for translation.
The case “Alpha – Beta” is a very interesting case, which could be considered as one of my most favorable cases so far. What interested me was the fact that we had to act totally different from our conventional style. In fact, we were asked to behave collectively, formally, indirectly, patiently, unemotionally and passively. Although we could not make the deal, we all found this outcome understandable and predictable. What we learned from the exercise was to be aware of the existence of cross-cultural differences as well as how these differences affect our negotiation outcomes, then find out what should we do in the similar negotiation in our future.
The film Lost in Translation follows two Americans visiting Tokyo during important transitional periods in their lives. Charlotte is a recent college graduate trying to figure out her career while also moving on from the honeymoon phase of her new marriage. Bob Harris is an actor essentially going through a mid-life crisis as he sorts through life post-movie stardom and struggles to maintain a relationship with his overbearing wife. The two find each other in a hotel bar as a result of their inability to sleep and form a connection based on their mutual isolation in both their relationships and the city of Tokyo. The film touches on the importance of communication as well as what it is like to be a foreigner alone in a vastly different culture.