Case Report: Posterior Hip Dislocation with Ipsilateral Femoral Head and Shaft Fracture - Using a Temporary External Fixator as a Method for Closed Reduction
Abduljabbar Alhammouda,1, Mason AlNouria, Abdulmoeen Bacoa a Hamad Medical Corporation, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, P.O. Box 3050, Doha, Qatar Corresponding author. Email: aghammoud85@hotmail.com
All of the authors stated above have read and approved this manuscript
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare
Type of Manuscript: Case Report Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Complex fractures are increasing because of various traumatic mechanisms. They drift from standard classifications, and their treatment is controversial. Of such cases are hip dislocations with associated
…show more content…
Clinical examination, X-rays, and CT scan revealed a posterior hip dislocation with an ipsilateral femoral head and mid-shaft fractures. The patient was treated by closed reduction of hip dislocation using a temporarily applied external fixator followed by intramedullary nailing of the femoral shaft.
DISCUSSION: Achieving a closed reduction is a challenge with ipsilateral fractures, but it should be favored over open reduction due to a lower risk of complications. The type of femoral head fracture, in this case, may have aided in an easier reduction.
CONCLUSION: Hip dislocation is an orthopedic emergency, its treatment is challenging if associated with ipsilateral fractures. The decision of a closed versus an open approach should be made after considering the management plans of other
…show more content…
The patient was taken to the operating theater for closed versus open reduction and intramedullary nailing of the left femur. Within 5 hours of his injury, the patient underwent closed reduction of the left hip with the aid of a temporary external fixator applied on the femoral shaft proximal to the fracture. The external fixator rod was used as a handle, and the reduction was successful after the first attempt, as confirmed by the C-arm (Figure 2). Subsequently, the external fixator was removed, and intramedullary nailing of the left femur was carried out. After completion of the procedure, the left hip was examined and found to be stable with the femoral head fragment not affecting the movement. The patient was discharged after three days with a clean, dry wound and full weight bearing ambulation as tolerated. Unfortunately, he was lost to follow-up and attempts to contact the patient were
If Arthroscopic Surgery is possible three incision are made in the knee under short general anesthetic, the patient can return home the same day and begin rehabilitation
DOI: 4/16/2012. Patient is a 29-year-old male technician who sustained injury when he was 25-feet up on a ladder when the ladder slid and he fell onto the pavement. He had an open reduction internal fixation (ORIF x 2) for a compound tibia fibula fracture and had hardware removal in 4/25/2013. MRI of the lumbar spine performed on 3/24/2016 revealed L5-S1 small right paracentral disc protrusion without significant spinal canal stenosis or neuroforaminal narrowing.
DOI: 7/28/2014. Patient is a 33-year old male laborer who sustained injury when his left wrist twisted and snapped while using a drill. Per OMNI, he was initially diagnosed with dislocation of the left wrist. He underwent a tendon graft reconstruction on 08/07/14 and hardware removal on 09/11/14.
Given this child’s age and greater than 50% of the femoral head is involved as determined by the radiograph, his outcome is poor and treatment is more similar to adult femoral head osteonecrosis (Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children, n.d.). Surgical treatment options for his age may include femoral and pelvic osteotomies; however a perfusion MRI should be performed to assess the extent of femoral head involvement (Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children,
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: NATIONALLY RENOWNED ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON CO-AUTHORS HIP SURGERY ARTICLE TO BE PRINTED IN THE PRESTIGIOUS BONE & JOINT JOURNAL Douglas J. Roger, M.D., is a pioneer of the Direct Superior Hip Replacement Approach. He co-authored the research article "Greater Inadvertent Muscle Damage in Direct Anterior Approach when Compared to the Direct Superior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty," which is "in press" to be printed in the Bone & Joint Journal. PALM SPRINGS, Calif., Oct. 22, 2015 – Dr. Douglas J. Roger is a nationally renowned industry leader in the field of hip replacement surgery. He also co-authored the research article, "Greater Inadvertent Muscle Damage in Direct Anterior Approach when Compared to the Direct Superior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty," with Derek F. Amanatullah, M.D., Ph.D., Mark W.
. What is a compound fracture? (2 points) A compound fracture is a broken bone that protrudes through the skin. 2.
In addition, this procedure can be performed in two ways: posterior and anterior approaches. The posterior hip replacement is the traditional procedure in repairing the hip joint. For this technique, the surgeon would make a curved incision on the side of the hip on the gluteal muscles. For the other procedure, the anterior hip replacement, a surgeon would have to maneuver between the muscle to gain access to the hip joint through the front part of the hip (Kruse). The main difference between the two approaches is how the surgeon opens the body to reach the hip.
Patient has had progressive pain, numbness, and weakness in both lower extremities. He has had an epidural, physical therapy, and medications. It was reiterated that the patient has lost over 30 pounds. He has clear-cut instability as documented by the pars fracture and the spondylolisthesis, which is mobile on flexion/extension films.
The second fracture is significantly larger, most likely the finishing blow; it intersects with the first, travelling from the sagittal suture to the squamosal suture, from the squamosal suture to the cranial base, from the base to the ear canal, and from the ear canal to the left squamosal suture. The right side of the face also has signs of trauma at the right eye socket, nose, back teeth, and cheek areas. In the thorax, right ribs 6-9 had buckle and spiral
Patient Specific Diagnosis and Profile: The patient is a 66-year-old Caucasian female who sustained bi-lateral distal radial fractures that were repaired with ORIF surgery. The patient is right hand dominant. The injury resulted from a fall while the patient was doing yard work. The patient was pulling on a branch and fell backwards on both outstretched hands.
Introduction Total hip arthroplasty (total hip replacement) is an orthopedic procedure that involves the surgical removal of the head and proximal neck of the femur and removal of the acetabular cartilage and subchondral bone – the damaged bone and cartilage is removed and replaced with prosthetic components. For successful results, the total hip arthroplasty components must be secured firmly to the bone, either with polymethylmethacrylate cement or, in more recent uncemented designs, by bony ingrowth into a porous coating on the implant, resulting in "biologic" fixation. Total hip arthroplasty was first introduced in the United States in 1969 and is currently one of the most widely performed procedures in orthopedic practice and has been shown to be successful in eliminating pain and restoring function in hips with diseases such as osteoarthritis (Siopack & Jergesen, 1995). There are two types of
Aortic Dissection: Hemiarch Versus Total Arch Replacement Taylor Aubin Sinclair Community College October 1, 2015 Aortic dissection is a life threatening condition in which the intima, the inner most layer, of the aorta tears. As the blood flows through the aorta it rushes through this tear resulting in dissection of the intima from the media, the middle layer of the aorta. This unfortunate condition is often fatal if the newly created false lumen ruptures through the aortic wall.
There were no significant differences in the mean stay in the hospital or in the ICU. The fractures that were most often missed were those of the cuboid or the metarsalia. The highest risk factor for a delayed diagnosis was a fracture already diagnosed on the same foot. In 52.4% of the delayed diagnosed fractures, an operative therapy was necessary. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the clinical results.”
Research tells us that about 25% of older adults who suffer a fracture will have a second fracture within the next 5 years (Southerland, 1). We also know that half of older adults will require home health care within 6 months following a fracture, and many of those people will have long-term functional decline. With this in mind it is clear to see why fractures can be so devastating in the older adult population. Often times an older adult is hospitalized for a fracture, due to the fracture they remain immobile for several days to weeks and eventually become extremely ill from a secondary infection such as pneumonia. Fractures in children or young adults most commonly cause slim to none permanent decline and outcomes are mostly positive after several months of recover.
There was an experience where a nurse was assigned to him and she gave him hundred percent attention and took complete care of him. She kept him relaxed, communicated on a personal level and listened to him. Consequently, as we discussed earlier, this has improved Mr.Taylor’s experience. Key facilitators for Mr. Taylor’s health care experience Mr.Taylor is generally satisfied with the health care provided by the dp clinic chosen by him. The surgeon he visited was brutally honest with him which helped Mr.Taylor understand the seriousness of the injury.