The United States we know today is the product of many different events and ideologies. From war to peace, and from isolation to internationalism, 44 different presidents with many altered circumstances participate in shaping the United States we know today. Scholars have subsequently discussed the way US Presidents manage foreign affairs, and they are still debating the successes and failures, or which among them deserve the most credit. In this research paper, I discuss the foreign policy of president Jimmy Carter and I examine the basic principals he stood on. Carter had many actions coming from a human rights approach. I will be discussing them with the principals underling these actions. I will then be linking his actions to the balancing …show more content…
Carter’s basic ideas were coming from his own personal moral interpretations. “I promised you four years ago that I would never lie to you” (Carter, n.d.) He came with the right ideas in the right time, which paved his way to the white house. Especially in 1976, Americans wanted someone like him. He came with very decent ideas, which was the opposite of the Nixon’s administration. Americans needed to rebuild trust in their leadership after the failures in Vietnam War. Carter’s basic ideas were clear from the beginning of his elections campaign. Carter was a Democrat, and also was an idealist. “We are a proudly idealistic nation,” (Carter, 1997) Carter said in his Inaugural address. He wanted to reflect the highest moral principals in his foreign policy but I believe Carter had high expectations for his foreign policy but he did not know how to meet them. His principals can be seen clearly from his inaugural address when he said: “Our commitment to human rights must be absolute, our laws fair, our national beauty preserved, the powerful must not persecute the weak, and human dignity must be enhanced.” (Carter, 1997). He was focusing on human rights, his annual submission by the Department of State of a full and complete report on human rights practices around the world (“Carter's Foreign …show more content…
From the beginning, having the Shah in was a totally unwise decision because it will reflect a negative image to the new Iranian government. Not only that, also they were in a revolutionary situation where all people are radicalized. This crisis was of the nastiest crises to the American people because it affected them directly and affected public opinion in the United States for 444 days. Correspondingly, I believe that it’s Carter’s baggiest failure and if it didn’t happen or it was managed differently, I would probably have a different opinion on his foreign policy. What is worse than the problem itself is the way he interacted with it. Carter's failure to negotiate with the Iranians was obvious to the world, but what made it even worse was the badly failed rescue mission. Operation Eagle Claw failure showed the American people that their great country miscarries in front of a small country like Iran. Not only that, but by the end of the operation the prestigious group of special operations Delta Force had lost 8 of its members (Kamps, 2006). President Carter’s inability to resolve the problem made him look like a weak and ineffectual leader. At the same time, his intense focus on bringing the hostages home kept him away from the campaign trail. (Iran Hostage Crisis,
Then he mentioned that people distrusted the government and worried about the energy crisis. Also, he acknowledged that there were some mistakes in the government, and there was a fundamental threat to American democracy. However, more and more people lost their confidence in the development of the country, President Carter regarded it as “the crisis of confidence”. He considered that it was not happening overnight, but happened for a long time with shocks and tragedy. Therefore, he encouraged people to have faith in each other and have faith in the nation to get through the difficulties.
The role that Reagan’s actions played in ending the Cold War has been a controversial topic ever since the war came to a close. This investigation will show that, to a good extent, Reagan’s actions
President Report Brady Nelson 3/4/15 ”America did not invent human rights in a very real sense human rights invented America.”President James Earl Carter Jr.was a president of the united states of america. When Carter was a little kid he shot his sister with a BB gun he got his when she threw a wrench at him. ( Bio .com) President Carter when he was older wrote a book called Little Baby Snoogle-Fleejer.
Jimmy Carter, a former US president effectively incorporates logos – facts and evidence, pathos – appealing word choice and emotion, and ethos – credibility to build his persuasive argument. Carter strives to contend that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. First, throughout the article, there are many situations where Jimmy Carter incorporates facts and examples. For example, he states, “The Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day.” By using such numbers, Carter forces the reader to evaluate the situation by recognizing the difference between an insignificant financial income and enormous damage to the territory.
Foreign policy wise, Nixon, while still in office, began to follow Realpolitik, a policy that allowed him to create relationships with both the Soviet Union and China because it no longer required morality to be a considering factor. This change in foreign policy caused concern for Americans because of the fear of communism.
However, he made his best effort to resolve social issues in a matter that benefited Americans that may not share the same religious views that he does. For many years, social issues such as abortion have created controversy because some people believe that religion and politics should be kept separate. However, the problem occurs when the social issue goes against one’s personal beliefs. Roe v Wade finally allowed abortions to be legal in the United States just a few years prior to Jimmy Carter being elected. The numbers of abortions being performed rose and caused many conservatives to try and get the law repealed.
Regardless of Jimmy Carter 's signals toward poor people and African Americans he kept on securing corporate riches and influence, kept up a colossal military machine that depleted the countries riches, and partnered the US with oppressive regimes abroad. The greater part of Carter 's significant bureau arrangements were given to affluent or bureau developer from more seasoned organizations. This offered certainty to rich businesspeople. Carter consolidated down to earth key needs with the headway of civil rights to convey business chances to American representatives. Carter combined practical key needs with the headway of civil rights to convey business chances to American businessmen.
One thing that made this speech so impactful was the use of ethos, and the ways he used to build a relationship with Americans through trust. “And I realize more than ever that as President I need your help. So, I decided to reach out and to listen to the voices of America” (Energy and the National Goals - A Crisis of Confidence). President Carter tried to prove his credibility through his position as President. He tried appealing himself to the audience’s sense of trust.
In his comments, Reagan says Carter has misrepresented the evidence because he has not provided context on government spending in California . Carter fails to provide evidence for how his new policies will decrease inflation . Reagan’s claim that inflation rose sharply under Carter is supported by the data. Reasons and evidence that Reagan uses to support his argument include the increase in inflation rates and the number of jobs lost . The reasons and evidence that President Carter use to support his argument include the decrease in inflation rates and the number of new jobs created .In
Jimmy Carter builds a compelling argument to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. He has evidence to back up his argument. He uses reasoning to develop ideas and uses persuasive elements to get his point across. Jimmy uses facts or examples to support his claims.
Rhetorical Analysis: A Crisis of Confidence by Jimmy E. Carter From his speech in the Oval Office, 39th US President, Jimmy Earl Carter uses several rhetorical methods to get his point across to the American public. He rallies the audience to a common goal using diction, charged language, and rhetorical appeals like ethos and pathos. This is all in an attempt to help the citizens of America understand the necessity of confidence in our actions to fight against foreign dependence in the energy crisis. Carter utilizes diction to prove the necessity of his argument through using the repetition of statements pertaining to confidence in one’s actions.
Last of all, debates in the past have also helped us determine the next president because of how the candidate acts during the debates and how they respond to the questions. ’’During the second debate between President Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter … Ford botched a line about Soviet influence in Eastern Europe. “There is no Soviet domination of Eastern Europe,” said Ford … Ford’s answer was at complete odds with the reality of the Cold War.
However, they contrast because they had two different ways of achieving this goal and only one was successful. In the pdf, Reagan quotes that “We need more energy and that means diversifying our sources of supply away from the OPEC countries.” Both Reagan and Carter felt that Americans depended too much on the OPEC. Both felt that coal was the answer.
Carter and the government took a big hit for not rescuing the hostages in the embassy. Carter also took a lot of criticism for not improving the economy in the United States. The country was going through a period of high unemployment, rising inflation, and the impact of having not enough energy when Carter took office. Carter was able to give 8 million people jobs, but that was not enough for the people and they still blamed the president for their problems.
Most countries have at least a slight respect for their leader, but that isn't always the case. It is very rare for middle eastern countries to disrespect a ruler, let alone speak out on their opinion. In the book Persepolis by Marjane Satrapi, the Satrapi family were adversaries of the Shah. They joined a plethora of other Iranian citizens in speaking out against the Shah. All of the Iranian adversaries banded together to bring down the rule of Reza Shah.