Natural Justice Literature Review

3719 Words15 Pages

LITRATURE REVIEW

Sri S. Chakravarthi, in his book “Natural Justice”, has very appropriately summed up the constituents of the rules of natural justice. They are:
• Substantial requirement of justice shall not be violated.
• The tribunal must give both the parties an opportunity of being heard and stating their case and view.
• Notice to be given to the parties about when the judge will proceed with the matter.
• The tribunal should act honestly and impartially.
• Must not be at the dictation of others to whom no authority has been given by law.
• There must not be malversation of any kind.
• A person cannot be a judge in his own cause.
• The least bias or prejudice on the part of the person deciding the cause will vitiate the order.
Doctrine of …show more content…

The word ‘Natural Justice’ indicates justice according to one’s own morals. It is derived from the Roman Concept ‘jus - naturale’ and ‘Lex naturale’ which meant principle of natural law, natural justice, eternal law, natural equity or good conscience.It was remarked by Lord Evershed , that “Natural Justice is the natural sense of what is right and wrong.”

The three pillars of THE DOCTRINE OFN NATURAL JUSTICE

1. Nemo debet esse judex in propria causa: No man must sit in judgment in his own cause, or the deciding authority must be impartial and without bias.

It is also called as the ‘doctrine of bias’ as the judge may have a preconception in the case. It has been briefly put by Sir Edward Coke, namely, Vacate, Interrogate and Judicate, i.e., call, question, and adjudicate. However, this notion has been through lot of changes in recent times, but fundamental still remain same.

Types of Bias: There are three types of Bias -
(i) Pecuniary Bias:
1. Dimes vs. Grant Junction Canal. (1852,3 HLC 579).
2. Jeejeebhoy vs. Asst. Collector of Thana. (AIR 1965 SC 1096)
(ii) Personal

Open Document