Relationship Between Non-Governmental Organizations And International Organizations

Question 1

The Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO) and the International Organizations (INGO) play important roles in ensuring political and economic stability in countries and the entire world respectively. To achieve this, the international organizations like the United Nations (UN) have managed to ensure political stability in its member states through maintaining peace and security. The UN achieves this through managing peacekeeping forces that are sourced from the member states. These peacekeeping forces are always sent to areas where war has just ended to prevent any further eruption of revenge (Rittberger, Zangl & Kruck, 2012). The international organizations also play a vital role in economic development, for example, the UN Development

Norms provide a shared understanding of the accepted behavior, which results in sedimentation. The idea supports the role of agents and how they influence the international politics through the framework that get developed from the norms. These expectations of the required behavior are important and can become much powerful to have effectively a limitation on the political actions globally and, in particular, the norms surrounding the organization of the political economy and trade. Norms have played a significant influence on the international politics indirectly (Keck & Sikkink, 2014). It is observed to act this way by constraining the behavior of the agents in a certain way in a framework created by the

And their path to get accepted is often rough. Under the influence of the Americans and the European nations, attempts have been made to give strength to the international human regime and to develop a doctrine of the humanitarian interventions. In this instance, the American and European nations seem to consider other nations as subjects in their attempts to establish individuals as international actors.

The norms might be less binding in case the non-western nations begin influencing the creation and evolution of the international norms. This is because it is the changes in the attitudes in the leading nations that bring about changes in the international norms

Driven by natural factors, certain international norms would evolve and change within a decade. For example norm of the survival for the fittest would evolve due to improvement and development of the guiding of the international bodies like the United Nations. The evolution of the international norms comes as a result of internalization. Through internalization, the norms of force, legitimacy and price are likely to evolve since all the three have pathways to