Based on the article on the study of organizational change management, change usually happens in an organization where there is a need of implementation of new modus operandi or upgrades the existing technologies with the changing demands of the business requirement or to increase the organization’s profit opportunities. Change management is clearly defined as the structured processes that incorporate a set of organizational tools and equipment as well as effective adjustments to manage, provide guidance and lead the people in an organization to embrace with the process of change in order to achieve the targeted desired outcome of an organization and thus minimize the unavoidable productivity drops. This change management involves all levels …show more content…
Before addressing the change, managers must fully understand and analyse the situation first before jumping into conclusions. Moreover, managers must involve their subordinates in the process of change. The involvement of the employees is essential through open communication and discussions to ensure that they are conscious of the situation to achieve a mutual understanding. The next step is where the managers must proactively develop a plan to specify what is the targeted outcome of the intended change and to tackle the problems with correct measures. The planning is being implemented after everyone is aware of the change of plan and their role in making the change. However, managers need to provide support to their employees and always look out for them. In order to effectively and efficiently achieve the desired change, a change management of before, during and after need to clearly listed out and it is advisable to continue with the planning strategy even after the change has been implemented. When change is enforced, employers must always evaluate the progress. If the outcome reached the target and going smoothly, employees’ hard work and commitment must be acknowledged and appreciated by celebrating the success together. Nevertheless, if the end result is not up to the standard, managers have to look up for the problems and …show more content…
When the people in the organization are more open minded to change, they will not restrict themselves from trying something new or to learn new skills and technical knowledge. The organization will be more structured and can be realigned without hesitation. Therefore, the organization has the abilities to effectively deal when it comes to any changes that could lead to another direction. However, there are drawbacks that might happen during the process of change. One of the negative side would be the employees themselves or the stakeholders are resist to the change or not having a proper explanation from the managers caused them to circulate incorrect information about the change and thus hinder the completion of projects. Under those circumstances, if managers do not organize and plan the organizational change management accordingly, this would negatively affect the organization which causes the company out of business and customers. In conclusion, the rate of organizational change is increasing as change is needed for an organization to keep surviving and growing in this globalization era. Managers that possess good leadership and management skills such as able to vision better future of the company and workers, good planning strategies, provide better platform between employees and acknowledge their
Change can alter the normal routine of the workplace hence creating chaos. Organizational change can aid in improving the image of the organization, promoting efficiency and improve on the competitiveness of the organization (Schein, 2004). The manager can function as a trainer by helping the members of the organization to learn how to utilize the data to be used to promote development. He or she can help the members of n organization to acquire a new set of skills to help solve future problems of the organization.
The model that will be utilized to implement the change outlined within this paper is the Stetler Model. The model focuses on the nurse as the main critical thinker, but can be utilized by a group of clinicians. The model uses a systematic approach to bring about change through a five step process that involves the following: preparation, validation, comparative evaluation and decision-making, translation/application, and evaluation (Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick, 2013). This model focuses on defining the needs priority by way of evidence based research. Evidence is gathered externally via research and internally such as outcome data, consensus data, and experimental information (Schaffer, Sandau, and Diedrick, 2013).
My clearfit report was interestingly very true it was off by just a bit but overall it did represent me well. one of the parts that really resonated with me was coping with change. for most people change can be very difficult. An example where I had to deal with change in the workplace was I had a manager for 2 years who was very laid back and easygoing but one day I came in to work and we have new boss who is really strict and by the book. in order to keep my job and boss satisfied I had to cope with many changes in the workplace she was putting into effect.
Change is driven by the economy, social and environmental factors and most importantly the trend of business. According to The Society for Human Resource Management’s 2007 change Management Survey Report, 82 percent of Human Resource professionals reported the company planned and implement major organizational
Powered by Research paper on models of change management 1 Research paper on models of change management Shireesha Muthaluru Under the guidance of Prof. Antala atul Course Period:-01/13/2015 to 02/24/2015 Submission Date: 02/03/2015 Wilmington University Research paper on models of change management 2 Abstract The research paper presents importance of models change in change management and an alternative way of thinking about technological change in organizations. The Information technology is the process of planning, developing, implementing or managing computer or electronic based applications.
The change can be dynamic and effective. This change process must be viewed as an investment for the company. Lewin’s change Model is important ;because each employee must be ready to learn new things as well as unlearning old practices. Motivation is the most important part and difficult at times for changes to take effect. Employees are responsible for the company success.
This is because failure to involve them will lead to failure of the changes in the company. The managers in the company as well as the general workers will have to be involved in implementing the change in the firm. This will greatly facilitate the easy implementation of the change in the firm hence boost the performance of the company (Atkins & Lowe, 1994). The managers in the company are charged with the responsibility of managing the operations in the company hence involving them in the making the changes would help reduce resistance from them as well as facilitate the implementation of the change in the business firm. Communicating the change to the employees of the company will be very crucial as it will help reduce resistance from
1. How should organizational performance at Montefiore be measured? Montefiore should be measured by collecting data that reflects the currents trends and needs of the community in relation to the hospital (Knickman & Kovner, A., 2015).They may use metrics to evaluate patient satisfaction, the success of their heart, cancer, and Children’s Center. They may evaluate how the delivery system is performing in their organization. 2.
During the change process on my unit not all parts of that theory were fallow. First phase of process knowledge of problem was definitely recognize. The problem was pointed by DOH and research of topics were done. Next part – persuasion was not done due to very short period of time. The directors had only 24 hours to present a new polices to DOH and they did not have time to make any consultation or ask employees if change will be good.
Hence, leaders need to be prepared and manage readiness to the alteration by making an environment of honesty and transparency for their team as a successful implementation of the change is unlikely. Employees must be part of the change hence, they must to be told about the requirement of the change and be given a reward to motivate to embrace the change. If change be accepted by all recipients it can be implemented quickly and effectively. The leaders’ attitudes and behaviors have both positive and negative alterations on the change success. Therefore, leaders of organizations need to try and develop a more framing and shaping behavior, adding skills on themselves to change and motivate the subordinates towards the embracing the change.
Hence, the quality of communication is a critical aspect of successful change (Hayes, 2007). One form of effective communication strategy that PAT should adopt is “Underscore and Explore” which involves two-ways communication. This strategy allows managers to focus on the core issues related to the change. Employees are also given the opportunity to raise their concerns and feedbacks (Campitt, Dekoch and Cashman, 2000). Feedbacks in the form of surveys can be collected from the employees to improve in the change processes (Ford and Ford, 2010; Young and Post,
The post office was experiencing serious economic turmoil and overall poor performance and as a result, the change generators ventured into a process of change management. Change management according to Lewin's Change Management Model states “Change Management is a broad discipline that involves ensuring change is implemented smoothly and with lasting benefits, by considering its wider impact on the organization and people within it. Each change initiative you manage, or encounter will have its own unique set of objectives and activities, all of which must be coordinated.” This model is divided into three (03) phases unfreezing, changing, and freezing. In the case these phases were adapted as Generating change, Implementation and Adoption.
The program can proceed if all agents pivotal to the success of the change are engaged and a clear and concise vision for the future has been developed. Once the change model is in place, it is time to define the structure of change. Senior leaders should provide a clear path for communications and responsibility at each level. At this point I have realised that Change management is not an alternative to project management.
Thus, it is analysed that change is not hindrance to work progress and advancement. It is but an opportunity to exceed what is expected
In the Change Competence Model view, Connection is about combining the change vision and the change capacity in order to make them productive (Ten Have et al., 2015). To make a change successful, leaders should realize the importance of discussion and action, to direct the change process using their influence and power (Ten Have et al., 2015). During an episodic change, change agents have the role to give motivation and ensure psychological safety, considering active emotions of fear and anxiety (Weick & Quinn, 1999; Schein 1996). Trust and emotional involvement increases the chance of successful change processes (Ten Have et al., 2015). Strategic change benefits from systematic and methodic work which is guided by coordinator who has an