Prior to this assignment, I had once been to a courthouse; when I was called to serve for Jury Duty. Although I was not very excited about this, upon my arrival at the courthouse, I quickly to changed my perspective and was proud to be an American Citizen and be able to see my rights and have a voice in a case. Unfortunately, my luck did not go too far as I did not have to serve on the trial that day. Since then, I have been wondering what it truly is like to be sitting in a courtroom either as part of the jury or simply for observation. While in Boston, it was challenging for me to find a few hours during the week to go to court with my extremely busy schedule. Thus I decided that I would go to a Florida courthouse and get this experience …show more content…
I was extremely surprised as I walked into this courtroom to see the enormous difference with to the other courtroom I visited. This courtroom involved people that were in jail for 3rd degree felonies, cocaine possession, disappearing while in rehab, among other reasons. The first case I sat in to hear in this courtroom involved a 24-year-old lady that was being seen by a psychiatrist, and had committed a 3rd degree felony. Her attorney claimed that she had been in rehab for several months during her court dates and thus could not attend; however, the judge did not find this a legitimate reason and remanded her in custody. She had to sit and file some paperwork while her attorney planned their next step in order for her to be let free. When it was their second turn in front of the judge, her attorney was able to negotiate her original five-year prison sentence down to only six months. By accepting the plea, she was giving up several rights, including no trail and the chance to be deported. Once she asked the plea, the plaintiff attorney said there was DNA evidence making her responsible. The judge gave the defendant’s a 30-day appeal to legality. However, she had to check-in at least once a month with her attorney or the court so that they could keep track of her and ensure she was following her probation and had no need to go back to jail or court for a future
Albert W. Florence, the petitioner in this case, was initially arrested in 1998 and charged with use of a deadly weapon and obstruction of justice (Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders, Opinion, I). He pled guilty to two lesser counts and was ordered to make monthly payments to cover his fine. However, as stated in the Opinion of the Court, he did not keep up with his payments, and a warrant was issued for his arrest in 2003. Florence paid the rest of his fine only days later. However, when he and his wife were pulled over in Burlington County, New Jersey, in 2005, the state trooper’s computer system still had Florence’s warrant, so he arrested and transported him to Burlington County Detention Center.
Prior to the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, defendant Clarence Earl Gideon was charged with breaking and entering in the state of Florida. This crime is a felony according to Florida state law. Unable to pay for defense counsel, Gideon requested that the court grant him one for free. The court denied Gideon his request of being granted defense counsel. The court stated, “Under the laws of the State of Florida, the only time the Court can appoint Counsel to represent a Defendant is when that person charged with a capital offense.”
On October 14, 2015, I went to the Arizona Superior Court at Downtown Phoenix. I went to the room 503 in the Central Court Building, which is a family court. The judge that was in the room is Paul J McMurdie. He begin hearing at 1:30 P.M. and there are a 5 hearing during the day that I visited. One of the case that he hearing is FC2010-006759, Hall vs. Gollins.
I am Federal Chief Judge Merrick Garland. Democrats dream and Republicans dream come true. A very, very strong nominee for the Supreme Court of our beloved nation. I have earned honorable decades of experience on the bench and as a family man as well as an American citizen of this great nation of ours. Although the First Lady and I were born not too far of a distance, my ancestors like the Second Lady came here on planes.
More people get incarcerated for non-violent crimes and crimes caused by mental illnesses or drug abuse (Webb, 2009) and because these people get put in regular prisons, instead of in mental health facilities or facilities to help against drug addiction, where they could be treated to further prevent crimes driven by their illness (Webb, 2009), the prisons get overfilled and cannot hold the more ‘important’ prisoners that needed to be locked away from the public. A strong link of the criminal justice process is that the system tries to keep it fair for everyone. Every defendant has the right to an attorney so they can be defended properly and fairly and “Only judges who are adequately informed about a case can effectively control the proceedings and examine evidence” (Tochilovsky, 2002) It is also important for the criminal justice system that those involved show discretion and although this is not always the case, discretion by the judges, police, etc.
He appealed his conviction and sentence to the Fourth District Court of Appeal and they affirmed that the Act does not violate any constitutionality challenged the defendant. Facts 1. The defendant committed to serve time for certain crimes and he was prison released in August 1996. 2.
In 1999, a mental health court was established to therapeutically manage mentally ill people accused of a crime (King County TV, 2010). Unlike a conventional court system, a behavioral health court treats a mentally ill individual with more respect and understanding. According to King County TV (2010), mentally ill clients can propose to be placed in a mental health court system because it will allow them to have a chance to recover. However, when the client is not compliant with the plan of care given to them, he or she could be placed in jail if there is a possibility the
Originating in the Wisconsin Eastern U.S. District Court, the Supreme Court case of Gagnon v. Scarpelli (1973), involved a Wisconsin State Agency (Gagnon, Warden v. Scarpelli, n.d.). Later appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, this case was ruled in a liberal direction and concluded that the earlier decision is affirmed (Gagnon, Warden v. Scarpelli, n.d.). Case factors include violations of the Fourteenth Amendment right to due process and the need for counsel at a revocation hearing (Gagnon, Warden v. Scarpelli, n.d.). Moreover, in this case, the court held that parolees do have a limited right to counsel in revocation proceedings (Latessa & Smith, 2015). Furthermore, that the body must determine on a case-by-case basis whether counsel should be afforded, as counsel may not always be granted (Latessa & Smith, 2015).
On Sunday mornings, you wake up early and nothing is on television besides Judge Judy, Divorce Court, or Judge Mathis. The Judges are ruthless and do not seem to have sympathy for anyone. They often yell to boost the ratings of the show. This is merely just an exaggeration of how the court systems work. Judges don’t only have sympathy for the defendants that aren’t financially stable enough to pay for their lawsuit.
It was a very hot summer day. I remember one of the jurors talking about how it was a record breaking day. I was tired and a bit tense. I hated doing things in the heat. I mean, who would ever want to work in the heat, especially when a person’s life is at stake?
When the case involves a battered woman seeing all the violence done to her would be really painful. Just cannot see how someone could do it to someone they love The hardest part of being a jury member in a criminal case would be the sentencing to make the decision to put that criminal in prison. If the verdict is in prison for life or life without parole. This experience is going to stay with you from now on wondering if you did the right thing.
Personal Narrative My freshman year of high school, during basketball season, I injured my knee while playing in a home game versus Paola. I ended up tearing my acl and meniscus in my right knee, resulting in a surgery and a lot of therapy. I loved playing basketball and it was my favorite sport, but ever since I injured myself I haven’t felt the same way about the sport.
Another specialized court that a community might benefit from establishing is a mental health court. The aim of mental health courts is to connect people with mental illness, that display deviant behavior, to mental health resources and social services that can better deal with cases such as these as an option for individuals who need to be treated more than they need to be imprisoned (A Promising Alternative, 2011). One good reason to creating drug and mental health courts in a community is their goal to problem solve rather than just push defendants through the conveyor belt or revolving door
I learned that if one wants to observe court they must attend early in the morning. My first attempt to observe court was a failure. I leaned that court cases start early therefore, I needed to be there first thing in the morning. I also found that with each trip I made to the courthouse, it was filled
Are we obligated to obey unjust laws? Laws are important because they are guidelines for a state. Without laws citizens would not know how to act and cause harm to others. Laws are aimed at common good and keep a society together and functioning.