Gregory (2011) posits that according to 1984 National Organ Transplantation Act, there are about a hundred thousand of patients needing kidney transplant and only one-fifth
Consequently, the rise of selling organs on the black market has risen. It is set up by a broker who plans the surgery in a foreign country with the help of nurses and obviously the surgeon. This method of receiving a live organ illegally has caught the attention of many people who desperately wait years on the donors list for many reasons. According to MacKay’s research, a living kidney could possibly live up to twice as long as a cadaver kidney. Anxiously, people who live in extreme poverty await to sell a kidney for as little as one thousand dollars in hopes to ease their financial situations.
Not all patients can wait more than a year to get an organ transplant, and about 6200 people die each year waiting for their turn to come. In other words on average, 17 patients die each day waiting for an organ transplant. Every year on average, 38,700 people are being added to the United States’ organ transplant waiting list. Comparing this to the number of people receiving transplant every year, which is on average 24,800 patients, it would explain why many people die while waiting for their donor. The amount of donated organs has stayed rather constant over this few years but the number of patients needing organ transplant has been increasing significantly each year.
An exceedingly criticized phenomenon has been widely debated upon in different parts of the world. Kidney organ sale is the selling of one’s kidney primarily for financial provisions. It has been increasing since the demand for kidney for transplantation has escalated. It is seen as a practice with religious, ethical, political and practical issues. On the other hand, people who favor kidney organ sale see it as a beneficial and altruistic custom not only because of its monetary purposes but also because of its life saving intentions.
Patients on the waiting list are in end-stage organ failure and have been evaluated by a transplant physician at hospitals in the U.S. where organ transplants are performed. Policies that dictate organ allocation are created and revised through a consensus-building process that involves UNOS committees and a board of directors, all composed of transplant physicians, government officials, specialists in immunology and experts in organ donation, as well as donor families, transplant recipients and members of the general public. Specifics of waiting list rules vary by organ.² The time patients spend on the heart transplant waiting list can last anywhere from days to months, and in some cases years, depending on listing status. The availability of a donor with matching blood type and body size also affects the wait time.
During the previous decades, society’s behavior with regard to organ donation remains reluctant. A survey showed that although people plainly accept to offer their organs for transplantation, when a person dies, his or her relatives often refuse donation. To be able
Right now there are 115,429 people waiting for organs. We could be saving more lives then we are today by simply requiring organ donation. Although there are valid reasons people say no to it, but there are many more reasons to be a donor. Many people say no to organ donation because of the myths they hear.
Organ Donation, only two hundred one thousand, four hundred and fifty-nine people are registered at death since 1988 and only one hundred fifty-two thousand and ninety people were living donors since 1988. Compared to the amount of people who died with organs that are donatable, that 's not much and the amount of living donors compared to the amount of living people right now is three hundred twenty-five million, seven hundred sixty-two thousand, seven hundred and ten the amount of living donors is only 21.4190748899% of the population. It seems many people that can donate don’t know all the facts of organ donation. Even though some people believe stuff they view on television, television writers usually over exaggerate things. Despite advances in medicine and technology, and increased awareness of organ donation and transplantation, there continues to be a gap between supply and demand.
The text is directed toward medical personnel because it causes them to question, “what if”, organ sales legalized or what would they gain from this legalization? His article is also directed towards people in need of an organ, and organ donors. Gregory is successful when he uses logical, emotional and ethical tactics to persuade his audience on why organ sales would be beneficial. Some logical tactics Gregory uses to persuade his audience is giving the number of how many people die waiting for a transplant. He states, “...there are only about 20,000
There are nearly 100,000 people waiting patiently on organ transplant waiting lists, but sadly, on an average day, less than 80 people receive donor organs and approximately 19 die waiting for transplants. Even with
III. Purpose: To let readers know about the organ shortage situation Body I. Basic information about organ donation A. Definition of organ donation B. Graph Analysis: the disparity between the number of people in organ-waiting list and that of organ transplants
The life-saving aid of kidney organ sale is valuably perceived by people. C. The financial benefits given by kidney organ sale are sought after by those who need monetary provision. V. Survey on Selected Second Year Medical Technology Students of Silliman University Conclusion: This research paper has shown that although most respondents settled for the regulation of the sale and believed it to be altruistic; it is still impractical due to its high risks; unlawful due to its constitutional prohibitions; and unethical and irreligious due to the commodification and commercialization of the human
In 2006, about one year after Sally Satel received a kidney for a transplant, she wrote the article “Organs for Sale.” The article is very factual and filled with data and evidence to support all of Satel’s ideas. It is clear to the readers that Satel has spent an abundant amount of time researching information to support her concepts in the article. The article as a whole shows authority, accuracy, and is a well-written essay that is easy to understand and enjoyable to read. The article does lack objectivity due to bias, but Satel’s information and ideas are all supported and well explained which leads to a quality article.
Humans must have complete autonomy over their bodies. Their safety must be taken into serious consideration and the vulnerable and less fortunate ones must be protected from being duped into such an unethical crime that is stimulated by dishonest doctors and organ brokers. So, in order to achieve this safety level and hopefully put this illegal behavior at an end, I encourage all of you to take action and become organ donors. The supply of organs will increase legally; thus, the number of organs sold unethically in the Black Market will decrease. Tragic expressions such as “HER HEART IS MISSING” won’t be seen anymore in bold letters on the news or on newspapers’ first page.
The burden lies on those who oppose specific measures to increase the supply of organs to produce satisfactory arguments that favor their opinion. Supply of organs remains the most persistent problem in the field of organ transplantation. National Organ Transplantation Act, the leading legislation governing organ transplantation in the United States of America, established a national system for identification and equitable distribution of transplantable organs on the basis of medical need. Though it provides for explicit criteria, it remains necessary to evaluate each patient for suitability.
