ipl-logo

Peter The Great Confiscator Of Rights Essay

866 Words4 Pages

Usually whenever the situation of a brooding, strict power, ruling over a land and denying the freedom of its people is presented, the argument is that this ‘confiscator of rights’ is doing so out of necessity and has the best of the nation in mind. This entire concept can be and is frequently applied to the situation of Peter the Great. Peter, a Russian emperor, is usually attacked for his attempts at social reform and transforming Russian society into that of Western Europe, henceforth destroying the rights and freedom of the Russian people but, as many of his defenders would be quick to argue, it was done to better Russia; to modernize Russia and make it a better military power and in the end, done for the betterment of Russian society. However, the question must be asked, “Did Peter actually have the benefit of Russia on his mind with all these changes? And even if he did, do the positives of these reforms outweigh the negatives?” Well, to be clear, through the analysis of evidence in the form of documents, it’s clear that Peter more than likely did not usually have the betterment of Russia on his mind and even more clear that even if he did, it was greatly ineffective. …show more content…

Peter spent his days as a young man, mixed with foreigners in Russian and outside as he often travelled to Western Europe – spending a year mostly in England and Holland visiting shops, military fortifications, ship building facilities (working as a carpenter there) and any other institute which offer up knowledge about European technology and political and economic structures. From this point of view it’s not difficult to see why Peter was so obsessed with Western Europe; not only was he basically immersed in it during his early years but it caused could have even caused him to not be able to see how any country could be governed without Western European

Show More
Related
900 Words | 4 Pages

The doctor had said he would soon start to remember things and as soon as he did he remembered who he was and what moral dilemma he was facing. Soon enough he had his court hearing and his lawyers had a statement for him to read specifically so he would not go to jail and he would be able to go back to his life in Hollywood, and forget all the events that had happened. While facing the court, Peter had decided to not go through with his lawyers plan and he decided to take manners into his own hands. With that being said he had proven the court wrong and was free to go and to remain living his

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

How did the constitution guard against tyranny? In May 1787 55 individuals responded to the call for the constitutional convention. They were mostly wealthy and white males. Tyranny is the “accumulation of all powers in the same hands weather one, a few, or many.” This was written by James Madison.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Constitution DBQ What is tyranny and how do you guard against it? Tyranny is most often defined as harsh, absolute power in the hands of one individual - like a king or a dictator. The constitution was created May of 1787, in Philadelphia. “The accumulation of all powers … in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many (is) the very definition of tyranny.” It was made to replace the old constitution, the Articles of Confederation (Background Essay).

Read More
724 Words | 3 Pages

When Ivan V died in 1696, Peter was now the Sovereign of the entire Russian empire. He recognized that Russia was severely underdeveloped by the Renaissance-blessed Western Europe, and he aimed to revolutionize and modernize Russia under the guide of his West European advisors. Peter undertook mass reformation to help establish Russia as a great nation, rejecting the outdated medieval aristocracy in use at the time of his reign. Among these reforms, Peter formed a well armed navy and arranged his armies according to western military standards. He also secularized the Russian education system, and wrestled control over the Orthodox church.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

The primary difference between Peter and Ivan’s domestic policies was that Ivan focused on combatting potential enemies and Peter focused on modernizing and Westernizing Russia. Restrictions in Ivan’s Sudebnik and Peter’s Holy Synod made the Orthodox Church more subservient to the state. Ivan created prikazy to deal with specific areas of government, but, by Peter’s reign, the prikazy were ineffective, so Peter replaced them with Western-style colleges. Ivan also established the streltsy, a permanent military force, and the oprichnina, a secret police force, yet Peter expanded the Russian military and navy much more drastically.

Read More
1189 Words | 5 Pages

Peter the Great ruled Russia for many years as both Tsar and Emperor. He was known for his intense and crafty leadership where his political and social changes led to the modernization of Russia. At times Peter was a cruel leader and ordered executions of many followers and would execute men with his own bare hands. During his time in power Peter was considered “Peter the Great” by many followers. He was no doubt a great leader and ruler in Russia and wanted his supporters to earn a good education.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

This is apparent in the quote “ His Polish friends/ Always shook hands too violently, / I thought… Feliks Skrzynecki, / That formal address / I never got used to”. Peter was very critical and had a negative attitude about the fact that his father surrounded himself with Polish friends and did not attempt to meet Australians. Due to this, it provoked the barrier to aggravate which had detrimental impacts on the relationship between them due to them not being able to communicate properly. This stanza establishes that the only way he could feel a sense of belonging is to form relationships with other Polish people as he felt they related to each

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

The Hungarians battled with the Habsburgs for rule, as the Hungarians did not want to be placed under the rule of the dynasty. However, the two nations reached a compromise, and while Hungary was not fully controlled by the Habsburgs (Eastern European Powers), the Habsburgs still remained powerful absolute rulers in Austria. This shows that leaders struggled to gain absolute power and struggled to maintain absolute power, but leaders continued to strive for power in spite of that. In Russia, Peter the Great was able to gain power by spreading his influence to other areas of Eastern Europe. Resulting from the Great Northern War, Peter was able to gain Estonia and present-day Latvia, increasing his

Read More
766 Words | 4 Pages

Although he had many great ideas, Peter the Great was considered to be an alcoholic man with a short fuse. Physically, Peter the Great was not too appealing; he had strange convulsions that happened throughout his entire body (Bishop Burnet on Peter the Great). He was viewed by many to be mechanically inclined, but would better suffice as a carpenter rather than a ruler (Bishop Burnet on Peter the Great). Not only do I feel that he is not worthy of being labeled as an Absolutist, but that he was not physically or mentally stable enough to guide other people due to his alcoholism and hot temper. Although I do not visualize him as an Absolutist, I feel that he had the right idea of visiting other countries to compare to see what he could do for Russia to make it better for his people (Bishop Burnet on Peter the

Read More
674 Words | 3 Pages

Initially, Russia’s tsar, Ivan the Great, had seen Russia’s low literacy level and poor economic system dependent on peasant labor and began the revival of his mother country through expansion and reform. Unlike Western empires, Russia’s expansion had limited commercial expansion, though it did establish territorial and trading policies in central Asia. This expansion was caused by the movement of Russian peasants and landlords, adding new diversities to the country, making it a multicultural empire, like the Ottoman Empire. This expansion period reached a dramatic change with Russian Westernization led by one its chief reformist tsars, Peter the Great. Inspired by his travels, Peter the Great brought back many inventions of Western science and technology to shift Russia westward and created his capital, St. Petersburg.

Read More
928 Words | 4 Pages

“Tyranny is the accumulation of all power in the same hands, whether one, a few, or many.” Tyranny can manifest into a very strict government where the people of the country have no say in what goes on around them. The existing government in the United States under the articles of confederation just wasn’t working to protect against tyranny because it was too weak. In 1787, delegates representing twelve of the thirteen colonies came together to fix the government. How did the delegates write the Constitution to protect the United States from tyranny?

Read More
1752 Words | 8 Pages

When envisioned, many imagine America as the land of opportunity and freedom. However, America isn't all that it's cracked up to be. Most people are barely skating by, some are well off and thriving, but very few have wealth and riches. Living with the economics of America, Americans bond each other in circumstances that are not beneficial so that they may stay or remain at the top and watch when others are trampled over as if their hands are tied. America has many faults as its history is filled with events that display exploitation of its citizens and others around them.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

Also, during this time period, Frederick William I transformed Prussia into a military state. To become an absolute ruler, Peter the Great made many reforms throughout Russia. However, all these absolute leaders had the same goal. Even though they reigned over different countries, they all strengthened their armies, raised taxes, and unified religion. One thing that all absolute rulers did was increase the strength of their army.

Read More
380 Words | 2 Pages

Peter even threatened his father when he didn’t get his way, he yelled, “I don’t think you’d better consider it anymore”(Bradbury 7), as if he were to do something about it. Peter doesn’t show his admiration towards his parents, gestures such as not making eye contact and threatening his own parents are signs of no regards due to Peter’s disrespect. In addition, Peter is also

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Peter the Great and Louis XIV were both the greatest rulers of their times. Both of them were autocrats having unlimited power and on the contrary both of them were absolutists. Louis XIV was the ruler of France and nicknamed “The Sun King” and Peter the Great was the ruler of Russia. Although Peter the Great and Louis XIV has some different successes, they had several noticeable similarities such as power, buildings, and armies/economical growths. Peter the Great and Louis XIV had similar successes in their famous buildings.

Read More

More about Peter The Great Confiscator Of Rights Essay

Related Topics

Open Document