Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
The Dakota Access pipeline is a 1,175 mile oil pipe that pumps crude oil from the Bakken Three Forks oil reserves in North Dakota. The proposed route of the pipe traverses from The Dakotas through Iowa to refineries in Illinois. In the Dakotas the pipeline is a large controversy, with large groups of protesters violently clashing with local law enforcement. Native Americans from around the nation have come as protesters to help conserve the rights and freedom of their people on the reservation. The Dakota Access Pipeline should not be built because the oil industry is stealing from the local economy and the risk of an oil spill destroying the environment and culture of the area is not worth the reward.
Pipelines may be an easy way to transport oil but, pipes regularly
…show more content…
This 470,000 barrels of oil a day could be refined locally increasing jobs and income at the local scale. According to Energy Transfer The Dakota Access, LLC (commonly referred to as “DAPL” or “Dakota Access”) is a company of Energy Transfer Partners formed to safely and reliably transport American crude oil from the Bakken/Three Forks sites in North Dakota to markets and refineries located in the Midwest, East Coast and Gulf Coast regions of the United States. The local economy in North Dakota will not benefit from their oil being transported to large refineries across the U.S. Then, once moved the oil is refined and sold by large oil companies like DAPL in and out of the U.S. This means the pipeline will support large industry and steal resources of high value from the local
Should The United States Drill For Alaska Dbq Essay
722 Words | 3 PagesFor centuries the United States has been a beacon of hope for environmentalism, and it is imperative for our country that we preserve this identity. The Arctic National Wildlife Refuge or ANWR is in the secluded northeastern corner of Alaska and could contain large reserves of oil in the Prudhoe Bay region. The question of whether or not to drill for oil has been a controversial topic in American politics for decades, though the evidence will show that drilling for oil is a mistake for this country. This is because it will devastate and destroy the fragile environment. Additionally, drilling in Prudhoe Bay will not solve our oil problems.
Pros And Cons Of Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline
1618 Words | 7 PagesCanada should not allow The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline to go through as it poses to many environmental and ecological risks. Pristine areas across central and northern BC, including the Great Bear Rainforest, are under threat if the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline is put into service. In the end, the concerns over the BC pipeline outweigh the possible benefits the pipeline may result in. The Canadian oil and gas company Enbridge, proposed the Northern Gateway project as a solution to transport 525,000 barrels of crude oil per day.
Summary Of A High-Plains Showdown Over The Dakota Access Pipeline
466 Words | 2 PagesThe Time article “A High-Plains Showdown Over the Dakota Access Pipeline” by Justin Worland talks about a controversy over a 1,200-mile pipeline stretching from North Dakota to Illinois. The pipeline is called the Dakota Access Pipeline project and is being built by the Energy Transfer Partners company. Some people are outraged by the pipeline because it contributes to man-made climate change. Others are mainly outraged because the Standing Rock Sioux tribe never agreed to the construction of the pipeline. The leaders of the tribe say that “Washington never considered their concerns, as required by the federal law” (Worland).
The Pros And Cons Of North Dakota Access Pipeline
573 Words | 3 PagesDespite Donald Trump being elected for president this year, one of his negative intentions was to reopen the project in North Dakota. Unfortunately, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has been granted to complete Dakota Access Pipeline despite the protest of environmentalist and Native Americans. The ideology of North Dakota Access Pipeline is it would become an “economic boon”, and would employ of thousands of jobs. The pipeline shall stretch 1,172 miles through four states such as North Dakota, South Dakota, Iowa, and southern Illinois. Too keep in mind, 470,000 barrels of crude oil would be moved within one day.
The Pros And Cons Of The Enbridge Pipeline
84 Words | 1 PagesAs The Assembly of The First Nations Regional Chief for British Columbia, I say that the Enbridge Pipeline is a risk to the environment, the ecosystems, the health and the safety to the First Nations and the citizens of British Columbia. We First Nations have had 21,000 people sign off on the online petition “hold the wall”. The pipeline route will interfere homes of where six First Nations live and their willing to put their lives on hold to fight against the Enbridge Pipeline.
The Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
1059 Words | 5 PagesThe Dakota Access Pipeline is a line to carry oil from an oil-rich area in North Dakota to the final destination in Illinois. This pipeline goes directly through culturally important areas in the Sioux Indian Reservation. Many people have protested against the project, but the Army Corps of Engineers keep giving it the go-ahead (Ellis). The Dakota Access Pipeline is an issue that is negatively affecting Native Americans. This project
Keystone Pipeline Project Research Paper
2089 Words | 9 PagesThe environmental argument is coming from a clash over the fact they are basically stripping the canadian boreal forest, the path of the pipeline extends across major aquifers, and pipelines tend to leak and destroy surrounding environments. In addition ccording to The Center for Climate and Energy Solutions State, “epartment’s draft SEIS found that oil from the Canadian oil sands is 17 percent more carbon-intensive than the average oil consumed in the United States... It is estimated that the U.S. greenhouse gas footprint would increase by 3 million to 21 million metric tons per year, or around 0.04 percent to 0.3 percent of the 2010 levels, if Keystone is built. Fortunately on November 6, 2015, President Barack Obama’s administration rejected the Keystone Pipeline XL after 7 years of dispute. As mentioned in the Wall Street Journal, Obama stated “the project would not have lowered gas prices, improved energy security or made a meaningful long-term contribution to the economy
Annotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline
903 Words | 4 PagesPresident Obama. After interviewing with aNebraska news reporter, President Obama addressed that adding the pipeline will accommodate Unites State economy and will produce thousands of jobs, but the health and safety of the American people comes first. No need to build the pipeline that will be a danger to American citizens. The Pipeline will go through the Ogallala aquifer, which supplies one forth of drinking water key sources in Nebraska and the Midwest. Nebraska residents also supports the president and they will choose their children’s safety over a few jobs added if it will harm their kids by drinking potentially hazardous water that would damage their
Dakota Pipeline Research Paper
347 Words | 2 PagesPipelines are also proven to be the safest method of transferring crude oil,
The Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
868 Words | 4 PagesIt’s important for the United States to produce and export oil because if we don’t, the Middle East and Russia will capitalize on the product and they will become stronger and richer countries. One of the ways that the United States can be an economically strong country is to reopen the Keystone pipeline and also allow states to have the power to generate their own oil. The opposition believes that pipelines have posed a huge risk to wildlife and the surrounding environment. The Key Stone pipeline has too many hurdles to go through; therefore, wildlife activists are against this project.
Native American Pipeline Pros And Cons
533 Words | 3 Pagesless damage in the pipeline can cause the environment to be clean and to allow the people not to be worried and to think that the pipe can transport the crude oil
Dakota Access Pipeline Benefits
812 Words | 4 Pages“Benefits of Governmental Compromise Regarding the Dakota Access Pipeline” Nations all have unique governments and differences necessary for demonstrating successful leadership. Every country needs different assistance from their leadership, such as Rio requiring infrastructure or Somalia lacking political power. Some governments concern themselves with their politicians’ well-being more so than the people they lead, which creates a relevant problem in America. The United States Government can easily forget about Native American Reservations, or even ignore the people living on them. Recently, the United States Army Corps of Engineers has worked on the Dakota Access Pipeline project, which would cross over Native American ancestral lands,
Keystone XL Pipeline Research Paper
628 Words | 3 PagesControversy Surrounding the Keystone XL Pipeline To build or not to build, this choice will impact the relationship between the US and Canada and determine the level of dependence the US will have on countries that are not so friendly. “TransCanada’s proposed Keystone XL Pipeline would transport oil sands crude from Canada and shale oil produced in North Dakota and Montana to a market hub in Nebraska for delivery to Gulf Coast refineries. The pipeline would consist of 875 miles of 36-inch pipe with the capacity to transport 830,000 barrels per day” (Parfomak, Pirog, Luther and Vann 4). The construction of the Keystone XL Pipeline would strengthen the United States economy, provide energy security and have minimal environmental impact. “The Keystone XL project would create $1.1 trillion in private capital investment at no
The Pros And Cons Of Trans Alaska Pipeline
1214 Words | 5 PagesTAPS transports 17% of the United State’s domestic petroleum. If the pipeline were to stop, “A loss of that production would increase prices by at least 10 to 16 percent” (Balan). This is very important, as the majority of the American population is in constant need of these resources. A shift this dramatic in the economy would lead to outrage and possible changes in economic inflation. All in all, the Trans Alaska pipeline has provided for a great number of people and has not failed to let them down.
Fracking Argumentative Essay
792 Words | 4 PagesFor the citizens, “fracking will give them jobs so they can make money and support their families” (Rogowsky). Furthermore, with the addition of fracking “the United States can get about 1.8 trillion barrels of shale (“sedimentary rocks that have rich sources of petroleum and natural gas” (Rogowsky)) a year compared to Saudi
More about Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
Should The United States Drill For Alaska Dbq Essay
722 Words | 3 PagesPros And Cons Of Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline
1618 Words | 7 PagesSummary Of A High-Plains Showdown Over The Dakota Access Pipeline
466 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of North Dakota Access Pipeline
573 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Enbridge Pipeline
84 Words | 1 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Dakota Access Pipeline
1059 Words | 5 PagesKeystone Pipeline Project Research Paper
2089 Words | 9 PagesAnnotated Bibliography On Keystone Pipeline
903 Words | 4 PagesDakota Pipeline Research Paper
347 Words | 2 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of The Keystone Pipeline
868 Words | 4 PagesNative American Pipeline Pros And Cons
533 Words | 3 PagesDakota Access Pipeline Benefits
812 Words | 4 PagesKeystone XL Pipeline Research Paper
628 Words | 3 PagesThe Pros And Cons Of Trans Alaska Pipeline
1214 Words | 5 PagesFracking Argumentative Essay
792 Words | 4 Pages