Pros And Cons Of Zoos

Did you know the animals are not locked up in cages in lots of zoos? Also did you know children and adults alike can learn to appreciate animals in zoos. I am pro zoo only because I believe zoos take very good care of the animals and can help animals live longer. The focus of this paragraph is there are many natural habitats in the zoos, zoos provide entertainment, and zoos help animals maintain a healthy population. There are many natural habitats in the zoos.

For example the San Diego Zoo researchers are working to preserve living cell samples from animals. Hoping that one day they will have the technology to turn cells into full animals, which could allow scientists to restore endangered species. So zoos have had the choice how to save endangered species, ones what are quicker or ones what are not possible to do right now. No one is born to be prisoner.

Growing up I had my own idea of what a zoo was, a place like the Fort Wayne Children’s Zoo full of beautiful animals and dedicated to education, research, and conservation. After persistent research I have come to find that not all zoos are the same. Zoos can range from nationally ranked research facilities to makeshift “monkey-shows” dedicated to profit. The debate of whether zoos are ethical can be easily split between animal rights activists and zoo advocates. Animal rights activists argue that it is inhumane to house animals in inadequate habitats and are upset that many species that aren’t considered endangered are being held in zoos around the world.

If zoos ignore the standards and regulations that are given to them, they will be shut down (? List of Pros and Cons of Zoos?). Today I tried to persuade you to believe that zoos are beneficial to animals and people. Zoos are helpful to animals in many ways and are also a safe place for animals to live their lives. Now that you know how animals are benefitted in zoos, maybe you will begin to realize how fortunate animals really are to be in

Introduction An issue that is hotly debated is whether zoos are ethical. Some people think that zoos should not exist, but research shows that zoos are ethical. Zoos give people an opportunity to observe animals that they would not usually see(“Zoo facts and worksheets”). Zoos are proven to be good for many reasons. Zoos are ethical because they provide their animals with a good life, they can save animals, and they are a good place to visit to.

In the wild, these animals might have trouble finding mates and breeding. Journey North Article says “When a population drops dangerously, captive breeding can boost numbers. Captive produced young can sometimes be released into the wild where populations have diminished or disappeared, yet where suitable habitat remains to support them. For example, the very low numbers of wild Whooping Cranes caused biologists to try safeguarding the species through captive breeding.” This shows that captive breeding programs can benefit animals by increasing the population of endangered animals.

Although the sources have similar evidence, they still have different ways. In “The Zoos Go Wild” instead of the author talking about being safe and protected there was a different idea. According to the Nirgiotis “Willie’s keepers wanted him to be happy” (Nirgiotis, pg. 3). None of the other stories showed this type of evidence.

This usually causes extinction within that species, and researchers have decided to do something about it. Although endangered animals are born in the wild, they should be sheltered and protected in nature parks because it helps decrease the amount of extinctions, allows a better and healthier environment, and the animals are protected from predators and human hunters. Endangered animals are to be kept in zoos because it decreases the amount of extinctions. Human activities have affected animals living in the wild dramatically throughout history. Roads being built and

In the United States, animals are kept in zoos. Animals are kept in cages for many reasons. One of the reasons animals are kept in zoos are for safety and to educate people on the dangerous of animal attacks. Another reason is for economic reason where people go and pay money to see certain animals at the zoo.

I thought it was great that they have these programs to help the inmates. I think programs are crucial so that the inmates can be rehabilitated into society and also these people don’t revert back to jail again. Jail activities are important so when they go out, they can be functioning members of society and learn to work with one another. Going into the whole situation I felt weird about touring the jail because I thought it will make the inmates feel uncomfortable. Also, it reminded me of inmates assuming the position of ‘zoo animals’ and I didn 't like that.

At the Indianapolis Zoo we empower our guests. We share with them not only what needs their help but how they can help by implementing small changes that they can incorporate into their daily lives. I have a unique role in animal conservation by being that link between our guests and the incredible animals in our collection. I strive to make sure that each interaction I have with visitors creates that ‘wow’ moment that inspires them to care about the natural world in and out of the Midwest. A daily goal of mine is to take the extra time to talk to our guests about our animals and share with them the plight of the oceans and how we are all connected to that environment even though it is out of sight.

The purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast two article. The articles are “Zoos: Myth and Reality” by Rob Laidlaw and “ Zoos Connect Us to the Natural world” by Michael Hutchins. In Mr Laidlaw's article he believes that animals in zoos are mistreated and do not live up to the propaganda. In Mr Hutchins he believes that zoos are a good place for kids to learn and see exotic animals that you would not be able to see in your everyday lives. Laidlaw believes that the owner of the zoo do not live up to their own word.

Alienation from Nature The alienation of nature describes a dissociation between nonhumans and nature caused by humans. Jonathan Safran Foer, a recently converted vegetarian, described in his book “Eating Animals” the horrific consequences of factory farming and the divide between humans and nature. The customers, butchers, and factory farmers have three very disparate disconnections with the animals slaughtered. Factory farm owners replace these naturally occurring organisms with selected mutants.