Resilience in managerial life is worth looking in to as managers need to be more resilient so that they can bounce back from the loads of pressures and adversities encounter in business. In this context, there is a need to understand the resilient ability of a manager against his personality traits and thinking pattern. With this assumption, a research is designed to examine the relationship of personality dispositions, cognitive style and decision making style with resilience of management students. A sample of 130 management students was selected randomly between the age group of 20-25 years. The tests used are Resilience Inventory, Myers Briggs Type Indicator, Cognitive Style Inventory and Decision Making Inventory. Results showed that resilience …show more content…
A child who generally receives positive reinforcing images of himself as they are reflected in the loving gestures of his primary caregivers soon begins to associate these reflected subliminal messages with his own state of being in the world. In troubled families, however, the mirroring process goes awry and children are at risk of forming an inner self-representation that feels defective and unwanted (Swinney, 2001). Though, developmental theory maintains that occasionally a child will manage to distract himself from distorted images and will be drawn instead to more positively reinforcing image of himself in relation to his environment. Piaget’s (1952) one of the stimulus equilibration is the most useful information processing concept. It refers to the overall balancing-act that occurs between existing frames of reference and novel experiences, ideally leading to a sense of coherent equilibrium between the child's subjective inner and objective outer world. This would predict resilient life coping skills from a child possessing an innately adaptive, harmoniously balanced internal frame of reference (Siegler, …show more content…
Ego psychology conceptualizes the intrapsychic world as one of tension between the energy dynamics of the unconscious demands of the "superego," the conscious volition of the "ego," and the instinctual drives of the "id." This conflict produces anxiety, which brings forth a compromise between the needs of the id and the ego in the form of a defense mechanism such as repression, suppression, denial or projection of the true facts of the situation to a place in the psyche where they no longer have to be consciously dealt with. However, object relations theory views this conflict as being generated more within the context of relationships with others rather than strictly within oneself. Self psychology, on the other hand, focuses more on how the external relationships in one's life help in develop and maintain a sense of self-esteem and self-cohesion through interaction with one's inner relationship with oneself. It is more of a "two person, self-object" psychology.
In sum, psychodynamic theories have emphasized the importance of ego psychology, object relation and self psychology, the predominant factors they have emphasized is on individuals’ personal disposition that helps them in maintaining resilience. Similarly, cognitive theories have explained the concept of experiential
Resilience is the capacity to recover quickly from a traumatic experience. Eric Greiten writes,“To move through pain to wisdom, through fear to courage. Through suffering to strength requires resilience” (Eric Greiten 8). Whether the way a person express resilience is positive or negative, resilience acknowledges a person’s ability and pace to overcome the troublesome occurrences in life. In the book Unbroken, written by Laura Hillenbrand, the character Louis Zamperini deals with resilience by showing courage, and forgiveness.
A factor that potentially contributes to this phenomenon is that resilience that inherently develops
“Even if someone has already experienced more trauma than they can handle, there is still a chance to build resilience and come back to a more balanced state”. ("Trauma and Resilience”) With the technology and medicine etc nowadays all of us will have different resilience than people of many different ages. That's why I think you are born with some resilience but you also have to adapt and learn different ways to be
Through observation of the microsystems and the interactions these had with the individual, either McCandless or Russo at the center, offers insight to what impacted such different developmental outcomes. By comparing the resiliency of the two, it is apparent that Chris McCandless was less resilient than Richard Russo. To be considered resilient an individual is able to “adapt well—emotionally, socially, and behaviorally” despite the stress and vulnerability the individual experiences (Broekman, 2011). Early experience is the most crucial time period to influence resilience because it is a period of heightened sensitivity to environmental factors that can later on develop to become mental disorders.
One of Freud’s theories is that the “Id – Ego combination dominates a person’s behavior until social awareness leads to the emergence of the superego, which recognizes that
What does resilience really mean to you? The literal definition to resilience is the ability to cope with problems and setbacks. In the story Unbroken by Laura Hillenbrand, she shows us all different kind of ways that the characters in her story used the skills that Kendra Cherry was talking about, to help them out of every situation. In this story it shows how certain situations affect people in different ways and how each person goes through seven skills. The characteristic that Louie undergoes is the skill of Strong Problem-Solving.
(Fonagy et al., 2004). The two objects in this framework i.e. self and others, mentalize interactively. While imagining one’s own thoughts and feelings, one determines one’s idea of what is in other’s mind and vice
“During my first experiment [of creating the monster], a kind of enthusiastic frenzy had blinded me to the horror of my employment, my mind was intently fixed on the sequel of my labour, and my eyes were shut to the horror of my proceedings” (Shelly, 2017, p.138). With these words, Victor Frankenstein in Mary Shelly’s Frankenstein explains to Robert Walton that his unconscious mind (which is influenced by an enthusiastic frenzy) absents his conscious mind from recognizing the severe consequences of his attempt to give a life to the inanimate body. The question poses here is; to what extent does his unconscious mind affect his choices and his relationships with the other characters in the story.
THEORIES OF INTELLIGENCE INTRODUCTION Throughout history, numerous researchers have suggested different definitions regarding intelligence and that it is a single, general ability, while other researchers believed that the definition of intelligence includes a range of skills. Spearman (general intelligence), Gardner (multiple intelligence) and Goleman (emotional intelligence) have all looked into further research regarding intelligence, where 3 different theories were formed regarding what intelligence is and how it should be defined. Since then, Binet, Simon and Terman have all contributed to intelligence testing. Although, there is still controversy over intelligence testing.
Resilience as a developmental attribute seems necessary for teachers to be more confident and successful in their teaching. More
Hardy, Concato & Gill (2004) stated that resilient people are those who display “the capacity to remain well, recover, or even thrive in face of adversity”. Masten (2001) as mentioned that they are the ordinary person dealing with the challenges and tragedies of everyday real life. For instance, the response of many Americans to the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks and individuals’ efforts to rebuild their lives shows their resiliency. Being resilient does not mean that a person does not have or had experience difficulty or distress; the emotional pain and sadness are common but the path to resilience is likely to involve considerable emotional distress. Resilience is not a trait which people either has or do not have whereas it involves
Furthermore, these contextual patterns are underpinned by belief system, ideology and language ( Bronfenbrenner , Blum ). Hence the resilience paradigm focuses on strength based intervention and takes one away from deficit oriented practice. Building on my professional practice , incorporating the HEADSS assessment form facilitated the process of determining the risk and protective factors of my clients. As mentioned in my previous post I did not take any formal assessments during my counselling sessions in the past.
It is an ordinary process for humans to cope up with “demonstrable risks” (Masten, 2001) i.e. threats that have noticeably brought unwanted issues in one’s life. Resilience can be defined on two foundations; risks and positive adaptation. It is a quality of a person to accommodate with unfavorable alterations in life derived as a result of exposure to risks such as financial crisis, divorce, health problems or disaster. Therefore, resilience cannot exist in absence of risks.
For example, animal experimentations conceptualized stress as a physiological drive that is triggered by negative environmental stimuli. As such, coping behaviors were seen as acts of controlling how we respond to these negative stimuli. On the other hand, psychoanalytic ego psychology presented a trait and style approach to coping. In this perspective, the traits and characteristics that individuals possess will determine how they react to particular types of stimuli. However, there are limitations to this approach.
In 1991 Norman Garmezy developed a theoretical framework for resiliency. Garmezy (1991) proposed three types of protective factors that make up his theoretical framework, which includes individual characteristics of the individual, a close-knit relationship with the family and lastly, social support and structure outside their immediate family. The primary factor in developing resiliency relates to the person's intelligence and character, and Garmezy (1991) states that resilient youth have above average intelligence. Garmezy (1991) defines the second factor in developing resiliency as one that includes the support of family to help with difficult conditions. The third common factor of resilient youth is external support from institutions (Garmezy, 1991).