College athletics is a core part of society, especially the colleges. Colleges themselves make a lot of money off of their college athletes, however, they do not treat them with the same respect. College athletes face terrible obstacles in their life balancing both their athletics and academic life. These problems lead to the debate over whether or not college athletes should be paid, to lessen the burden of college life. Throughout time, there has been an ongoing debate about whether or not college athletes should be paid to play. Many people, including the general community or fans of the college, believe that college athletes provide so much for colleges in terms of money that the athletes deserve respect and money. Others argue that college …show more content…
For the athletes, the money made from their sport would allow increased concentration on their studies due to less focus on tuition and living costs. As statistics have previously shown about the minimal chances of ever going pro as an athlete, a salary would make the time the college athletes spent on their sport worthwhile, and they can also have a higher chance of being better off financially post college. If their time as a college athlete is made valuable, it will also increase motivation and potential to further hone their skills to perform better in their sport. Though giving college athletes a salary would be exceptionally beneficial for them, it also has negative aspects as well, pertaining to the colleges’ perspective about it. One major argument made against college athletes salaries is that if they get paid, then they would become regular employees, and are then subject to being laid off. In his March Madness interview, Mark Emmert, the head of the NCAA, states how it would be “utterly unacceptable…to convert students into employees” (PBS). There would also be little to no difference between college and professional sports, and would fail to preserve the “amateurism”, as valued by the NCAA. Emmert justified this principle by claiming that “college athletes can’t be paid for their labor or commercial use of their names, images…because such pay would be exploitative” (O’Bannon). This arbitrary line between how college athletes are paid compared to their coaches and their performance on the field does little to fully explain to the extent to which college athletes cannot profit off anything during their college careers. While college athletes receive virtually little to no compensation for their contributions to their sports, their coaches can make up to an average of $1.75 million dollars. Additionally, the NCAA that regulates the rules, standards, and
Why College Athletes should not get Paid Wouldn't you want your college to be a fair place? College athletes are not paid because fans could lose interest if the players had been expert athletes. Paying all college athletes involves a number of tough enterprises and money, so for universities to be an awesome and fair region for all students colleges generally choose to now not to pay college athletes. College athletes need to know not to be paid because these athletes chose to be athletes, and also no one has sufficient money to pay everyone, so there could now not be any equality, however, some argue that athletes spend all their time and don’t get what they deserve returned. Different programs within the college could be erased if college athletes receive a commission consistent with maryville.edu “athletes will diminish the spirit of amateurism” this means that if students get a possibility to receive a commission at college they may never need to pick some other class which can have an effect on their future.
With the revenue quickly escalating, college athletes appear more as employees because of the money they are generating for their school program (Berry III,
College sports are a multibillion-dollar industry that brings millions of fans in to watch their favorite teams or athletes play. Collegiate sports have always played a significant role in the U.S., and the debate as to whether college athletes should be paid or not has been ongoing for years. While many people believe that athletes should be paid for their hard work, as well as the significant amount of money they bring into the schools, many people also believe that they should not be paid. Although college athletes work hard, paying college athletes could lead to many negative consequences in the sport such as budget cuts in smaller income sports, athletes only playing for the money, and takes away the difference between amateur and professional athletes. Paying college athletes could lead to budget cuts in other sports or activities that don’t bring in as much money.
“Should College Athletes get Paid” Imagine what it is like being a college athlete. The mornings most likely consist of waking up early to some type of practice. After morning practice and workouts, classes begin. Usually along with the classes comes labs and tutoring for those that may need some remedial help, Then, once classes are done for the day, it is back to practice that probably would not end until late that night. The process starts all over again the next day.
Leo Kaplan Ms. Skemp-Cook Academic Writing 8 May 2023 The Case For Paying College Athletes College athletes are not receiving the respect they deserve. They work day after day putting in the effort to contend for division championships and earn their team money but in the process, they are not being compensated in return. With schools collecting tons of revenue every year, college programs should have no problem paying athletes. For example, the Department of Education has stated that in 2019, college athletic programs earned $14 billion, which was a major increase from $4 billion in 2003 (Drozdowski).
As the NCAA revenue continues to climb, pressure to pay student athletes is growing(“Why college athletes deserve compensation” 1).Former NFL player Michael Bennett told ESPN, “Heck yeah college athletes should be paid(Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2).He says “NCAA gets paid, Rose Bowl gets paid, everybody gets paid except the people making the product(“Reasons Why Student Athletes Should Be Paid” 2). There is an extreme amount of attention brought to curtain sports around the world, and that is Football, and Basketball(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 1). These sports alone generate Billions of dollars every year for just such a short period of time, and this revenue that is being brought in from not only these two sports, but the other sports that other 4-year universities may have, is not being used in the right ways(“Why College Athletes Should Be Compensated” 2). The money that is being brought in every year seems to never find the student
In the article, “The Billion Dollar Industry that Has Never Paid its Money-Makers: The NCAA’s Attempt at Compensation Through Names, Images and Likeness” by law school graduate from Pennsylvania State University and Touro College, Christopher Palmieri, touches on the resemblance of student-athletes to professional athletes. He states, “Apparel deals, ticket sales, and school reputations have made it so that some college games have over one billion dollars at play when student-athletes gear up. Despite this, the NCAA still prevented all college athletes from making a single cent from their own popularity without facing serious repercussions. … The plaintiffs argue that it is unjust for the universities, apparel companies, and many others to profit from the hard work of these athletes without allowing them to earn money for themselves” (Palmieri 1607). These athletes give up so much of their time and work so hard, both physically and mentally, to only be rewarded with cheers and praises.
Over time, college sports evolved into a multi-billion dollar industry, with universities and the NCAA reaping significant financial gains from ticket sales, sponsorships, and merchandise. Despite this, student athletes are still considered amateur participants, with the NCAA maintaining strict rules against paying athletes for their participation. This has led to a growing movement advocating for the recognition of student athletes as employees, as they are essential to the success of college sports. The legal and ethical arguments surrounding the employee status of student athletes are complex and
In fact, only seven percent of high school athletes continue their athletic careers into college. There are many reasons for this like choosing a different career path, not wanting to risk injury, or simply because there is no guarantee. If there were a system in place that allowed those same athletes to get paid for their contributions, then many more would continue. The pay doesn’t necessarily need to be groundbreaking or on the same level as professional athletes by any means, just something reasonable to cover everyday expenses. This would also increase the level of competition currently being played by being able to include incentives based on performance.
Paying athletes would lead to a better education for them because they would worry less about trying to survive without an actual job. It would also allow the athletes the ability to go on vacations if they received a monthly stipend. This is necessary for student-athletes because they have the constant stress of trying to become better than their opponents. Scholarships alone are not sufficient to support student-athletes, so they need to receive an actual pay to account for the time they
Rather it focuses on playing for money, which is not ethical. Money is important but ultimately these individuals are there to play a sport and gain an education, not to become rich. These individuals are not employees and paying them would then eliminate many people playing for the right reasons, because they love the game. An article published talking about how much the sports industry has changed over the years says, “Some fans say college athletics are more interesting to watch because the athletes play purely for the pride of their school and hopes of some day being signed to a professional organization” (Jones, 2012). These athletes make watching college sports more interesting because they are not there for the money, and quite frankly should not be there solely for the
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
That is a big reason they should get paid; paying them turns them into "employees." Eventually, turning everything into a money battle, causing the student-athletes to lose their love for the game. "Paying student-athletes would turn them into professionals… student-athletes are students first…attending college to receive an education and secondary to compete in their sport" (Drozdowski). Turning them into "employees" would shift their focus from their education which is the most important thing. According to the NCAA, fewer than 2 percent of student-athletes go pro, which results in about 98 percent of student-athletes leaving college and going into the world getting a 9-5 job.
College sports is one of the best-known entertainments around the world. But for the athletes, they are students first then athletes second. For college student-athletes, there are a variety of scholarships and grants to help pay for college or college debt. However, some critics say that student-athletes should be paid a salary like pro athletes would, with help from scholarships or grants. The authors of, College Athletes are being Educated, not Exploited, Val Ackerman and Larry Scott, argue that student-athletes are already paid by free education and other necessities.
More than half of student-athletes already get financial aid as well, and a good majority of them don’t even need it. If athletes began receiving salaries on top of what they already get, the regular price of college tuition could skyrocket (Wood). In the end, these student-athletes already are gaining tens of thousands of dollars during their college careers along with having the chance at getting a college education. This sounds like plenty enough of earning opportunities for a