The differences between the Shark Tank clip and the slave auction clip are obvious, although there are also some similarities. While both clips demonstrate examples of capitalism, each show it in a different perspective.
For example, social classes are demonstrated in both clips quite clearly. In the first clip the slaves represent the lower/working class, the auctioneer acts as the middle class, and the interested buyer is of course the upperclassman. The working class is represented in the second video by Johnny, a farmer (although the middle class could also be represented by Johnny and his buyers), and the upper class would be demonstrated by the rich and powerful “sharks.” The fact that both videos highlight these different levels of power within their activities strengthens the element of capitalism in each. This is one of the main reasons that capitalism seems to be a strong component in each of these video clips, although there are some other facets that
…show more content…
In the first, the slave buyer needs slaves to help him grow, harvest, and ultimately sell some sort of cash crop such as tobacco, in exchange for pay. Therefore, he went to the auctioneer to buy slaves. By buying a slave (or multiple as the case may be) he is paying the auctioneer, who then has gained a profit.
This process of exchanging money, acquiring a profit, and trading materials is also an important subject in the Shark Tank video. Johnny is a simple farmer who’s looking for a way to profit by selling his product to others, while the sharks are interested in profiting off of Johnny’s idea.
Based on these findings, it is made clear enough that obtaining money is the main objective of all of these people. However, the way in which they are willing to achieve this goal differs from clip to clip. This deviation between each clip is one of the attributes that separates them from one
Between 1787 and 1808, 250,000 new slaves arrived in the U.S. because of the cotton boom (2). Plantation owners were involved in the slave trade which was the transporting and selling humans as slaves. When selling the slaves, prices varied depending on the person's skin color, sex, age and location (3). In 1834, a man named Joseph Ingraham wrote about the slave trade said that “to sell cotton in order to buy negroes—to make more cotton to buy more negroes, ‘ad infinitum,’ is the aim and direct tendency of all the operations of the thorough going cotton planter; his whole soul is wrapped up in the pursuit (3).” Families were separated because of the slave trade.
In section 6 it says,” Traders also sold enslaved people at the auction.” 3rd Body Paragraph plantations section 6 Transition word, the third reason, textual evidence, reasoning/justification (Why is this quote important? How does it explain your reasoning? ): Also, When a ship arrived in the American colonies, the traders sold the West African people to White plantation owners. The first year of enslavement on a plantation was very hard.
One of these differences are, the use of different perspective. Like The Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American slave has a perspective of a coloured slave, An example is: “to go home and be whipped to death, or stay in the woods and be starved to death. ”(Slave’s View) while Slave Owners has the ruthless, unforgiving slaveholders perspective, An example is: “Sir, I cannot thank you enough to lending me two of your slaves. ”(Slaveholder’s View).
Slaves also did not have much freedom; therefore, they were not able to have the simpler life that the Europeans had. Slaves were bought and sold to the highest bidder which showed
This involves slavery and the old south between the years 1800-1860. In the old times when slavery was prominent, slaves used to bought and sold like goods and services been sold in the markets and stores. Slavery was more prominent and experienced in the south than any other part of the United States. In the south, the law stated that slaves should be called and defined as “chattel”, which is explained to be the personal property of their owners.
The slave trade was when settlers took Africans out of their country and brought them to America to use as workers and laborers that they didn’t pay or keep healthy. The slave trade and the Indian Removal Act are similar because both of them did not get the choice on if they got to move from their homes, they were just told to by the Americans. They were also based on racism and greed as
The difference between indentured servants and slaves was that servants had choice and promised freedom. People, mostly those who own land, have the ability to hire servants and slaves. They hire them to help them either with cleaning, raising children, or most commonly, farming or working on the property. Servants and owners create a contract, or deal, where after an agreed amount of time, the servant earns a blank amount of money, maybe land, and receives their freedom in the place that the owner had brought them. Servants most commonly go into servitude because they have then have a way to get to a new world.
Convict leasing was a system of selling prisoner labor to private industries. In the Reconstruction era, the whites lost their free labor, however, they gained convict leasing. The documentary, Slavery by Another Name, provided an understanding of the conditions blacks had to face after being convicted of a crime; conditions that were described as worse then slavery. As previously discussed, black codes were unfair laws that made it easy to arrest blacks and consequently provided whites with cheap labor. The prisoners would be rented by private industries for the length of their sentence; this was a way to justify a form of slavery.
The difference between slaves and slaveholders is how they are negatively effected. Slaves suffer more hardships and suffering due to them being different color and being mistreated by whites. And since they are already poor and can 't afford any food, they won 't be able to survive if they can 't work for their slaveholders. But Slaveholders don 't suffer as much as slaves due. They may lose money and be poor, but they are able to get food and be able to find jobs somewhere else so they can earn money.
Whether or not they have good family or friend connections and what level of power they have can greatly influence their morals. This is expressed thoroughly
In Chapter 3 of A Different Mirror by Ronald Takaki, he attempts to understand the hidden origins of slavery. In this essay, I will describe and analyze how Takaki uses race, ethnicity, historical events, and famous people to have a better understanding of slavery. We know that slavery itself is a system where an individual owns, buys, or sells another individual. The Irish served as indentured servants, not just blacks, but as time passed slavery consisted of just African Americans.
They think money is the most powerful thing you can have. They might also look up to them for the reason of their money. They see the socs as powerful people, and they want to be like them. They want them to be perfect, so they think that and lie to
The detailed descriptions included in primary sources, along with the descriptive and emotional illustrations included in graphic history are crucial elements in studying and understanding the process and history of the transatlantic slave trade. Rafe Blaufarb and Liz Clarke tie both of these together to help readers truly understand this historic tragedy in the book, Inhuman Traffick: The International Struggle Against the Transatlantic Slave Trade. Although different than the standard book that may be used, that simply spews information out in an uncreative and somewhat boring way, this book is a tool that can be chosen in classrooms to teach different aspects of the slave trade. Working together, the primary sources and graphic history
Additionally, the attention of people who are more in appearance rather than saving and donating to the poor will produce a trivial society with no values. Self-interest is also a problem for influences people’s
Capitalism is understood to be the “economic and political system in which a country's trade and industry are controlled by private owners for profit, rather than by the state.” In modern society, capitalism has become the dominant economic system and has become so integrated that it has resulted in a change in the relationships individuals have with other members of society and the materials within society. As a society, we have become alienated from other members of society and the materials that have become necessary to regulate ourselves within it, often materials that we ourselves, play a role in producing. Capitalism has resulted in a re-organization of societies, a more specialized and highly segmented division of labour one which maintains the status quo in society by alienating the individual. Karl Marx and Emile Durkheim theorize on how power is embodied within society and how it affects the individuals of society.