Strict Gun Laws In America

This, they argue, would reduce the pool of guns that criminals can get their hands on, thereby reducing gun violence. One of the articles that entailed this line of thinking was Jonathan Masters’ “Gun Control Around the World: A Primer.” This article, published by the Atlantic in 2016, strikes as a trustworthy news source because it uses facts about what is happening in our world today to communicate why is regulating guns heavily a viable option, all while keeping an objective tone, free from personal

David DeGrazia proposes a moderate control of guns meaning that only individuals with a need for self-protection be allowed to own a gun and only after a complete course in safety (Hsiao and Berstein). DeGrazia also believes that owning a gun increases the likelihood that a person will be killed in their own home whether accidentally or intentionally (Hsiao and Berstein). The Democratic Party believes that stricter background checks will deter guns from being purchased by the wrong people. That might be true, but will it stop a violent person from committing a

Gun Control 1) Donald Trump, the president of the United States, is very positive when it comes to gun rights. He argues against the limitation of guns. He believes that limiting the publics access to firearms makes them more and not less vulnerable to gun violence. Donald Trump believes that making gun reforms are a bad way of solving the problem. He supports his argument by saying that making strict gun laws will lead to a time where only the terrorists and bad guys will have guns, leaving the other citizens unarmed and unprotected.

Paper will discuss that controversial topic of concealed handguns. Being pro concealed weapons, I feel they can prevent crimes from happening and help people to defend themselves in dangerous situations. The contents of this paper will review the arguments for and against concealed handgun and will deliver a policy regarding the public health topic of concealed carry laws. Concealed handgun should be allowed for the main reason that they help to prevent crimes from occurring. Not only is carrying a handgun a right given to US citizens via the constitution (National archives, n.d.), but it's been shown that states with strict or bands on concealed weapons have higher gun involved murder rates (Gius, 2013).

My opinion is Gun Control needs to have a background check on everyone that buys a gun. Today so many Officers, and innocent people are getting hurt, and Donald Trump must promise that Law and Order will be safe for all Americans, and this is what made Donald Trump get a lot of votes, by telling American people you have the right to Bear Arms. The safety of American People is the role of a President,

Those parties in favor of gun ownership and the freedom to use and keep arms rely on the fact that the supply for such rights is treasured in their constitution. In this place of growing violence, gun advocates feel more than ever that their position is justified. As citizens of the United States, possessing a gun is a fundamental right and may even be a necessity to some. Anti-gun lobbyists address the same growing violence and gun-related crimes as an effort to call on the government to take action. By putting down more laws and stricter control, these people that are not in favor of guns, feel society would be a

No matter how many steps we take in the right direction, there will always be evil people that commit heinous acts like the ones previously mentioned. The best thing that anyone can do is just reduce the number of mass shootings to the bare minimum. The first thing that need to happen is stricter gun control. By preventing the sale of high-powered rifles to young adults, mentally unstable personalities, and anyone with a criminal history. While also increasing the level at which background checks are performed and increasing the waiting period that guns are available to the general public.

You must show good moral judgment when you drive as well as when you own guns"(Kyle). The comparison between guns and cars shows the similarity about the role of them in people 's life. Cars although they are quintessential in America people, they will kill people easily if they

As these crime rates keep increasing, we know we are capable of relying on the police. Technology has improved law enforcement as to where the police investigators are liking the benefits of the fingerprint identification. This only allows the law enforcement agents to identify the certain suspect from evidence. As it comes to gun violence, there has been numerous of mass shootings, schools, concerts, drivebys, etc. but as it comes to gun control, the blame for these mass shootings lie in the access to firearms within the United States.

While there are substantial reasons to adopt, ultimately my opponent would benefit more from my view because we are now focusing on the present and for future purposes. Is it worth dying over a teenager who had easy access to guns? An assault weapons? How can we ensure safety in the school system? Should we send our precious child to school just for someone to come in and kill them?

Discussion- This article has given insight into what is going on around the world as this article shows us how gun violence has played a huge role in the world we live in today. The problems that this initiative had was that the ability to be allowed to do consent to search made it hard for officers to abide to others rights. This did solve problems in the beginning as this did reduce gun violence however as this did lower gun violence people felt that this infringed on our first amendment rights. The partnerships that would have made this initiative much more successful would be the help of those in the community as this could put awareness towards the potential crime that is going on. A program like this could be instituted today however it would need to be edited as the key concepts of this idea is ideal however the idea of being able to search those based solely off of your own discretion is not the way to go about it.

“We’ve created a system in which dangerous people are allowed to play by a different set of rules.” “President Obama introduced a new group of executive actions to reduce gun violence.” Obama is doing all that he can do reduce gun violence. As a result of this Gun violence will be lowered to some extent. Guns bring a lot of harm into this world. They can also be our protectors. That

The point of view of the NRA in this campaign is that “The only thing stopping a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.” (Wayne LaPierre, 2012, Washington DC speech) which is exactly what this campaign is trying to enforce. They follow the ideology of conservative libertarianism as they are looking for change in community and government action to bring in new laws and change current policies to protect children, also showing their value of children 's

I feel that gun laws should be made stricter so that crime and violence would decrease because guns usually play a big role in crimes. However, guns shouldn’t be prohibited because it says we have the right to bear arms in the 2nd amendment of the Constitution but the government should be more cautious about guns. “The data shows that strict gun laws reduce violent crimes.” If we have stricter gun laws, the citizens and the environment will be safer. Lives are lost due to gun violence and our community should not have to live in fear over guns. The data “collected by the FBI, show that [guns] were used in 68 percent of murders…” If the government and citizens were more aware of guns, we would not have to witness all these deaths.