Should college football players be putting in 90 hours a week without pay? The average American full-time job is from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. five days a week. So if they get paid for 40- hour weeks shouldn’t a college football player who puts in 90 hours a week get at least a small paycheck. The average division one football player puts in 43.3 hours a week for football. Also, if you have 10 hours of class each week and you study for the recommended 4 hours for each class you have a total of 50 hours for school. So if you do the simple math 40 plus 50 is 90, 90 hours a week in order to keep that scholarship. This is the equivalent to working two full-time jobs with a side job on the weekends just to pay their bills. So when NCAA executives, administrators, university presidents, and coaches who start feeling the burn around the middle of the week, they should remember that their student athletes’ “unpaid jobs” are not only mentally demanding but their 90 hour weeks brings them to …show more content…
For example, athletes who spend 90 hours a week training and studying will make these players hungry after the university's dining options are closed. In these situations scholarships fail to provide the student athletes with additional dining options. Even some of the textbooks they need have to come out of their own pocket. Since 86% of the college athletes live below the poverty line and the average out of pocket expenses for a college athlete total $3,222, they need money for the out of pocket expenses. To many people, these things seem like a small price to pay for a full scholarship, but it is important to remember that these scholarships are the only way many athletes can make it to
First, I think that college football players should get paid because they need extra money today for college. For the first time in history, the NCAA is allowing colleges to pay their athletes cash to cover the cost of things like student fees, laundry and lunch (Cnn). To open enroll in a college out of state it is $22,958 and getting paid for any kind of sport could really help pay the cost (Prepscholar).
That was his mother’s entire annual paycheck! The scholarship suddenly seemed like it would be a drop in a basin of debt. Unfortunately, this situation is similar to that of many college athletes,over eighty six percent of who are poverty-stricken, coming from low-income families, and almost all of them are bombarded with high fees. Though they are in dire need of help, the NCAA, otherwise known as the National Collegiate Athletic Association, refuses to aid these athletes, saying that the players should not receive salaries or any other monetary compensation.
Should NCAA Football Players get Paid? Did you know that 85% of NCAA football players live below the poverty line? This is just one of the many problems about student athletes in the NCAA. College football players should be paid because they simply do not have enough time for a job between college and sports and these student athletes sacrifice their bodies for the love of the game.
Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.
Between Tv deals, ticket sales, and jersey sales there is plenty of money to go around in college athletics, and it is time that the NCAA steps up and compensates athletes. College athletes are stuck in a brief conflict where they think they deserve to be paid just like the pros do. They consider their sport as a job and think they deserve to be paid just like the coaches do. Colleges make a lot of their money through the sports department. Ticket sales are a big way colleges bring in big money.
These players have to spend 50 or more hours a week on their sport with little to no time for other things according to Nocera. All in all, college athletes are basically working a full time job that entertains so many people and benefits so many others besides themselves. Having
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
After graduating from High School one may choose to further his or her education through college. People do this for many reasons. Some people do it for professional benefits, while others do it for sports athletics. This paper will be focusing on those who do go to college for athletic benefits. Specifically, this is focusing on how these college athletes do not get paid and why they should be paid.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.
Although college athletes may be on a scholarship that is paying for their education, they also work countless hours on their craft and make millions for their
Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.
Athletes who get scholarships don’t have to deal or worry about student loans, paying for textbooks, the cost of campus living, and meal plans.(3) Students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about being in debt because of loans because their college education is paid off from the scholarship. Then in the state of Pennsylvania 71 percent of students leave a public four year institution in debt around $32,528.(3) This is a normal person graduating from a college. They have to worry about paying back all of that money and students who get scholarships don’t have to worry about it.
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
A growing debate in the National Collegiate Athletic Association is whether or not student athletes should be paid. The controversy began in 2011 after three hundred coaches and athletes signed a petition to pay college-level athletes, and since then other athletes have made several more arguments. The NCAA has rightfully denied all of the requests, saying they include too much. To pay student athletes could be hugely expensive for colleges, especially because they would not only pay for each athlete’s degree and equipment, but also provide a salary and give bonuses revenue for tournaments. Moreover, college athletes should not be paid because there is not enough money, it takes away a student’s focus from schoolwork, and not every athlete is guaranteed a professional career after graduating; however it is argued that it they are already paid in a way.