Society should realize that not every race will look identical because of the parents genetics which can have a big changes in how the Latino may look. No one should be stereotyped with just their appearances or how they may speak and are judged by
However, it would destroy people 's dignity and individuality where the clones would still have individual personalities. A lot of religious leaders are shunning cloning based on claims that we should not be playing God. Black market will be created for human embryos with specific traits and instead of seeing the many benefits that this
He did this by portraying emotion in his argument with the use of pathos by explaining the benefits of therapeutic cloning by helping a paralyzed woman get her normal life back. He then portrayed ethical moral values by stating through the study of somatic-cell nuclear-transfer research we could use extra embryos instead of putting them to waste by using them in research practices. He finally used showed logos to explain that the U.S. needs more researchers. The structure of his paper was effective to be able to show that his scientific evidence was enough to influence his audience in supporting his belief That therapeutic cloning should be funded by the government, this is why Greenwood had the better
As scientific technology continues to grow, however, an answer to this dilemma has come to the forefront. With in vitro fertilization, many otherwise infertile couples can now become parents. In order to achieve this, doctors go through a process which involves taking eggs from the woman and mixing them with sperm from the man. This creates a number of human embryos for the doctor
According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, scientists use therapeutic cloning to create stem cells with the same DNA by harvesting embryonic cells in their early development, ( Cloning Fact Sheet, 2017 ). As a result, cloned embryos in the test tubes are destroyed. Though therapeutic cloning can offer benefits to human health, gene(or DNA) cloning is a more efficient and preserved route to go. This is because gene cloning proposes close to the same benefits, and does not need the practice of cloning human embryos. DNA cloning can copy stem cells instead of extracting them from human embryos.
Thus stem cells have the potential to cure a large number of diseases and physical ailments such as diabetes, Parkinson’s, spinal cord injury, heart disease, and many more. Stem cells have the power to save many lives without harming anyone, hence following the principle of maximizing benefits and minimizing harm. This principle is proven when the stakeholders are considered. The first stake holders are the donors. Donors are usually females who opt for in vitro fertilization of egg.
However, in human beings, the percentage may lower and may interfere with the natural biological order of life. Arguments for and against cloning of humans do not make a convincing case since reasons used to back the claims are based on various assumptions and ethical issues. The proponents of cloning argue that the technology can help in solving the problem of infertility; help in cloning dead loved ones, and solving the problem of genetic diseases. Cloning can allow a person to have a genetically copy of oneself with all positive traits. However, such claims have not been proved since no human clone has been produced so far (Melo‐Martín 246).
The controversy over prenatal genetic screening has become a major issue among today’s society. Prenatal genetic screening occurs during the first and second trimester which allows physicians to diagnose the fetus by examining blood or other tissue to detect abnormalities (Sagerdo). Due to the scientific advancements in today’s society, the idea of genetic screening has been taken to the next level in forming the idea of a “super baby”. In the United States alone, between sixty-five to seventy percent of women have serum screening in order to evaluate the status of the developing fetus (Sagerdo). Often, when a disease is detected due to a genetic test many parents opt to have an abortion.
Many people believe that scientists should develop a clone human but government are against human cloning. Cloning has several of prejudice. For example, expanded danger of acquired infections comes from the way that all clones have the same qualities and in this manner may be helpless to a specific kind of sickness. This may result in one sickness wiping out a whole population. Another inconvenience is absence of quality variety.
Opponents of animal experimentation point out that useful alternatives exist. Numerous viable alternatives exist; therefore, people should examine and improve it to replace animals (Miller 1). Scientists and physicians did not consider about this problem seriously because thinking about alternatives is more difficult than using animal routinely (Garner 71). Therefore, people should seek the alternatives for not using animal. On the other hand, proponents of animal experimentation claim that there are no useful alternatives.
In The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, Rebecca Skloot presents study cases, such as the study of vaccines and the polio vaccine to prove that HeLa cells have benefitted science for the greater good. The benefits of HeLa cells are shown when the Polio and HPV vaccine is talked about. The polio vaccine benefitted the human race by saving lives and impacted science by progressing further studies. Further studies included the HPV vaccine which gave scientists a vast knowledge on how cancer forms and how it is inserts insert into DNA. It is later proven that the study of Virology is the cause of scientists advanced experimentation with cancer and expanded their boarders with the topic.
My IP address of default gateway is fe80::1286:8cff:feec:de7a%15. My MAC address is BA-EE-65-33-85-BB. 2) Why does every computer on the internet need to have these four numbers? The IP address is specifically made for each unique user. It also helps you get identified on servers, websites, etc.
The embryonic stem cells pose many ethical issues. In order to produce embryonic stem cells, scientists need to disassemble the embryo. Since embryos have a potential to develop into a human baby and its status should be considered as a life, many religious groups contradict against the embryonic stem cell research. The reason why religious groups contradict against the abortion is similar, as it is “murdering” a life. Also, some countries in the world are currently banning the embryonic stem cell research due to ethical reasons.