The Differences Of Huntington's Theory Of International Relations

1281 Words6 Pages
Huntington’s theory was the first to point that international relations from the twentieth century onwards will be based on the world’s identities and cultures, and the differences between them. Huntington focused on interacting societies, wishing to define themselvesthem in a globalizing world. He understood that “cultural identity is what [is] most meaningful to most people” (Huntington S. P., 2011, p. 20). People and nations try to answer on the question “who are we?”. This answer is most likely to go back to the traditional way by which humans answer, human way answering, by referring to what is most important: ancestry, religion, language, history, values, customs and institutes) Ibid). “They identify with cultural groups: tribes, ethnic groups, religious communities, nations, and, at the broadest level, civilizations” (Huntington S. P., 2011, p. 21).
Huntington’s ’s uses civilizations as his paradigm uses civilization as the basic unit for analysis. basic unit of analysis. Civilizations were not a new term in the international relations field, and in fact existed
…show more content…
He presents main types of differences: the way people view relations between god and man (religious differences), between the individual and the group (societal differences), between the citizen and the state (political differences), and between the husband and the wife (cultural differences). Therefore, differences exist alter in cultural terms and concepts between from civilization to civilizationcivilizations, concepts such as responsibility and rights, freedom and authority, and equality and hierarchy. Moreover, “tThese differences are products of centuries and far more fundamental than differences among political ideologies and regimes” (Huntington S. P., The clash of civilizations?, 1993). In fact, these underlying unique cultural characteristics design the political culture of states and
Open Document