The argument of whether organ donors should be compensated for their efforts has become a heated topic. The two sides of the argument have equally valid points, but one must look to the benefit of not only the organ recipients, but also to the donors and to their well-being. There are more ways than one to get the desired organs, not all of them legal in the least. The exploitation of the poor that would accompany the choice of paying people for organ donation would most likely be devastating. Ultimately, organ donation should remain a gift between the donor and the recipient to reduce the chance of exploitation of any participants.
Nevertheless, “Health care providers will never be given enough resources to satisfy all demands placed upon them by a community that is becoming increasingly informed and demanding” (Capp, Savage, & Clarke, 2001, p.40). In addition, due to the scarcity of resources, it has become debatable whether health care is a privilege or a human right (Bodenheimer, 2009). Therefore, limited resources make rationing unavoidable and ethically complex. Rationing can be described as the limitation of potentially beneficial resources to a patient due to resource insufficiency. An example of rationing in medicine is the process for organ transplants.
In a nutshell, the Public Health is the controversial issue because, contingent on how it is characterized, and it might test individuals ' qualities and request penances. The fight between an extensive and a prohibitive perspective of public health is progressing. The comprehensive view demands to surrender a level of individual freedom for the benefit of everyone (Donohoe, 2013). In fact, Public health is a wider societal development, a crusade to amplify health for everybody in the populace through dispersing advantages and obligations in an evenhanded way. The Public Health outlines are regularly dubious because they have a financial effect.
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks tells the story of Henrietta, an African-American woman whose cells were used to create the first immortal human cell line. Told through the eyes of her daughter, Deborah Lacks, aided by journalist Rebecca Skloot. Deborah wanted to learn about her mother, and to understand how the unauthorized harvesting of Lacks cancerous cells in 1951 led to unprecedented medical breakthroughs, changing countless lives and the face of medicine forever. It is a story of medical arrogance and triumph, race, poverty and deep friendship between the unlikeliest people. There had been many books published about Henrietta’s cells, but nothing about Henrietta’s personality, experiences, feeling, life style etc.
Florida and Alabama have proposed that the recipient should have to pay for the test instead (US Health and Human Services). But how is it fair that they should have to pay for the test if there is no reason for them to be tested. In the end the cost of drug testing and testing all approved applicants was between 1.2 and 1.3 million dollars (US Health and Human Services). Drug testing individuals is not worth the money in the end because most people will not test positive. Most people tend to forget that most people receiving aid also are taxpayers.
From the viewpoint of the Lacks family, HeLa has only brought pain. Henrietta’s cells became a great success to scientists everywhere, but the Lacks family was left with no mother or credit. While HeLa cells were off taking part in experiments, the Lacks family had no idea that a part of their mom was still alive. When they finally received word of Henrietta’s cells being used worldwide they were angry for receiving no credit or money. Reporters harassed the Lacks family to try and find information about the cells, but soon realized the Lacks family knew nothing about them.
The reason behind this lack of medical professionals is due to the fact that they too are being underpaid which leads them to not want to volunteer for difficult work when they are not receiving enough pay (“13.4 Problems of Healthcare in the United States” np). If America was to begin paying doctors more than maybe more would volunteer to help out in emergency rooms, which unquestionably require an immense amount of medical professionals to treat emergent illnesses. The two countries share the manner in which their physicians are treated. In order to keep the care consistent and always improving, these issues need to be
Intellect, like athletic skill, is a mix of genetics and hard work: biomedical enhancements undermine all that hard work. It would eliminate intellectual competition and therefore could eliminate innovation and progress. For these reasons I think it is immoral. However, in certain cases, biomedical enhancements of intellect can be justifiably moral. People with attention deficits are given medication to aid their concentration: this is not immoral in my opinion, it simply evens the playing field: it doesn’t simply give everyone the same level of intelligence, it gives everyone an even opportunity to attain a higher
Some challenges that have been noted are: technology issues, cost, bureaucracy, cynicism and failed leadership (Murton, 2018). Integration of technology is not always a smooth transition and can sometimes lead to miscommunications because technology can crash and makes errors. The best equipment and facilities are extremely expensive and this discourages some hospitals from making the transition, this does not even take into account staff training. Bureaucracy often opposes the idea because of the religious overtone that is associated with spiritual healing. Many public institutions distance themselves from religion to seem unbiased towards beliefs.
If I had to pick one hard time in my life I 'd say it would be when my grandpa Marvin was in the hospital. He 's the kind of man that likes to do stuff himself rather then have people do it for him. So the hospital life was not for him, especially when you can 't do anything and the nurses have to help with everything. It all started when Grandpa had fallen down and injured his leg. He had trouble walking and his leg just never quite worked the same.