Is Gerrymandering a Controversial Topic? Gerrymandering is a process where the ruling political party uses the map of their state to draw lines that create voting districts in favor of their party. The result of this is that it doesn’t reflect the voters political views. For about 200 years the government has used gerrymandering during political elections and it continues to be used today (King, Elizabeth) .
When President George W. Bush was reelected in 2004, the people who voted him thought that he would be able to stimulate the economy and create jobs. However, once the voters realized that he was unable to run the country as productively as they wanted him to do, his popularity faded. This resulted in Congress and President Bush popularity votes dropping to all-time lows of 38 percent and 28 percent respectively (Milakovich & Gordon, p.8). These numbers resulted in voters believing they should vote democratic as opposed to Republican, in which added to the victory of Barack Obamas election to the
Partisans on both sides of politics are often so angry with each other that they barely communicate, making it difficult to work together to find solutions for America’s issues. Extreme partisans sometimes refuse to work with members of an opposing party. Each party believes the other is treasonous, and is purposely harming the nation. The same Pew Research Center study found that opposite sides do not just believe they have better ideas, but honestly think the other party is more interested in partisan gains than the well-being of the nation. The study also found that over that last thirty years the nation has become more partisan, and Congress has become less effective.
“A vote is like a rifle, its usefulness depends upon the character of the user.” - Theodore Roosevelt Do we need uneducated, random, and altogether unconstitutional forced votes clogging up our ballot? Those rallying for compulsory voting boast better representation of the lower class. If compulsory voting is so grand then please do explain why so many countries (the majority even.) do not enforce or even avoid their compulsory voting laws in place.
The media is a major source of information for voters. Voters depend on the media to make their decision on who to support and vote for. As much trouble as the media causes, they play a major role in our political system. The American President accurately depicts the political process.
Immigration has long been one of the most heated debates in the U.S. coincidentally, Republicans tend to be harsher and less tolerant in an array of policies, compared to democrats. Ultimately the debate between who gets let in and who gets left out comes down to perspective and political ideals shaped by a coagulation of principles likes nationalism or humanitarianism. Savage, and Agren, and Colarusso give an impressive depiction of the issue of immigration from the inside of government to the outskirts of Central America giving rise to the questions concerning accommodation, money, safety, domestic acceptance, and international responsibility, all culminating to the idea that immigration reform may be a lose-lose game. Savage and Agren readily
According to Mother Jones, “Over the past decade, Republican legislators have pushed a number of measures critics say are blatant attempts to suppress minority voting, including voter ID requirements, shortened early voting periods, and limits on same-day voter registration. But minority voters are often disenfranchised in another, more subtle way: polling places without enough voting machines or poll workers.” These restrictions cause a lower percentage of voter turnouts within the population of minorities. Due to this discrimination minorities are not correctly represented in society causing a greater bias towards undermining the minority. According to CNN, minorities in America have “less confidence in the criminal justice system” compared to white Americans.
John Adams presidency was controversial. Following George Washington’s presidency, John Adams became president but not by many votes. John Adams presidency was an ineffective President of the United States. I believe he was ineffective due to the XYZ Affair, the Alien and Sedition ACts, his political parties, and him isolating his cabinet and him as vice president. First of all, the XYZ Affairs and Alien and Sedition Acts played an impact on John Adams ineffective presidency.
As explained in greater detail later, the creation of political opinions in the American citizenry is driven, in part, by the most recently received information; therefore, the loss of variety among sources of information led to an equal loss of variety among political opinions. As moderate engagement declined, so too did moderate sources of information allowing the remaining radicals to further drive apart the electorate through their
Most actual Americans trace their free speech to the Constitution — not a bank account that has lots and lots of zero’s at the end. A prominent pollster once said, “When does the pursuit of victory exact to a higher price? When does dishonesty distort democracy?” Politicians, political parties or media that fail to condemn these tactics — as well as broadcasters that air these ads and the consultants that make them — are all complicit in the Koch’s immorality.
In “ The Fall and Rise of Partisan Journalism” by James L. Baughman, the author argues that a person does not have to have intellectual capabilities or higher education to realize that the American newspapers, especially those in the 19th century have been partisan in their reporting. This implies that the main purpose of the editorials in these newspapers were to compel people to share their views, recruit a following as well as ensure that those that read them stuck around. Therefore, these newspapers exercised the inherent power of the press to create situations that would retain readership rather than to offer eloquently and factual articles, for instance, such newspapers would not report news that would flatter the opposition. The reason for this partisanship is attributed to economics as it has been proven that the newspapers engaged in business with parties, the government or the Congress amongst other bodies that greatly subsidized their operations.
Jonathan Wolff’s article primary addresses the unfair treatment of social and economic rights, emphasizing on the current global health crisis in particular; it disputes human rights not equally prioritized. He then poses a challenging but essential question: “How can there be a human right to health if the resources are just not there to satisfy it?” He obviously takes to heart the necessity of good health care as a natural right for humans and he believes it should be legally our right to have a good health system. His believe can draw once mind to reevaluate Franklin Roosevelt's 1941 speech in which he alleged that the “four freedoms”—freedom of speech and worship, and freedom from fear and want—are basic human rights. Wolff construes, the right to health is a human right as reported by the Declaration of Human Rights.
Leighann Lord quotes, “Did you know America ranks the lowest in education but highest in drug use? Its nice to be number one but we can fix that. All we need to do is start war on education.” What Leighann Lord doesn’t address is fixing the issue of drug use among adolescents is mandatory drug testing in schools.