Film Comparisons: Same cinematography, Matured Purposes As you can see, once the director’s general objectives have been put side by side, it becomes clear that there is a relationship. The most apparent connection would obviously be the books because the plot lines are continuous and intertwine. However, it seems that their influence may artistically be overlooked and is interesting to see how the same cinematic element can be used for opposing purposes. The Prisoner of Azkaban vs. The Deathly Hallows: Part 1 As mentioned before, the main link between the third and seventh film is the focus on environment. It seems that due to difference in maturity between the two films affected the objectives of the directors in a way that evolved the …show more content…
Both films are shot on location and the shots of the landscapes are impactful. They contrast with the rest of the films because there is an unprecedented naturalness that grounds the films and makes them feel like real places the audience could actually be a part of. As established before, Cuarón primary focus was to be explicit about the relationship between the characters and the environment, where he used the environment to reveal more of the world to audience. Many of the scenes, such as the Care of Magical Creatures class, the Hogsmeade excursion and the trio running through the school grounds feature the scenic landscape, which is then combined with prolonged shots of the scenery that set the time, place and mood of a scene. The use of a shot of the Weeping Willow and a shot of a flower wilting and blooming through the seasons also acts as a transition between plot points. (See Figure 3A, 3B) Respectively, Yates used the same technique in the seventh film. The use of a feather and the transitioning between locations that the characters were searching are prime examples of this, but what sets the seventh film a part is that it’s a Road …show more content…
This is where the reflection between the films becomes apparent. The cinematography in both films is very similar; however, Cuarón uses it to reveal the world whereas Yates uses it reveal the characters. Cuarón’s use of the environment nearly pieces the movie and characters together, but Yates’s utilization pulls it a part. Most of Cuaron’s shots of the environment are combined with a shot of the trio working together, such as when they are running through the lawn to save Buckbeak while Yate’s shots pull them a part, where we see many isolated shots that show how small they are or many shots where we first see an vast, empty landscape before they apparate in, which also emphasizes loneliness. Furthermore, the shot styles between the films are reflective of each other. The extreme close-ups, slow moving camera, and mis-en-scene are impactful in creating atmosphere. In the third film, the slow moving camera takes on a presence rather than a character, which embodies the omens that are essential to the films
In my opinion there are a lot of comparisons between the film and the book, but there are also differences between them too, but also they have impacted the audience in both the film and the
Even though the book and movie and the movie have similarities they also have lots of differences
First of all, I think this because the movie showed more which made me comprehend it more. The setting in the movie made me comprehend it more which in the movie I didn’t see the setting that well. Another reason why I think the movies made me comprehend it more is because I got to visually see where the characters were living and telling us their story.
Moreover, the repeated image of deer, which recurs in various forms throughout the film -
And the scene were the reverend slaps ariel in the church after she screams out “ I’m not even a virgin!” Although there a quite a few noticeable changes brought about in these two films one is a classic and the other is still a hit movie. The ending of either of these movies basically go hand in hand, the ends justify the means, the resistance of the petition, and at the dance where Chuck shows up and Ren beats him up. All of these event are close to identical.
One huge difference in the setting, in the book the story takes place on the shore of lake Michigan in a brand new apartment building in a small town. On the other hand the movie takes place old, run down apartment in the middle of a huge city. Another example is the characters, in the book there are 16 heirs with eight pairs. In the movie there are 10 heirs and 5 pairs. Also the movie leaves out some huge characters like Theo Theodorakis, Flora Baumbach, and
It’s easy to pin point the difference but in reality they share common themes which includes life lessons. Despite the difference in the years and the actors both the classic and sequel has common themes that can be applied to situations now in day. When we compare and contrast
Both of these are very powerful tools created by people to really portray the horrible events that occurred and really happened to people in the Holocaust. There are many similarities and difference between the two movies but neither is more or less powerful in getting the point of complete disgust across to the viewer. There
Even though they may have shared some similarities, they also have some differences like the setting of where
The audience learns in the films how fear, suspicion, and prejudice can have tragic consequences. The main story line of both films is that a group of neighbors falsely accuse each other of being an alien, like they do in the 1960 film, or a terrorist, which they do in the 2002 version. Chaos quickly erupts and violence breaks out amongst the mob. Neighbors turn against neighbors, and in the 1960 episode, someone ends up being shot dead. The 2002 version has its characters burn down a house.
A long shot, high angle shows this. In both films, the love between protagonists leads to the end of the films of the very different family's getting
The main characters desired the luxurious life of being wealthy, but knew they had to put in work to get to where they wanted to be. Their image of the world was quite unrealistic due to the fact they were living in the past. Both films were superior representations of The
Even though they were produced in two completely different time periods, Blade Runner and Double Indemnity share a substantial amount of similarities. Each film’s use of cinematic elements points towards them following a film noir style of filming. Though Blade Runner’s sci-fi genre does push it towards a more modernized version of film noir, commonly known as neo-noir, it still shares many similarities with Blade Runner. Low key lighting, shadows, smoke, compact spaces, and pathetic fallacy are all classic film noir qualities seen throughout the films. Both films also focus their plots upon the main character's attraction to a “femme fatale”:
Although, they have similarity, the two stories has major differences also. First, both author differs the way they introduce and develop their lead characters to the reader. Second, they also differ in perspective from which their stories are being told. Third, they differs on the choice of settings and how it impact to the stories.
In the film 12 Years a Slave the editor, Joe Walker, makes use of a couple of techniques and styles that adds to the film in its own way. Long shots – Joe kept the long shots as long as he thought was necessary to add to the subject matter and the feeling he wanted to bind with the story. At the end of the film there’s this extremely long shot where Solomon is practically staring at the camera for about a minute and a half. The timing of that shot is so perfect because it’s not too short so you don’t have enough time to think about what just happened or too much time to overthink the situation. Closer to the end of the shot he lets the sound fade slowly and rapidly gives you a wakeup call when the next shot starts off where Solomon and the rest of the slaves are busy working in the field.