Animal Testing In Cosmetic Products

Animals have similar anatomy to humans, but it is still vastly different. What works on an animal could have a totally different effect on humans. For example, according to the FDA, Vioxx, a drug used to treat arthritis, was found to be safe when tested in monkeys (and five other animal species) but has been estimated to have caused around 320,000 heart attacks and strokes and 140,000 deaths worldwide. This proves that medical testing on animals isn’t necessarily beneficial considering the physiological differences between man and animal. But that’s not the only case of medical testing gone wrong.

There are several reasons to why animal testing needs to be stopped. The method of animal testing is ‘bad science’ since The Food and Drug Administration reports that 92 out of every 100 drugs that pass animal tests fail in humans. Animals might have similarities to humans but they’re not exactly the same, which means testing on animals is useless. Because of that, animal testing is also an act of wasting our time, money and resources that we can spend on other human-relevant researches. In America, 106,000 deaths a year are attributed to reactions to medical drugs.

The only way to know if the product works is to test on another human being. Outlawing animal testing will cause people to die. Life saving drugs weren 't never able to reach the market. Vaccines for diseases are tested on animals.

In addition, some of the experiments done on animals are improperly performed and cause extreme pain. Anesthetization, intubation, and euthanasia are some examples of lab procedures that need qualified training and proper skill. For example, neavs said, “if a researcher uses a paralyzing agent on an animal but does not monitor vital signs to make sure she/he is adequately anesthetized, there is a great chance that the animal is actually experiencing pain but unable to move.” Sadly, researchers often lack the training and sensitivity needed for proper animal testing and it’s taken out on the animals. Animal testing is cruel and inhumane and the harm and suffering needs to be put to an

Studies have shown that 92 out of 100 tests on animals for our products don’t even pass through humans. This evidence shows that animal testing is not an effective way to test our products. Another test was done with 1,000 potential stroke products, those that showed up successful in animals (10%) were

Although the article later did state that with the increasing knowledge of human genes, proteins, and cells animal research on human diseases may later become a thing of

Animal testing is barbaric and cruel. Behind closed laboratory doors, animals are abused and tortured all over the country for the purpose of biological research; it is used to test the safety of consumer or industry products. The human race is almost completely blind to speciesism, which is defined as, “the assumption of human superiority leading to the exploitation of animals. ” We discriminate against animals because they have no moral, cognitive, or social abilities – would we do the same to a human being with severe mental impairments? In the 1700s, Jeremy Bentham wrote, “The question is not, ‘can they reason?’, nor, ‘can they talk?’, but ‘can they suffer?’”

What are the ethics of animal testing? I think this question can only be answered by the list of issues and limitations of animal testing. Therefore, from my real life situation: Using animals for biomedical researches can be beneficial, but detrimental for the animals.

Later tests on pregnant mice, rats, guinea pigs, cats, and hamsters did not result in birth defects unless the drug was administered at extremely high doses. Animal tests on the arthritis drug Vioxx showed that it had a protective effect on the hearts of mice, yet the drug went on to cause more than 27,000 heart attacks and sudden cardiac deaths before being pulled from the market. It should stop because if we keep killing animals millions a year after awhile they will start becoming extinct. Some people might argue that god gave us animals to have to eat and use for purposes on earth like testing; but others will saying we are also here and what's the difference between us and animals.

This included 1,272 monkeys, 5,771 rabbits, 24,556 guinea pigs, and 33,280 hamsters. This shows that scientists don’t care about what the animals are going through, pain or no pain, they just want to advance in medical techniques, do their job, and get their money. Although humans may benefit from successful animal research, the pain, suffering, and deaths of these animals are not worth this kind of benefit. Animals and humans are alike in many ways. We both think, feel, behave, and experience pain.

More than one hundred and fifty human stroke trials using treatments successful in animals have failed as have at least two dozen animal diabetes cures. Vioxx was tested successfully in eight studies using six animal species, yet this anti-inflammatory medicine may have caused the deaths of more Americans than the Vietnam War”(USA Today, John J. Pippin). If the results aren 't always accurate, why do we continue to perform the

This shows that an animal’s anatomy is too different than a human’s to give correct results. To sum up, animals are not identical to humans which can make them bad testing subjects. In summary, animals should not be used in testing. Animal experimentation is cruel and inhumane, and it can be replaced with other methods.

Increasingly, studies show that: Adverse drug reactions kill more than 10,000 people a year in the U.K. (and more than 100,000 in the U.S.) These outrageous numbers fail reassure us that all drugs undergo testing on animals to ensure human safety. Many studies published in the scientific literature company drug side effects in humans and animals have found animal tests to be less predictive than tossing a coin. (Archibald 14) Therefore, it is inevitable at this point in time, that humans are the ultimate

Did you know that millions of animals suffer in the U. S. just because of animal testing? When these animals are getting tested, they feel pain, but cannot react to it because they cannot speak up. To begin with, animal testing is not effective. Many animals do not get all of the same diseases that humans get.

In the end, the minimal protections offered by the AWA and PHS policy provide no real safety or relief to the millions of animals in labs and offer only a false sense of security to the caring public. All it takes is for people to know the facts about animal testing and what truly goes on behind closed doors. If more people understood how it affects the lives of animals, maybe, just maybe their could be a change in the way people think about animal