Henry E. Heffner and Carl Cohen who are proponents of animal experimentation point out that it is necessary because it can protect human health. However, Robert Garner and Sarah Rose A. Miller who are opponents of animal experimentation claim that it is unacceptable because it causes animals to suffer. Two aspects of the arguments about animal research are about the use of laboratory animals and the idea of using substitution for live animals, and although the authors mostly disagree
Henry E. Heffner and Carl Cohen who are proponents of animal experimentation point out that it is necessary because it can protect human health. However, Robert Garner and Sarah Rose A. Miller who are opponents of animal experimentation claim that it is unacceptable because it causes animals to suffer. Two aspects of the arguments about animal research are about the use of laboratory animals and the idea of using substitution for live animals, and although the authors mostly disagree
We shouldn’t silent such a topic, because of fears of upsetting people who affected – yet they should know what they are applying to their face is being used to torture innocent animals. One type of testing – and arguably, one of the worst – is Draize tests. This involves taking a young rabbit and trapping hundreds in confined stocks together. Then, taking a rabbit, clipping its eyelids to prevent their bodies instinct to repel the toxic chemicals by blinking, and shaving their stomachs. Toxic chemicals are then poured and smeared in the rabbit’s eyes and monitored to check how toxic it is.
All it is saying is that that are going to get these helpless animals and these people at BSI are going to gas them with chemicals, inject them with diseases, and risk of killing them. It says that some animals have died in this process and won’t even get recorded into the data, so the number of 115 million animals used, isn’t exact. This medicine will cause psychological stress and pain to these animals. The same animals that could be in your house right now. Do you really want people to kill these animals that could be found in your house?
Animal testing indicates supporting human beings through using another species for our human benefits. It’s been seen as an unethical action, something cruel; due to the fact that we take away the animal freedom. However, if we weren’t to use animal testing, the medicines and cosmetics we use today wouldn’t have been known to be safe. Yet, it should be considered to see whether it is ethically right to let animals suffer only because of our own influences. Even though it would be very reasonable to get rid of animal cruelty, it wouldn’t only indicate the banning of animal testing, but also the preventing of the production of clothing and the provision of food such as the meat of an animal Even though there are many reasons for claiming animal testing to be wrong, scientists don’t stop to use animals for medicines and scientific research.
Testing on animals will make them blind, sick, and many more dangerous actions. Animals should not die or be harmed for unnecessary products. They will make more animals die for products that not everyone needs. The research will harm all types of animals that could be endangered. A bunny becomes bond just so we can use mascara.
Mahatma Gandhi once stated, “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.” In today’s world, animals are being used to control scientific variables in experiments including drug testing, the creation of cosmetics, and treatments for diseases. Animal testing can be beneficial in the aspect that it has contributed to many life-saving cures and treatments. However, on the other hand, animal testing can be seen as cruel and inhumane because of the way animals are treated. Animal testing is more complicated in the aspect that it is not just simply putting the end product on the animals, but torturing the defenseless animals with relentless experiments causing an unknown amount of pain. For example,
(2nd main point) Despite the benefits that the animal experiments bring to the society and people, the practice has strong negative implications for the animals as well as for people 1. Even after conducting experiments on animals, the drugs still need to be tested on people, and as the data provided by the National Institutes of Health used by PETA indicate, 95% of medications that are shown safe for animals do not pass human trial (Animal Testing Is Bad Science, 2017). 2. At the same time, according to The Animal Ethics Reader, animal experiments tend to come at human cost, considering the fact that in the case of relying on unreliable animal experiments concerning thalidomide, thousands of children were born without limbs (Armstrong & Botzler,
It is clear that there are both advantages and disadvantages to using live animals for scientific research. Animal testings may improve the understanding of medical knowledge and advance the health of human beings. These benefits, however, using the life of animals and include some inappropriate treatments to those testers. A great deal of animals using in the tests are dead because of harsh environment. In addition, animals are not as same as humans because they have different DNA and size, so the result of those researches that using animal tests are
Animal testing is not only cruel and inhumane, but also ineffective. Animals do not have many of the diseases that humans have, like heart diseases, cancer, or Parkinson 's disease. Instead, resources are wasted trying to infect these animals with all these different types of diseases that they would never normally contract. An article from the website Cruelty Free International states how 90% of drugs fail in human trials despite showing promising results in animal trials. Experiments done on animals are mostly unreliable and cause unnecessary harm to them.