Military Draft Benefits

The Selective Service Act gives the United States president the authorization to draft soldiers into war. It was enacted in 1917 during World War I and last practiced during the Vietnam War is 1973, drafting 2.2 million soldiers. Although last used over forty years ago, today, men are still legally required to sign up for the draft within thirty days of their birthday or face consequences, fines, or prison time. When it was first instated, there were only approximately one-hundred-thousand people who volunteered for the military so then president, Woodrow Wilson, found it necessary to have a draft if the US were to stand a chance in World War I. However, it is debated whether or not the selective service is needed anymore,

Local draft boards were becoming too picky about the men they sent to serve America in the Vietnam War, and they began to believe they knew what was right for their country. Similarly, to the New Jersey example, there were issues when it came to the boards that had World War II veterans on them. There was also bias within those boards because the veterans had their own view on what a war should be like, and they believed that fighting for the US should be a honor. The war veterans were also known for viewing the Vietnam War like it was similar to their experience in The Second World War. An example of times when these veterans tried to relate to young men being drafted during Vietnam was when parents would call the boards expressing their concern for their sons. A New York Times article provides evidence for a situation when that occurred, General Hershey the draft's veteran director once said, "Members and personnel of the board appreciate the concern of parents when their sons are being called into service... most of them know from personal experience the trials of such times” (Fred

On a Friday, sitting next to the Victory Bell on the commons of Kent State University in Kent, Ohio, there were one thousand young students giving a nonviolent protest about the Vietnam War currently being fought by US troops. This particular protest didn’t differ from any of the other universities’ protests, but when Saturday night came, some twenty-five protesters set the ROTC building ablaze. These twenty-five did this to start a movement for civil rights in America. This was the beginning of the defining year of the USA: 1970.

In David Barno’s , “A New Moral Compact,” he stresses about our countries current military situation, which is all-volunteer. Barno has also served time in the military himself as a lieutenant general. He claims that the countries current dependence on the all-volunteer military, allows us to rush into war without thinking about the consequences first. Barno proposes the idea, “that every use of military force over 60 days would automatically trigger an annual draft lottery to call up 10,000 men and women” (p.20).This solution is useful but it is not useful enough because it targets sympathy from the people while he needs to target the president because the president can initiate a war without consent of the people or Congress.

The short story, “The Lottery” was written and published in 1948, three years after the end of the Second World War. During World War II, there was a system set up called the draft in which the government chooses groups of young men to fight at random. This was very scary and chosen at random for the young men. The draft, in a few ways, refers a lot to “The Lottery” and Shirley Jackson was surely influenced by the recent war in the making of this short story. It is a totally random and scary for the individuals called in both instances.

From the beginning of the United States’ history, conflict has always been prevalent. The need for armed forces continually grows, especially in times of war, as the fight for freedom becomes more challenging. Conscription, better known as the draft, was first introduced during the Civil War as a way to get more individuals involved in the military to fill vacant positions. The practice of the draft was finally discontinued in favor of an all-volunteer military system, when the need for troops was no longer necessary. After almost two decades of being involved overseas, the demand for armed troops is imperative once again. In the essay “A New Moral Compact,” David W. Barno formally uses effective rhetorical techniques to successfully argue that a draft lottery system is essential for the United States’ involvement in armed foreign conflict to subside.

The purpose of the draft is to recruit physically capable citizens to the armed forces if they are required. The draft should recruit from all of the physically capable, no matter their gender. It is frequently argued there are less physically capable than there are men, and while that is true, it should not stop the millions of women who are physically capable. As of 2011, about 203,000 women serve in the active-duty military, including sixtynine serving as generals and admirals. Though this impressive number is only about fifteen percent of the total active-duty force, the amount of women serving continues to rise.

The article fails to show the other side of the story; the story of of the Zombies. Why the young generation

In times of duress, the government has often required a nationwide calls-to-arms to unify its people toward a common goal: stimulating the economy by creating of government jobs with President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s Civilian Conservation Corps in the depths of the Great Depression or the nationwide military draft for young men of 18 years of age that persisted until the Vietnam War. Programs of required service have long been promoted for “In exchange for the privileges of American citizenship, every individual has obligations to meet...and posterity to keep”, according to author and political science expert Larry J. Sabato. This ideal is essential to the culture of the United States, but implementing a required national service program is economically unsound and oversteps the fundamental American value of

As President Roosevelt signed the selective training and service act of 1940. As the country’s first peacetime draft and formally established the act as an independent federal agency within the department of defense. Even before this there was a long history of drafting citizens to serve in the armed forces.

Jeff McMahan probes the morally-provocative question, “is morally permissible for an individual to join the armed forces if he will thereby become an “unjust combatant?” I will present two arguments to debate this question, epistemic justification and pacifism. I will implore the use of Reserve Police Battalion 101 as a historical example to support my conclusion that epistemic justification, or the moral permissibility for a man to join the armed forces in defense of an unjust cause, as the stronger of the two arguments.

onscription seems to violate some of the rights mentioned in both the U.S. Constitution and the Declaration of Independence. The debated constitutionality of conscription has gone on for years because the practice is listed in the constitution. However, there is no max extent to conscription power leading to disagreements between citizens and the government about how the use of this practice can lead to the constraint of other constitutional rights. Our First Amendment guarantees citizens the Freedom of Religion. Imagine if a drafted individual’s religion was totally opposed to war of any kind. Should that individual be forced to violate the religious laws they hold dearly? Should they be forced to disobey their God in order to fulfill

Before deciding whether or not to do something, one must realize exactly how important their decision is and how much it affects the world around them. Most of the the time, it makes a huge difference because there is no decision that does not have at least the slightest significance. In “A Nation Worth Defending”, Willian J. Bennett says that” This historical ignorance is not merely of academic concern. It has real-world consequences.”, and reports that” In what was perhaps the most-striking finding, one-third said that they would evade a military draft in the war on terrorism; another third would refuse to serve abroad; and just one-third would willingly go fight overseas”, which means that people do not want to get involved in the war on terrorism even though it it’s one of the most important and impactful wars. They fail to see how their input matters, and so they decide not to do anything at

After losing the war the Vietnam Veterans came home to scrutiny and shame because they fought in the war. It was tough they had no choice in the matter, it was either be drafted or go to jail. Men ranging from 18 to 25 years old being thrown into a lottery drafted to serve their county

For instance, during the Vietnam War, many claimed that people were excused from fighting. One way that they would do this was through receiving deferments based off of their family backgrounds, such as, “Men who were ...needed at home to support their families might be granted deferments. It is worth noticing that many men received deferments were from wealthy and educated families. Prominent political figures accused of avoiding the draft includes Bill Clinton, Joe Biden and Dick Cheney,” (Valentine 2). Because people complained of these mishaps occurring during the war, the government began raising concerns about the controversies involved with the draft. Being selected to join the military became an annoyance to many rather than an honor, and more people protested the draft. Since people from rich, educated families were able to avoid the draft, and those who were poor began to protest it, it began to become ineffective. Another instance of the draft evolving due to people was complaints associated with the draft selections. Shown in the encyclopedia of the Vietnam War, “ The vast majority of draftees were poor, undereducated, and urban—blue-collar workers or unemployed. This reality struck hard in the African American community. Furthermore, African Americans were woefully underrepresented on local draft board,”(Coffey 2). This reality caused several protests and complaints to be filed due to the unfair treatment given to the people of the United States. Furthermore, the prejudice and bias in the United States caused citizens to make claims about the unfair selections of the military draft. In conclusion, people of the United States changed the way that the draft has been run because of the unfair selections and ideologies behind the draft in the