When a woman chooses to keep her baby, it may not be her decision; it may be her moral duty to the society influenced by her family’s pressure and religious belief. However, if she considers the broad social factors that will shape and influence her views, and that will allow her to make individual choices such as whether to keep her baby or not, she is applying what C. Wright Mills’ called the Social Imagination. James Henslin (2013) stated that C. Wright Mills’s sociological imagination gives us the ability “to understand how our personal troubles (the problems we experience) are connected to the broader conditions of our society” (p. 2). It allows us to question the “norms” and gives us the ability to see things from different perspectives …show more content…
In Poland, unless a woman is a rape victim or her health is in danger, abortion is considered a crime. Still, because of Poland 's strict abortion laws that are highly motivated by conservative politicians and the Catholic church, a woman can be refused an abortion despite the implications that having another baby could make her go blind (Alicja Tysiac v Poland). Compared to Poland – abortion in South Africa is legal but unavailable, particularly for black women. One young lady named Liz (Sarah Diehl 's first case study ) — a rape victim, related her tragic story of how her parents kicked her to the street when they found out that she is pregnant. She is forced to rest on park benches and in shopping malls, while pregnant. She literally sleeps with one eye open, afraid of being raped again. In the documentary, it seems that women in South Africa have a much more tough time obtaining information and services in public hospitals because of the influence of pro-life advocates that reinforces the stigma of abortion (Abortion Democracy). This, in my opinion, contributes to the harsh and judgmental attitude of medical staffs who refuse to perform or partake in safe abortion care. Bottom line, despite the differences in abortion policies and laws regulating abortions – both Polish and South African women, struggle dearly for their rights and recognition as they live out the widespread impact of religious fanaticism, sexism, violence, and
Rather than stating the argument, Willis poses it as a question, “Are the fetuses the moral equivalent of born human beings?” (Abortion Debate 76), thus showing how modern feminists can only support one side of the argument in their chosen stance, and cause limitations by doing so. In doing so, Willis shows how to some “extent… we objectify our enemy and define the terms of our struggle as might makes right, the struggle misses its point” (Ministries of Fear 210), which implies that feminists have completely missed the point of the argument by getting caught up in an answer. Rather than looking for a compromise or gray area, they exert their stance as the only solution that woman can have. Willis also shows how feminists fundamentally “see the primary goal of feminism as freeing omen from the imposition of so called ‘male values’, and creating an alternative culture based on ‘female values’”
In the article, Matthew Day summarizes the event of Polish women going on strike to protest a proposed abortion ban. Essentially abortion would be forbid in Polish in all cases, except if the life of the mother is threatened. According to Day, the past law used to allow abortion in the cases of rape and incest, but the new proposed one would completely ban it even for women under this circumstances. As stated by Day, on the day of the protest named “Black Monday” tens of thousands of Polish women dressed in black missed work to protest against the new proposed law that would totally ban abortions. The new legislation would impose woman who undergoes the procedure imprisoned and the doctors that performs the procedure would be criminalized.
She tries to convince the reader that although the woman may think that she has no other option, there will always be something more appropriate than abortion. In summary, the author says that it is wrong to act impulsively and that women need to think about the consequences before attempting the termination of her child. She explains how the small human inside is “alive and growing” (P 23). Mathewes-Green addresses the concept of the child being “unwanted”, and how that is not true because “we are valuable simply because we are members of the human race” (P 21). The language the writer uses has a strong effect on a woman's heart, especially future and current mothers.
Within chapter 1 "The Promise" in The Sociological Imagination, (1959), C. Wright Mills focuses upon the connection between personal troubles and their linkage to social trends. Throughout the opening chapter, Mills believed the men and women of the 20th century were to intolerant, not possessing the quality of mind necessary to grasp biography and history within society. Further, Mills emphasised the importance of seeing the connections between social structure and individual agency, whereby he identifies the difference between “private troubles” and “public issues”. C. Wright Mills aims to look beyond the individual, thus considering the forces of race, gender, social class and their impact on shaping one 's behaviour and decision making.
Fight for Women’s Rights Book Review of Katha Pollitt’s book PRO: reclaiming abortion rights. Katha Pollitt does not hesitate in voicing her sarcasm, critique opinions, and resourceful facts in the book PRO: RECLAIMING ABORTION RIGHTS; With A New Twist. Pollitt identifies with reshaping abortion views into a normal reproductive life with women and centralizing women in the reproductive decision process. The book is designed into talking to the “muddled middle”, who is a group of people who do not have a significant stance on the issue and informing them with facts on both sides of the abortion debate followed with primary and secondary sources for evidence.
According to Gale, an online library, defines abortion as “a medical or surgical procedure that ends a pregnancy” (Abortion). The ethnic issues behind abortion that has been going on for many years. The woman’s right to abortion has created such turmoil around the world because it goes against people’s religious beliefs. It is also seen as the murder of a human. In the articles, “Abortion Should Be Legal” by Stephen Currie and “Abortion Should Not Be Restricted” by Diana Brown, both authors agree that abortion should not be illegal and considered as an acceptable practice by society.
There is a long untold history on abortion before it was officially legalized and accepted in a society. Between the 1800’s and 1973 abortion was criminalized and was believed to be the devils practice to anyone who tried to perform abortions and those who chose to try and do abortions were thrown into jail for helping a women. During this time, women of both black and white races were shunned from their homes and sent to an asylum or arrested along with their lover if the women got pregnant before marriage. In fear of being shunned or arrested, women performed illegal abortions that were very deadly, women tried inflicting pain to themselves by throwing themselves down stairs, or tried stabbing themselves in the stomach with scissors or knifes. They also injected poisons and toxins such as bleach into their bodies which caused most women organ failure and/or death, and if they survived they were disfigured or were in pain from permanent injuries.
On the basis of the sociological imagination, the behavior and attitudes of people be perceived in the context of the social forces that shape their actions.. Wright Mills developed the theory, and he stressed that the changes in society have an enormous impact on our lives. Before 1970, legal abortions were unheard of in the United States and the people perceived abortion as a taboo and a despicable act. However, once the law was changed so that doctors could perform legal abortions, the attitude of the people changed. To prove the fact that abortion is a social problem, we need to look at the components of a social issue.
The argument over a woman’s right to choose over the life of an unborn baby has been a prevalent issue in America for many years. As a birth control activist, Margaret Sanger is recognized for her devotion to the pro-choice side of the debate as she has worked to provide sex education and legalize birth control. As part of her pro-choice movement, Sanger delivered a speech at the Sixth International Neo-Malthusian and Birth Control Conference in March of 1925. This speech is called “The Children’s Era,” in which she explains how she wants the twentieth century to become the “century of the child.” Margaret Sanger uses pathos throughout her speech as she brings up many of the negative possibilities that unplanned parenthood can bring for both children and parents.
She is in a state of mental suffering and is faced with the dilemma of aborting the pregnancy or keeping it. In order to maintain the status quo, she decides to abort the pregnancy. After failing to get abortion drugs from the pharmacist, she finally got the drugs from the alley at an exorbitant price. The Unborn Child: The main center of controversy in the text.
Psychoanalytic & Care Feminisms Essay For a majority of the course thus far, we have focused on how women’s oppression has been either socially, politically, or economically rooted in our society. With that being said, today, I will be taking an entirely different approach to the issue of women’s oppression. Instead of focusing on the superficial aspects of society that influence said oppression, I will be analyzing the biological and psychological influences. Throughout this essay, I will be exploring a theory associated with gender feminism, while using abortion an as example.
Women choose abortions for different reasons, for example rape, incest, or just not being ready to take care of a baby. There are two sides to abortion which is pro-life and pro-choice. Pro-life means that people are fully against abortion no matter what are the circumstances, while pro-choice is leaving the decision up to the mother of the baby. The issue of abortion Antipuesto states, “[Is] one of the most ethical dilemmas the society is facing for decades”. Some nurses feel comfortable with giving abortions while others do not due to religion or their personal beliefs.
The term "Sociological Imagination" was introduced by C. Wright Mills in 1959. The definition of Sociological imagination from our textbook is “the ability to understand how your own past relates to that of other people, as well as to history in general and societal structures in particular”. In other words, Sociological Imagination is the ability to recognize that an individual's personal troubles are a product of public issues which aren’t always controlled by the individual. This concept can help to provide a better understanding about the current social problems our nation is facing. Sociological imagination helps an individual understand the society in which they live in by placing an individual away from reality and looking beyond the
As Americans, we view the Constitution as a stepping stone to making the great country we live in today. Yet, we the people of the United States failed to realize another component in order to form a perfect union. Which is to establish and promote equal opportunities for a quality education for all. However, we live in a society where social locators such as class, gender, and race are huge factors in the determination of one’s educational future.
It is not guaranteed that women will have a normal pregnancy later in life after having an illegal abortion. Backstreet abortionists have no formal qualifications and sees this mainly as an opportunity to make money. Illegal abortions can be costly the further you are in your pregnancy. Legal abortions in South Africa is free and is performed in most hospitals and clinics, however it is still responsible for many maternal deaths in South Africa. With the legalisation of abortion, I believe that women use abortion as a form of contraception.