Harper Lee's classic book To Kill a Mockingbird focuses on the concept of coming of age through the lives of its two main characters, Jem and Scout. The 1930s were a time of racial injustice and discrimination in the American South, which is the setting in which the novel is set. The characters are made to confront their own beliefs and ideas as a result of the events that take place in the story, which eventually leads to their personal development. Lee uses symbolism and imagery to convey the themes of losing one's innocence and racial injustice.
The first literary device used by Harper Lee in her writing is symbolism. The mockingbird is a great illustration of the symbolism used by Lee in chapter 17. The mockingbird is a representation of
…show more content…
Racial disparity in Maycomb is shown vividly. People of color are oppressed and discriminated against in Maycomb, from Lee's portrayal of the town throughout the entire book. The novel's representation of the African American community makes clear use of this imagery. African People are depicted as being ostracized and subject to prejudice on the part of the white community. They are portrayed as being helpless, illiterate, and poor. For instance, the white community instinctively concludes that Tom Robinson is guilty because of the color of his skin, despite the lack of proof against him, when he is accused of raping Mayella Ewell. An example of imagery in chapter 17 is the description of the courtroom. The black people are said to be restricted to the balcony, while the white people are said to be seated in the first seats. The racial segregation that prevails in the South at the time is shown by this imagery. "The Negroes sat upstairs. They crowded each other and peered down into the courtroom." (Lee 210). A second use of imagery from this scene comes from this quote, "The jury box was to the left, under the judge's bench... it was a tight squeeze for twelve men." (Lee 206). The cramped and uncomfortable area where the jury sits throughout the trial is described in this quote using imagery. It reveals how anxious and under pressure the jurors are to reach the best verdict. Lee’s use of imagery helps create an
“12 Angry Men,” written by Reginald Rose, is a drama or play about a boy who is put on trial for murdering his father. 12 jurors are put into the jury room to discuss and come up with the boy's verdict, but they can't come up with a unanimous decision. Juror 8 stands alone with his opinion of “not guilty,” but he isn’t the only one who convinces the rest of the jury for “not guilty.” Juror 9 also has an impact on the vote to be unanimous in favor of “not guilty.” Juror 9 played an important role for the verdict to be “not guilty” by trying to prove other points against the boy being “guilty.”
Faced with a question of this magnitude, the jurors fight to bring their opinion to light, while also attempting to keep themselves from attaching to the case and to the boy, citing that there's always something else to do, something else to care about. Through the use of pathos in 12 Angry Men by Reginald Rose, he illustrates the detachment of jurors within a court case is dangerous. Juries, by
When juror number three finally speaks, “not guilty!”(Rose 1957) After realizing his prejudice, all along, it brings attention to the reader, turning their heads, and feeling relief as though the defendant is not guilty. Since juror number ten and juror number three were the most headstrong and argumentative, the moments of their final realization were very important. When the murder weapon is brought into the room, journal number eight contradicts the court's evidence and pulls out a replica of the knife. The evidence is automatically unreasonable.
In Twelve Angry Men the direction of the jury room was pushed by self interest to leave. ‘7th Juror: goddamn waste of time. 10th Juror: yeah, can you imagine, sitting there for three days just for this.’
In the book To Kill A Mockingbird by Harper Lee talks about discrimination based on gender role, age, and skin color. The characters in this book all have different personalities that influences others. Maycomb, Alabama in 1930’s is where everything happened with slavery and struggling with being poor. The characters Scout, Jem, and Dill had a strong bond and had lots of courage. Shows that justice means other things to other people.
Jury duty is often regarded by most of society as a dull and tiresome obligation. Perhaps one would be inclined to change their assessment if jury duty meant you and eleven other men were the only thing standing between a boy and the electric chair. The teleplay Twelve Angry Men, written by Reginald Rose, tells the story of a 1950’s court case wherein a young man, under suspicion of murdering his father, faces the death penalty. The script centers around the twelve men of the jury as they decide whether or not the boy will live or die. As tensions start to run higher, the jurors get into intense arguments, sometimes letting outside biases overtake them.
Courage is not strength or skill, it’s simply standing up for what you believe in and what is right. This is the theme that was enrolled after Jem destroys Mrs.Dubose’s camellias and after she died in chapter 11. This passage also reveals Jem’s coming of age moment. After using conflict, symbolism, and point of view, Harper Lee was able to connect the theme with Jems coming of age moment.
Maturing is something everyone goes through in life whether you go through it early or a little later in life. In the book, To Kill a Mockingbird, Harper Lee shows a lot about maturing. Growing up in a small town in Maycomb, Alabama where life was a lot more different from today, you mature much different and in different ways. Jem is one person who matures through the whole story and makes realizations about people around him, including his dad, Tom Robinson, and Mrs. Dubose. Jem goes into the story thinking his dad is just some old man but as he gets older, he realizes there is more to his dad.
"Don 't judge a book by its cover" is a famous saying that some of us heard it before and some of us experienced it. 12 jurors were experiencing this quote when they gathered to decide whether a young boy is guilty by killing his father or not. Juror 2 stated, "Well, anyway, I think he was guilty" (6). Juror 2 represent most of us, as sometimes we judge from what we hear and not from what we see. The 12 jurors are from various backgrounds and each one has a distinctive personality.
In Harper Lee’s historical fiction novel, To Kill A Mockingbird, two children live in a chaotic world of racial injustice and poverty. In this book, two siblings named Jem and Scout Finch grow and mature in a mysterious area of people battling and supporting racism. Throughout this book, Harper Lee uses symbolism to provide the view of racism. While doing this, she also uses selective choices of diction to shape the story. Harper Lee wrote To Kill A Mockingbird with a purpose, to bring awareness to racial injustice through hidden symbols and diction.
This highlights the importance of being aware of one's biases and striving to be impartial when making decisions, especially in a court of law where the consequences of a wrong verdict can be severe. It's also important to note that the prejudices in the play are not limited to the jurors. The defendant in the play, who is on trial for murder, is a victim of prejudice from the larger society. He is from a different race and background from the jurors, and this difference contributes to their biases and mistrust towards him. The play suggests that these prejudices and biases are so deeply ingrained in society that even a courtroom, where justice is supposed to be served objectively, is not immune from
The script introduces the viewers to the typical behavior and the state of mind of these jurors, who surprisingly turn out to be the last to change their opinions from “guilty” to “not guilty”. Juror#3 the frustrated father whose personal conflicts and experiences influence his view of the accused’s crime is very desperate to make it clear that his mind is already made up before the deliberations even start. Similar
Many of the jurors use logos, logic and reasoning, to lay out the evidence in a rational and concrete manner to convince him. An example is when 4th Juror lays out all of the evidence of the knife to convince 8th Juror with seven, linear, factual points. The reader and audience is meant to connect a sense of ethos, reliability or competence, to 8th Juror, as he is the only one who doesn’t, at first, seem to be clouded by ignorance, racism, disinterest, or any other characteristic that might cloud
The justice system that relies on twelve individuals reaching a life-or-death decision has many complications and dangers. The play Twelve Angry Men, by Reiginald Rose, illustrates the dangers of a justice system that relies on twelve people reaching a life-or-death decision because people are biased, they think of a jury system as an inconvenience, and many people aren’t as intelligent as others. The first reason why Reiginald illustrates dangers is because people can be biased or they can stereotype the defendant. The Jurors in Twelve Angry Men relate to this because a few of them were biased and several of them stereotyped the defendant for being from the slums. The defendant in this play was a 19 year old kid from the slums.