In addition, the opponents of Title IX might also agree that football should be withdrawn from the Title IX’s list as women do not play football. Nevertheless, before making the statements that a sport should be eliminated in the Title IX equation due the lack of one gender’s participation, one should consider other sports where there are only a small number of men compared to the women participants. Particularly in volleyballs and field hockey, they are males and females player. However in this case, men participants are outnumbered by the females athletes (Zimmerman). So, should volleyball and hockey be removed from Title IX privileges too? Those who don 't want football counted in participation opportunities say football should stand on its own because there is no equivalent women …show more content…
Finally, one of the issues with the cases made against Title IX is that these sentiments are one-sided. A hefty portion of the articles that condemn the impact of Title IX on men 's athletic fields originated from the one, particularly male whose life was directly affected by the removal of his desire sports in the list of college sports. This was illustrated by Michael Lancaster in the article of “Title IX Laws and Intercollegiate Athletics.” In this composition, he writes about the elimination of track and field at Nicholls State University that later caused his scholarship to be cut (Lancaster). The issue with this article is that Lancaster himself was one of the athletes who were being victimized in the name of Title IX. So, he might be presenting prejudice information against the Title IX as he was one of those athletes who have been affected by the elimination of a sports team. Not only this one, many other publicized articles who are created to speak evil about the Title IX also written by the coaches and athletes who
Case Name, Citation, Year Cook v. Florida High School Athletic Association (FHSAA), 09-cv-00547 M.D. Fla. (2009) Facts of the Case: On June 16, 2009 parents of female athletes at FHSAA member schools filed suit against the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida alleging that the newPolicy 6 discriminates against female students according to Title IX by reducing school participation in completions by 40 percent at the varsity level and 20 percent at the sub-varsity level. The plaintiffs also stated a complaint that male driven sports where exempt from this action because cheerleading was not recognized as a sport thus breaking the Title IX law. Issues: Why did Policy 6 reduced the number of competitions
In class, we have talked in to very good depth about the Title IX. The investigator found that the school’s efforts in implement Title IX were arranged, slow, and obstruct by a lack of engagement and support by senior leadership. Baylor University complies with Title IX, which doesn’t allow discrimination, sexual violence, or sexual harassment. Art Biles failed to follow this by not doing something about his player raping another female athlete. Briles is trying to find another coaching job at the moment
Although Wells and Marbella suggest that men’s sports are being hurt because of Title IX, Goodale establishes that Title IX is not negatively impacting men’s athletics and is necessary for colleges to follow. Title IX, a 40-year law establishing equal opportunity for women has not negatively impacted men’s sports, as clarified in “40 Years Later, Title IX is Still Fighting Perception it Hurt Men’s Sports” by Gloria Goodale. First and foremost, sports like Football and Basketball take up a majority of a college budget for men’s sports, and when colleges cut minor teams such as baseball or tennis Title IX is unfairly blamed. A large amount of colleges decide to limit men’s athletic to large money-making sports such as football or basketball
In addition to instructing students and publishing academic work, she provides Title IX representation and serves as a Title IX auditor for the Division I State University Athletic Department and various Texas A&M coaches. Mary Margaret Penrose previously served as a professor of law with the University of Oklahoma, where she served as a cooperating attorney with the National Title IX Organization of the Women’s Sports Foundation and provided pro bono legal representation to high school lacrosse team members. She also provided pro bono representation for multiple Title IX cases while an attorney in private practice in Dallas,
In the article titled Face-off on the playing field By, Judith B. Stamper explains girls have their own story of support or discrimination, success also the debate of girls be allowed to compete on boys’ sports team. First, the writer Title IX explains female athletes are been treated second-class for long enough and should pass of inequalities and biases of girls. The writer also clarifies that girls doing sports make them healthier, physically, and emotionally. Other girls that don’t play sports are less likely to use of drugs. In addition, she notes a former Stanford University basketball player Mariah says, strength and independence of things girls learn from sports, the opportunities that are changing women.
First of all, some argues that the tittle IX grants equal sporting opportunities for both male and female students; however, the inequality or unfair treatment for female athletic student still exists. At every high school or college, young female athletics are still facing with the discrimination on the playing field. Women and girls just receive only 42 percent of the opportunities to play sports in high school and college even though female were half of total students.
400 plus men’s sports programs have been eliminated. Low revenue sports, such as wrestling, swimming, and track and field have been affected the most. This trend was not intended upon the passing of Title IX, however, it is a disturbing result regardless. Due to the second component of the 3-prong-test, which states financial aid (scholarships) must be proportional to the participation rates in athletic programs, low revenue men's programs are being cut because all NCAA Division I football programs are required to offer 65 scholarships minimum; football programs take up a good amount of the financial aid allocated to the male athletic programs. Therefore, other, nonrevenue, sports programs are unable to offer their players as much or any financial aid causing their programs to be cut, as many athletes won’t be willing to play unless they are on
The Department of Health, Education, and Welfare issued the initial interpretation of Title IX’s application into intercollegiate athletics. The (HEW), now referred to as Health and Human Services (HHS) faced a decline in 1975 due to institutional compliance issues. These regulations were felt by many universities across the United States and was criticized as “inadequate and vague”. However, Title IX was passed in 1972, the seriousness with certain institutions considered this law while planning their athletic programs has dramatically changed over time with a variety of different court rulings and legislation.
I also do not agree that it would be fair men's sports had to help funds women's sports or vice versa. I think Title IX has good intentions in such the attempt to stop discrimination and sex segregation, but I feel that individuals' whom have power over applications, still have the ability to deny applications and write off a different reason for denial. Overall, Title IX has it's pros and cons. I believe this policy would be great if applied appropriately and if it did not have holes in the system.
Alongside athletics, Pruitt also explains that “female students were often barred from certain male-only courses or fields of study, including everything from wood shop and calculus to criminal justice, law and medicine.” Often, Title IX is only thought of as opening the door for women to participate in athletics; however, it does much more than that. Title IX allows women to participate in typically male-associated classes and activities. This participation allows women to partake in STEM career fields, such as construction and engineering. Not only does Title IX break gender barriers across the job spectrum, but it allows women more college opportunities as well as the ability to pursue higher education.
Title nine requires athletic programs to be equivalent to enrollment. The number of sports programs for each sex should reflect the ratio of students enrolled in the school. With more women attending college the need for more sports programs has grown dramatically. I don’t want to get in a political discussion about schools who have cut men’s programs so I will only speak on schools who have added women’s programs. This opportunity has not only improved
Some aspects of Title IX will tell you which side you will decide on. Even though I think Title IX is fair to men and women some may disagree with me. They might say that since Title IX seems to be paying more attention to girls they tend to cut out equal rights for men such as playing sports.
For, instance, if college athletes were to unionize and get paid, then all collegiate athletes would want the same compensation deal, although their sport doesn’t generate as much revenue as power and performance sports such as football and basketball. The ramifications can be serious if female student athletes mention Title IX, which is a gender equity law that prohibits sex discrimination in any federally funded program or activity. Since some women’s sports generate revenue,
If society stops to understand the struggles these women have been facing for decades will have a clearer picture of what steps to take in order to make a change in the sports industry. Men need to put their masculinity aside and advocate giving women a voice. The purpose of this paper is to explore the issues women in the sport world have faced through history, wage gaps, current issues today, and to discuss findings and recommendations for future research. Title IX is a law that came into effect in 1972, this comprehensive federal law prohibited discrimination on the basis of sex in any federally funded education program or activity.
“Female discrimination in sports is a common occurrence all around the world, women are seen as less than males.” (Ladrea) Equality in sports is unequal. In the 1800 women got very little attention and did not get the opportunity to play in any sport in America and all around the world. Men could go and try out for different sports teams and workout but for women they were only allowed to stay home to cook and clean. There were some events women could participate in but it could not be competitive, it was focused on getting active and staying active.